BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence, in transgenic mice and in vitro, that inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (iKIRs) can modulate T cell responses. Furthermore, we have previously shown that iKIRs are an important determinant of T cell–mediated control of chronic viral infection and that these results are consistent with an increase in the CD8+ T cell lifespan due to iKIR-ligand interactions. Here, we tested this prediction and investigated whether iKIRs affect T cell lifespan in humans in vivo.METHODS We used stable isotope labeling with deuterated water to quantify memory CD8+ T cell survival in healthy individuals and patients with chronic viral infections.RESULTS We showed that an individual’s iKIR-ligand genotype was a significant determinant of CD8+ T cell lifespan: in individuals with 2 iKIR-ligand gene pairs, memory CD8+ T cells survived, on average, for 125 days; in individuals with 4 iKIR-ligand gene pairs, the memory CD8+ T cell lifespan doubled to 250 days. Additionally, we showed that this survival advantage was independent of iKIR expression by the T cell of interest and, further, that the iKIR-ligand genotype altered the CD8+ and CD4+ T cell immune aging phenotype.CONCLUSIONS Together, these data reveal an unexpectedly large effect of iKIR genotype on T cell survival.FUNDING Wellcome Trust; Medical Research Council; EU Horizon 2020; EU FP7; Leukemia and Lymphoma Research; National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; Imperial College Research Fellowship; National Institutes of Health; Jefferiss Trust.
Yan Zhang, Ada W.C. Yan, Lies Boelen, Linda Hadcocks, Arafa Salam, Daniel Padrosa Gispert, Loiza Spanos, Laura Mora Bitria, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, James A. Traherne, Chrissy Roberts, Danai Koftori, Graham P. Taylor, Daniel Forton, Paul J. Norman, Steven G.E. Marsh, Robert Busch, Derek C. Macallan, Becca Asquith
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.