Submit a comment

Immune complex processing in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. In vivo imaging and clearance studies.
K A Davies, … , H L Beynon, M J Walport
K A Davies, … , H L Beynon, M J Walport
Published November 1, 1992
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1992;90(5):2075-2083. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116090.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Immune complex processing in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. In vivo imaging and clearance studies.

Abstract

Abnormal processing of immune complexes (IC) may be important in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The clearance of large soluble IC (comprising hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)/anti-HBsAg) radiolabeled with 123I was examined in 12 normal subjects and 10 patients with SLE. IC localization was analyzed by static and dynamic gamma-scintigraphy. Initial IC clearance from blood was more rapid in patients (median t1/2 = 2.15 min) than normals (median t1/2 = 5.15 min) due to more rapid uptake in the liver. However, in the SLE group, up to 12% of complexes were released from the liver after 30-50 min. Splenic uptake of immune complexes was reduced in the patients and there was reduced ability to retain IC in this organ. Plasma complement levels and erythrocyte complement receptor type 1 numbers were reduced in the patients, resulting in defective opsonization of IC and reduced red cell binding in vivo. These observations support the hypothesis that IC handling is abnormal in SLE.

Authors

K A Davies, A M Peters, H L Beynon, M J Walport

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required