Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
A revised view of cardiac sodium channel “blockade” in the long-QT syndrome
Nicholas G. Kambouris, H. Bradley Nuss, David C. Johns, Eduardo Marbán, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Jeffrey R. Balser
Nicholas G. Kambouris, H. Bradley Nuss, David C. Johns, Eduardo Marbán, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Jeffrey R. Balser
View: Text | PDF
Article

A revised view of cardiac sodium channel “blockade” in the long-QT syndrome

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mutations in SCN5A, encoding the cardiac sodium (Na) channel, are linked to a form of the congenital long-QT syndrome (LQT3) that provokes lethal ventricular arrhythmias. These autosomal dominant mutations disrupt Na channel function, inhibiting channel inactivation, thereby causing a sustained ionic current that delays cardiac repolarization. Sodium channel–blocking antiarrhythmics, such as lidocaine, potently inhibit this pathologic Na current (INa) and are being evaluated in patients with LQT3. The mechanism underlying this effect is unknown, although high-affinity “block” of the open Na channel pore has been proposed. Here we report that a recently identified LQT3 mutation (R1623Q) imparts unusual lidocaine sensitivity to the Na channel that is attributable to its altered functional behavior. Studies of lidocaine on individual R1623Q single-channel openings indicate that the open-time distribution is not changed, indicating the drug does not block the open pore as proposed previously. Rather, the mutant channels have a propensity to inactivate without ever opening (“closed-state inactivation”), and lidocaine augments this gating behavior. An allosteric gating model incorporating closed-state inactivation recapitulates the effects of lidocaine on pathologic INa. These findings explain the unusual drug sensitivity of R1623Q and provide a general and unanticipated mechanism for understanding how Na channel–blocking agents may suppress the pathologic, sustained Na current induced by LQT3 mutations.

Authors

Nicholas G. Kambouris, H. Bradley Nuss, David C. Johns, Eduardo Marbán, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Jeffrey R. Balser

×

Figure 1

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
R1623Q channels exhibit enhanced sensitivity to lidocaine. (a) Whole-cel...
R1623Q channels exhibit enhanced sensitivity to lidocaine. (a) Whole-cell Na currents in Xenopus oocytes depolarized from –100 to –20 mV in the presence (dotted line) and absence (solid line) of 200 μM lidocaine. For both wild-type (right panel) and R1623Q (left panel), paired observations from a single oocyte are shown. (b) Summarized τ50 data before (open bars) and after (solid bars) exposure to 200 μM lidocaine. τ50 represents the time (ms) from peak INa to 50% decay (R1623Q control, n = 17; R1623Q 200 μM lidocaine, n = 14; wild-type control, n = 9; wild-type 200 μM lidocaine, n = 9). For R1623Q, τ50 was significantly reduced by lidocaine (AP < 0.01). (c) Summary of paired data comparing the fractional reduction of peak INa in the presence versus the absence of 200 μM lidocaine for oocytes expressing either R1623Q (left bar, n = 14) or wild-type (right bar, n = 9). Lidocaine suppression of peak INa was greater for R1623Q (AP < 0.05).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts