Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Destabilizing NEK2 overcomes resistance to proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma
Reinaldo Franqui-Machin, … , Guido Tricot, Fenghuang Zhan
Reinaldo Franqui-Machin, … , Guido Tricot, Fenghuang Zhan
Published June 4, 2018
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):2877-2893. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI98765.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Destabilizing NEK2 overcomes resistance to proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Drug resistance remains the key problem in cancer treatment. It is now accepted that each myeloma patient harbors multiple subclones and subclone dominance may change over time. The coexistence of multiple subclones with high or low chromosomal instability (CIN) signature causes heterogeneity and drug resistance with consequent disease relapse. In this study, using a tandem affinity purification–mass spectrometry (TAP-MS) technique, we found that NEK2, a CIN gene, was bound to the deubiquitinase USP7. Binding to USP7 prevented NEK2 ubiquitination resulting in NEK2 stabilization. Increased NEK2 kinase levels activated the canonical NF-κB signaling pathway through the PP1α/AKT axis. Newly diagnosed myeloma patients with activated NF-κB signaling through increased NEK2 activity had poorer event-free and overall survivals based on multiple independent clinical cohorts. We also found that NEK2 activated heparanase, a secreted enzyme, responsible for bone destruction in an NF-κB–dependent manner. Intriguingly, both NEK2 and USP7 inhibitors showed great efficacy in inhibiting myeloma cell growth and overcoming NEK2-induced and -acquired drug resistance in xenograft myeloma mouse models.

Authors

Reinaldo Franqui-Machin, Mu Hao, Hua Bai, Zhimin Gu, Xin Zhan, Hasem Habelhah, Yogesh Jethava, Lugui Qiu, Ivana Frech, Guido Tricot, Fenghuang Zhan

×

Figure 9

INH1 and P5091 overcomes NEK2-induced bortezomib resistance.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
INH1 and P5091 overcomes NEK2-induced bortezomib resistance.
(A) Approxi...
(A) Approximately 0.5 × 106 NEK2-OE ARP1 cells expressing luciferase were injected subcutaneously in both left and right flanks of NOD-Rag1null mice. One week after injection of NEK2-OE cells, mice were treated with (i) vehicle, (ii) bortezomib (BTZ; 3 mg/kg, i.p., 2 times/week), (iii) INH1 (100 mg/kg, i.p., 3 times/week), (iv) P5091 (10 mg/kg, i.v., 2 times/week), (v) INH1 + BTZ, or (vii) P5091 + BTZ for 28 days. In vivo imaging showing the tumor growth in the different groups of mice before and after treatments at different time points. (B) Tumors from A were harvested and photographed. (C) Quantification of tumor volume from dissected tumors in B and Dunnett’s method was used to calculate the multiplicity-adjusted P values for each treatment and control group pair. ***P = 0.005; ****P = 0.0001. NS, no significance. (D) Quantification of tumor weight from dissected tumors in B and Dunnett’s method was used to calculate the multiplicity-adjusted P values for each treatment and control group pair. **P = 0.0032; ††P = 0.0052; ****P = 0.0001. NS, no significance. (E) Tumors from B were lysed and analyzed by Western blot using NEK2, p-p65-S536, and GAPDH antibodies.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts