Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tissue-specific exosome biomarkers for noninvasively monitoring immunologic rejection of transplanted tissue
Prashanth Vallabhajosyula, … , Michael R. Rickels, Ali Naji
Prashanth Vallabhajosyula, … , Michael R. Rickels, Ali Naji
Published March 20, 2017
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(4):1375-1391. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI87993.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Tissue-specific exosome biomarkers for noninvasively monitoring immunologic rejection of transplanted tissue

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In transplantation, there is a critical need for noninvasive biomarker platforms for monitoring immunologic rejection. We hypothesized that transplanted tissues release donor-specific exosomes into recipient circulation and that the quantitation and profiling of donor intra-exosomal cargoes may constitute a biomarker platform for monitoring rejection. Here, we have tested this hypothesis in a human-into-mouse xenogeneic islet transplant model and validated the concept in clinical settings of islet and renal transplantation. In the xenogeneic model, we quantified islet transplant exosomes in recipient blood over long-term follow-up using anti-HLA antibody, which was detectable only in xenoislet recipients of human islets. Transplant islet exosomes were purified using anti-HLA antibody–conjugated beads, and their cargoes contained the islet endocrine hormone markers insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin. Rejection led to a marked decrease in transplant islet exosome signal along with distinct changes in exosomal microRNA and proteomic profiles prior to appearance of hyperglycemia. In the clinical settings of islet and renal transplantation, donor exosomes with respective tissue specificity for islet β cells and renal epithelial cells were reliably characterized in recipient plasma over follow-up periods of up to 5 years. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the biomarker potential of transplant exosome characterization for providing a noninvasive window into the conditional state of transplant tissue.

Authors

Prashanth Vallabhajosyula, Laxminarayana Korutla, Andreas Habertheuer, Ming Yu, Susan Rostami, Chao-Xing Yuan, Sanjana Reddy, Chengyang Liu, Varun Korutla, Brigitte Koeberlein, Jennifer Trofe-Clark, Michael R. Rickels, Ali Naji

×

Figure 1

Transplanted human islets release donor-specific exosomes into recipient circulation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Transplanted human islets release donor-specific exosomes into recipient...
(A) Xenoislet transplantation model. Athymic mice were rendered diabetic and transplanted with human islets (2,000 islet equivalents) under the kidney capsule. Normoglycemia was monitored and recipients (n = 25) were sacrificed at various time points (days 14–150) for plasma exosome analysis. (B and C) Recipient plasma total exosome pool was analyzed on NanoSight nanoparticle detector on light scatter and fluorescence modes for donor islet–specific MHC signal using anti–HLA-A (n = 25) (B) and anti–HLA-C (n = 10) (C) quantum dot. All xenoislet samples (n = 25) showed donor HLA exosome signal compared with naive mouse (n = 25) and IgG isotype controls (P= 1.6 × 10–14). Representative samples from xenoislet post-transplant days 14 and 96 are shown. (D) Western blot analysis of total plasma exosomes showed HLA-A signal in xenoislet sample, but not naive mouse sample (1 of 4 shown). Positive controls included exosomes from human islet culture supernatant and human plasma. (E) NanoSight analysis of recipient plasma exosomes from day 14 after islet graftectomy for anti–HLA-A quantum dot was negative for TISEs (P = 1.4 × 10–6). Representative image from 1 of 6 animals is shown. (F) Total plasma exosome numbers were quantified on the NanoSight and expressed as number of nanoparticles per milliliter per microgram of exosome protein. Scatter plot with mean ± SD for N-xeno and R-xeno is shown (P = 0.46, n = 15 in each study arm). (G) NanoSight analysis for HLA-A–positive exosomes showed signal reduction in all R-xeno samples compared with N-xeno animals receiving placebo (PBS) infusion. Representative results from 2 N-xeno (N-xeno 1 and 2) and 5 R-xeno (R-xeno 1–5) animals and IgG isotype control from N-xeno 1 are shown. (H) HLA exosome signal was significantly decreased in all the R-xeno animals compared with N-xeno (P = 4 × 10–15). Scatter plot with mean ± SD is shown.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts