To determine whether an additional loss of the coagulation factor VII (FVII) gene influenced the coagulopathy observed in protein C gene–deficient (PC–/–) embryos and neonates, we crossed mice doubly heterozygous for the factor VII (FVII+/–) and protein C (PC+/–) genes to produce offspring possessing the 9 predicted genotypic combinations. FVII–/–/PC–/– embryos, although present at their expected Mendelian frequency, displayed a phenotype that had not been observed in either the FVII or PC singly deficient embryos. At E12.5 days postcoitum (dpc), FVII–/–/PC–/– embryos demonstrated an intra- and extravascular coagulopathy that progressed with substantial concomitant hemorrhage and peripheral edema by E17.5dpc, resulting in mortality immediately after birth. FVII+/–/PC–/– embryos showed a less severe phenotype, suggesting a gene dosage effect. The lack of rescue of PC–/– embryos and neonates and augmented coagulopathy resulting from an additional heterozygous or homozygous FVII deficiency are probably due to increased factor Xa and thrombin generation, resulting from loss of FVIIa-dependent tissue factor pathway inhibitor function and the absence of control at the levels of factors Va and VIIIa. The presence of fibrin in embryos in the absence of fetal FVII suggests that significant clot-generating potential exists outside of the embryonic factor VII–dependent pathway.
Joyce C.Y. Chan, Ivo Cornelissen, Desire Collen, Victoria A. Ploplis, Francis J. Castellino
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 136 | 34 |
112 | 19 | |
Figure | 115 | 8 |
Table | 34 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 29 | 0 |
Totals | 426 | 61 |
Total Views | 487 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.