Go to JCI Insight
Jci spelled out white on transparent.20160208
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews...
    • Biology of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (Feb 2019)
    • Mitochondrial dysfunction in disease (Aug 2018)
    • Lipid mediators of disease (Jul 2018)
    • Cellular senescence in human disease (Apr 2018)
    • Fibrosis (Jan 2018)
    • Glia and Neurodegeneration (Sep 2017)
    • Transplantation (Jun 2017)
    • View all review series...
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Scientific Show Stoppers
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

Jci only white

  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • Brief Reports
  • Technical Advances
  • Commentaries
  • Editorials
  • Hindsight
  • Review series
  • Reviews
  • The Attending Physician
  • First Author Perspectives
  • Scientific Show Stoppers
  • Top read articles
  • Concise Communication
Top
  • View PDF Adobe pdf file icon
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • License information
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI
  • Top
  • Footnotes
  • Version history
Advertisement

Perspective Free access | 10.1172/JCI97405

Starting out as a physician-scientist: the crucial first step on the ladder to success

Joseph L. Goldstein

Regental Professor and Chair, Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Address correspondence to: Joseph L. Goldstein, Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Room L5-238, Dallas, Texas 75390-9046, USA. Phone: 214.648.2141; Email: joe.goldstein@utsouthwestern.edu.

Find articles by Goldstein, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

First published October 2, 2017 - More info

Published in Volume 127, Issue 10 on October 2, 2017
J Clin Invest. 2017;127(10):3576–3576. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97405.
Copyright © 2017, American Society for Clinical Investigation

First published October 2, 2017 - Version history

Many of you in the audience are just beginning your careers as physician-scientists. And most of you, I suspect, are struggling with the question of how can I do something worthwhile in biomedical research. The answer to your struggles may be found in a provocative sculpture created by the contemporary African American artist Martin Puryear (Figure 1).

Ladder for Booker T. Washington.Figure 1

Ladder for Booker T. Washington. Martin Puryear. 1966. Wood (ash and maple). 36 × 1.9 feet (narrowing at top to 3 inches). Collection of the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth. Gift of Ruth Carter Stevenson, by Exchange.

Puryear’s sculpture is a tall wooden ladder (36 feet high) suspended by invisible wires, enabling it to float from the ceiling of the atrium of the Museum of Modern Art in Fort Worth. Puryear constructed the ladder from a single oak tree. The bottom rung is 2 feet wide, and the top rung is 1 inch wide. There are 100 rungs, most of which are at the top and not visible in the photograph. The narrowing of the ladder towards the top creates a distorted visual perspective that evokes an illusionary goal that is unattainable. It is easy to get both feet on the first rung of the ladder, but it is an almost impossible struggle to reach the top. Opportunity narrows at the very highest reaches.

Puryear created this work to symbolize the struggles of Booker T. Washington, who was the dominant African American figure in the U.S. in the early 1900s. Booker T. Washington was born into slavery in 1856, was freed at age 9, and by age 25 had established the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama as a trade school for African Americans. His autobiography, Up from Slavery, is still read today, more than 100 years after it was written. Harvard University conferred an honorary degree on Washington in 1896 when he was only 40 years of age.

Puryear’s ladder can be thought of as a universal metaphor for everyone who struggles to do something worthwhile. But there’s another way to think about the ladder that may be more relevant to beginning physician-scientists (Figure 2). If we turn the Booker T. Washington ladder upside down, the difficult challenge is not at the top, but at the bottom — getting your little toe on the first rung. Here the ladder symbolizes the struggles of physician-scientists like Barry J. Marshall, who made the totally unexpected discovery that peptic ulcers are caused not by stress, but by a bacterial Helicobacter infection that can be cured with antibiotics. Marshall got his first toe on the ladder by doing a bold experiment in 1985 that opened a new field, but virtually no one recognized the significance of his work when it was first published in the Medical Journal of Australia — not one of your high-profile journals!

Ladder for physician-scientists.Figure 2

Ladder for physician-scientists. Puryear’s Ladder has been turned upside down. Illustration by Nancy Heard; reproduced with permission of the artist.

The Barry J. Marshalls of the world who do truly original research have the first 94 rungs of the upside-down ladder all to themselves for many years until reaching the 95th rung — the 5th rung from the top — where there’s now room for other scientists to jump on the bandwagon and join in on the fun and excitement of a new venture. This is the tipping point when a new field of science or medicine explodes with widening opportunities and becomes widely recognized as important.

So what is the best way for a young physician-scientist to get his or her little toe on the first rung of the upside-down ladder? The key is to choose the right mentor. You don’t want a mentor who counts papers, who is focused on impact, or who seeks press conferences. What you want is a mentor who can teach you how to ask the right question. Asking and framing the right question — one that is original, interesting, and experimentally tractable — is the hardest thing to do in science. In my view, the biggest mistake that beginning scientists make is to follow the crowd, which means you will be asking the next incremental question — not a bold one.

To the beginning physician-scientists in the audience, I wish you all good luck and success in selecting a mentor who can teach you how to ask the right question. Remember, you can’t choose your parents, but you can choose your mentors.

Footnotes

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(10):3576. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97405.

Remarks at the Presentation of the 2017 Donald Seldin~Holly Smith Award for Pioneering Research during the annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation and Association of American Physicians, Chicago, IL, April 22, 2017.

Version history
  • Version 1 (October 2, 2017): Print issue publication

Article tools

  • View PDF Adobe pdf file icon
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • License information
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI

Go to:

  • Top
  • Footnotes
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow JCI: Facebook logo white Twitter logo v2 Rss icon
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts