Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Targeting the adenosine 2A receptor enhances chimeric antigen receptor T cell efficacy
Paul A. Beavis, … , Michael H. Kershaw, Phillip K. Darcy
Paul A. Beavis, … , Michael H. Kershaw, Phillip K. Darcy
Published February 6, 2017
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(3):929-941. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI89455.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Targeting the adenosine 2A receptor enhances chimeric antigen receptor T cell efficacy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been highly successful in treating hematological malignancies, including acute and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia. However, treatment of solid tumors using CAR T cells has been largely unsuccessful to date, partly because of tumor-induced immunosuppressive mechanisms, including adenosine production. Previous studies have shown that adenosine generated by tumor cells potently inhibits endogenous antitumor T cell responses through activation of adenosine 2A receptors (A2ARs). Herein, we have observed that CAR activation resulted in increased A2AR expression and suppression of both murine and human CAR T cells. This was reversible using either A2AR antagonists or genetic targeting of A2AR using shRNA. In 2 syngeneic HER2+ self-antigen tumor models, we found that either genetic or pharmacological targeting of the A2AR profoundly increased CAR T cell efficacy, particularly when combined with PD-1 blockade. Mechanistically, this was associated with increased cytokine production of CD8+ CAR T cells and increased activation of both CD8+ and CD4+ CAR T cells. Given the known clinical relevance of the CD73/adenosine pathway in several solid tumor types, and the initiation of phase I trials for A2AR antagonists in oncology, this approach has high translational potential to enhance CAR T cell efficacy in several cancer types.

Authors

Paul A. Beavis, Melissa A. Henderson, Lauren Giuffrida, Jane K. Mills, Kevin Sek, Ryan S. Cross, Alexander J. Davenport, Liza B. John, Sherly Mardiana, Clare Y. Slaney, Ricky W. Johnstone, Joseph A. Trapani, John Stagg, Sherene Loi, Lev Kats, David Gyorki, Michael H. Kershaw, Phillip K. Darcy

×

Figure 5

Combined A2AR and PD-1 blockade enhances the antitumor efficacy of anti-HER2 CAR T cells by increasing CD8+ IFN-γ production.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Combined A2AR and PD-1 blockade enhances the antitumor efficacy of anti-...
C57BL/6-HER2 mice were injected with E0771-HER2 tumor cells and treated with WT (B and C) or Ly5.1+ (A and D) CAR T cells, anti–PD-1 or 2A3, and SCH58261 or vehicle control per Figures 2 and 3. (B and C) Where indicated, mice were also treated with anti–IFN-γ (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, 4, and 8 after T cell transfer. (C) Mean tumor size at day 14 is shown for each group. (B and C) Data are shown as the mean ± SEM for 5 mice per group from a representative experiment of n = 2. (A and D) Day 9 after T cell transfer, TILs were analyzed by FACS. (A) Proportion of CD3+CD8+ cells that were IFN-γ+. (D) Proportion of CD3+CD8+ or CD3+CD4+ cells expressing Ki-67. (A and D) Data are shown as the mean ± SEM for at least 3 mice from a representative experiment of n = 3. “LXSN T cells” refers to T cells transduced with the empty retroviral vector (LXSN) control. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA (A, C, and D) or 2-way ANOVA (B).

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts