Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Dynamin impacts homology-directed repair and breast cancer response to chemotherapy
Sophia B. Chernikova, Rochelle B. Nguyen, Jessica T. Truong, Stephano S. Mello, Jason H. Stafford, Michael P. Hay, Andrew Olson, David E. Solow-Cordero, Douglas J. Wood, Solomon Henry, Rie von Eyben, Lei Deng, Melanie Hayden Gephart, Asaithamby Aroumougame, Claudia Wiese, John C. Game, Balázs Győrffy, J. Martin Brown
Sophia B. Chernikova, Rochelle B. Nguyen, Jessica T. Truong, Stephano S. Mello, Jason H. Stafford, Michael P. Hay, Andrew Olson, David E. Solow-Cordero, Douglas J. Wood, Solomon Henry, Rie von Eyben, Lei Deng, Melanie Hayden Gephart, Asaithamby Aroumougame, Claudia Wiese, John C. Game, Balázs Győrffy, J. Martin Brown
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Dynamin impacts homology-directed repair and breast cancer response to chemotherapy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

After the initial responsiveness of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) to chemotherapy, they often recur as chemotherapy-resistant tumors, and this has been associated with upregulated homology-directed repair (HDR). Thus, inhibitors of HDR could be a useful adjunct to chemotherapy treatment of these cancers. We performed a high-throughput chemical screen for inhibitors of HDR from which we obtained a number of hits that disrupted microtubule dynamics. We postulated that high levels of the target molecules of our screen in tumors would correlate with poor chemotherapy response. We found that inhibition or knockdown of dynamin 2 (DNM2), known for its role in endocytic cell trafficking and microtubule dynamics, impaired HDR and improved response to chemotherapy of cells and of tumors in mice. In a retrospective analysis, levels of DNM2 at the time of treatment strongly predicted chemotherapy outcome for estrogen receptor–negative and especially for TNBC patients. We propose that DNM2-associated DNA repair enzyme trafficking is important for HDR efficiency and is a powerful predictor of sensitivity to breast cancer chemotherapy and an important target for therapy.

Authors

Sophia B. Chernikova, Rochelle B. Nguyen, Jessica T. Truong, Stephano S. Mello, Jason H. Stafford, Michael P. Hay, Andrew Olson, David E. Solow-Cordero, Douglas J. Wood, Solomon Henry, Rie von Eyben, Lei Deng, Melanie Hayden Gephart, Asaithamby Aroumougame, Claudia Wiese, John C. Game, Balázs Győrffy, J. Martin Brown

×

Figure 4

Response to DNA damage changes tubulin dynamics and involves DNM 2.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Response to DNA damage changes tubulin dynamics and involves DNM 2.
(A a...
(A and B) Super-resolution microscopy analysis reveals a discrete punctate pattern of Rad51 in cytoplasm and nucleus. Human MDA-MB-231-BR3 (A) and CHO AA8 (B) cells fixed at 2 hours after 3 Gy show Rad51 foci in the nucleus. Note the much smaller Rad51 dots in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Scale bars: 3 μm. B, right: Higher-magnification image taken from the same cell as in the left panel; scale bar: 1 μm. Estimation of Rad51 dot size: light gray spheres drawn around Rad51 dots have an average diameter of 280 ± 50 nm. (C) Super-resolution microscopy images of MDA-MB-231-BR3 cells show that Rad51 associates with microtubules in unperturbed cells. Scale bar: 3 μm. (D) 3D super-resolution analysis: images of the same Rad51 vesicles (white numbers) viewed from different angles. Numbers correspond to the same objects. Scale bars: 1 μm. (E) Lysine 40 (K40) α-tubulin acetylation is increased after DNA damage in human B lymphoma cell line PW. Left: Representative images. Scale bars: 20 μm. CMBL, chlorambucil. Right: Quantification of the fluorescence intensity per cell. (F) K40 α-tubulin acetylation increases after DNA damage. FACS of CHO AA8 cells fixed 2 and 4 hours after treatment with x-rays. (G) FACS analysis of K40 α-tubulin acetylation in CHO AA8 cells shows that G2/M-phase cells compared with G1 have the highest increase in tubulin acetylation after radiation. Left: Representative dot plots. Right: Quantification. Shown are means ± SDs from n = 3 experiments. (H) FACS analysis of CHO AA8 cells irradiated with 3 Gy in the absence and presence of the dynamin 2 (DNM2) inhibitor dynasore. (E and G) Significance analysis: ANOVA. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts