Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Comments for:

America’s deadly flirtation with antiscience and the medical freedom movement
Peter J. Hotez
Peter J. Hotez
Published February 25, 2021
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(7):e149072. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI149072.
View: Text | PDF
Viewpoint

America’s deadly flirtation with antiscience and the medical freedom movement

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Authors

Peter J. Hotez

×

The Time is Now to Amplify Women and BIPOC Experts to Address Vulnerable Populations with Vaccine Hesitancy

Submitter: Jacelyn Peabody Lever | jpeabody@uab.edu

Authors: Jacelyn Peabody Lever, Michele Bamgartner, Ihuoma Njoku, Ayushi Aggarwal, Monica Verduzco-Guiterrez

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Published May 7, 2021

Dear Editor,

We were very interested in reading Dr. Hotez's viewpoint on America's deadly flirtation with antiscience and the medical freedom movement. His recount of the deep-rooted medical freedom movement within our nation artfully demonstrated how such an obstinate culture of medical mistrust and antiscience persists today. Doubt in the scientific process and deaths from the vaccine-preventable disease are modern travesties resulting from mainstream response to recent medical missteps like the retracted Wakefield paper falsely linking vaccines to autism and built upon a complicated backstory including the heinous "Tuskegee Study of the Untreated Negro Male."

The internet and social media undoubtedly contributed to disseminating misinformation and fueling an anti-vaccination movement. The historical targeting of racial and ethnic groups and the current COVID-19 pandemic is particularly interesting. Anti-vax groups leverage existing mistrust in medicine, especially in Black communities, with false equivalence for vaccination and the unethical experimentation in Tuskegee {Jaiswal 2019 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511}. The last Tuskegee study participant died in 2004, and there are still 11 offspring receiving benefits from the reparation {https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm}. This atrocity remains in recent memory, especially in BIPOC communities.

For example, a federally funded poll by the Alabama Department of Public Health to better understand COVID-19 vaccine reluctance among BIPOC persons showed that speed of development, lack of trust in government research, and general skepticism of vaccines were drivers of vaccine hesitancy {Landers 2021 https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/news/2021/03/26.html}. Additionally, focus groups revealed that African Americans are sensitive to feeling "targeted," Hispanics were disproportionately worried about being deported, and African Americans, Hispanics, and Tribal Nations were all concerned about not being insured and the price of vaccination. Lack of minority representation in vaccine trials is also concerning and fodder for distrust {Flores 2021 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640}. Social determinants of health, including race or ethnicity, can potentiate vaccine reluctance {Kelly 2021 doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06023-9}.

We propose a call to action by the physician-scientist community to expand our local and virtual community engagement to help squelch antiscience narratives and increase the representation of diverse, expert voices. As BIPOC communities have been particularly affected by the rising COVID-19 death toll, they must hear from individuals with a similar background. In conclusion, we should follow Dr. Hotez's example and utilize our platforms to reach people at risk from antiscience disinformation. It is of utmost importance that we amplify women's voices and BIPOC experts to better reach vulnerable populations with vaccine hesitancy.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts