Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD122 signaling in CD8+ memory T cells drives costimulation-independent rejection
David V. Mathews, Ying Dong, Laura B. Higginbotham, Steven C. Kim, Cynthia P. Breeden, Elizabeth A. Stobert, Joseph Jenkins, J. Yun Tso, Christian P. Larsen, Andrew B. Adams
David V. Mathews, Ying Dong, Laura B. Higginbotham, Steven C. Kim, Cynthia P. Breeden, Elizabeth A. Stobert, Joseph Jenkins, J. Yun Tso, Christian P. Larsen, Andrew B. Adams
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

CD122 signaling in CD8+ memory T cells drives costimulation-independent rejection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Interrupting T cell costimulatory signals as a strategy to control undesired immune responses, such as occur in autoimmunity or transplantation, has the potential to alleviate many of the unwanted side effects associated with current immunosuppressive therapies. Belatacept, a high-affinity version of CTLA4-Ig that blocks ligand ligation to CD28, has been approved for use in kidney transplant recipients. Despite the long-term benefits associated with its use, such as improved renal function and lower cardiovascular risk, a subset of patients treated with belatacept experience elevated rates of acute T cell–mediated rejection, tempering enthusiasm for its use. Here we demonstrate that costimulation-independent T cell alloreactivity relies on signaling through CD122, the shared IL-2 and IL-15 receptor β-chain. Combined costimulatory and CD122 blockade improved survival of transplanted tissue in mice and nonhuman primates by controlling proliferation and effector function of CD8+ T cells. The high-affinity IL-2 receptor was dispensable for memory CD8+ T cell responses, whereas signaling through CD122 as a component of the high-affinity IL-15 receptor was critical for costimulation-independent memory CD8+ T cell recall, distinguishing specific roles for IL-2 and IL-15 in T cell activation. These studies outline a novel approach for clinical optimization of costimulatory blockade strategies in transplantation by targeting CD122.

Authors

David V. Mathews, Ying Dong, Laura B. Higginbotham, Steven C. Kim, Cynthia P. Breeden, Elizabeth A. Stobert, Joseph Jenkins, J. Yun Tso, Christian P. Larsen, Andrew B. Adams

×

Figure 7

Immunologic impact of combined belatacept+αCD122 therapy in NHP kidney transplant recipients.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Immunologic impact of combined belatacept+αCD122 therapy in NHP kidney t...
(A) Longitudinal analysis of CD3+ T cell frequencies did not reveal significant differences in CD4+ or CD8+ subsets, nor were there significant changes in memory subsets between belatacept (black squares) and belatacept+αCD122 (gray circles) treated animals. (B) Comparison of pretransplant CD8+ memory subsets did not discriminate between animals which rejected on combination therapy (C1 and C2) versus those which rejected after withdrawal of anti-CD122 (C3) versus animals with prolonged survival (C4 and C5). However, graft infiltrating CD8+ T cells in animals which experienced prolonged survival demonstrated a marked increase in CD28+CD45RA– T cells. Data represented by FACS plots and corresponding graphs depicting memory subset frequencies. (C) Characterization of graft infiltrate from 3 animals treated with belatacept alone demonstrating similar graft infiltrate phenotype to C1 and C2, combination therapy–resistant animals. Sample FACS plot of one belatacept alone animal demonstrating no increased expression of CD25 in graft infiltrating CD8+ T cells (solid black histogram) compared with peripheral blood (gray histogram, no fill) at the time of rejection. In contrast graft infiltrating CD8+ T cells (solid black histogram) had increased expression of CD122. (D) Combination belatacept+αCD122 (black diamonds) and belatacept monotherapy (black squares) treated animals did not develop donor-specific antibody during treatment. Animals receiving αCD122 monotherapy (black circles) demonstrated a positive DSA at the time of sacrifice. DSA greater than 500 MFI was positive.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts