Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
mTOR has distinct functions in generating versus sustaining humoral immunity
Derek D. Jones, … , Brendan M. Weiss, David Allman
Derek D. Jones, … , Brendan M. Weiss, David Allman
Published October 17, 2016
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2016;126(11):4250-4261. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI86504.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

mTOR has distinct functions in generating versus sustaining humoral immunity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Little is known about the role of mTOR signaling in plasma cell differentiation and function. Furthermore, for reasons not understood, mTOR inhibition reverses antibody-associated disease in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Here, we have demonstrated that induced B lineage–specific deletion of the gene encoding RAPTOR, an essential signaling adaptor for rapamycin-sensitive mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), abrogated the generation of antibody-secreting plasma cells in mice. Acute treatment with rapamycin recapitulated the effects of RAPTOR deficiency, and both strategies led to the ablation of newly formed plasma cells in the spleen and bone marrow while also obliterating preexisting germinal centers. Surprisingly, although perturbing mTOR activity caused a profound decline in serum antibodies that were specific for exogenous antigen or DNA, frequencies of long-lived bone marrow plasma cells were unaffected. Instead, mTORC1 inhibition led to decreased expression of immunoglobulin-binding protein (BiP) and other factors needed for robust protein synthesis. Consequently, blockade of antibody synthesis was rapidly reversed after termination of rapamycin treatment. We conclude that mTOR signaling plays critical but diverse roles in early and late phases of antibody responses and plasma cell differentiation.

Authors

Derek D. Jones, Brian T. Gaudette, Joel R. Wilmore, Irene Chernova, Alexandra Bortnick, Brendan M. Weiss, David Allman

×

Figure 7

mTOR inhibition constrains antibody secretion in a reversible manner.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
mTOR inhibition constrains antibody secretion in a reversible manner.
B6...
B6.BLIMP1+/GFP mice were treated with rapamycin 7 times over 16 days, whereupon B220− BM plasma cells were sorted and applied to ELISPOT plates. (A) Mean spot sizes and (B) spot intensities were calculated as described in Methods. Dots represent values for individual mice, and horizontal lines indicate means. *P < 0.05 as determined by Student’s t test. (C) Representative images of ELISPOT wells comparing spots from control and rapamycin-treated mice. (A–C) Representative of 2 independent experiments using 5 B6.BLIMP1+/GFP mice per group. (D) B6.BLIMP1+/GFP mice were treated with rapamycin 7 times over 17 days, and serum IgM and IgG were quantified by ELISA. (E) Ten thousand sorted B220− BM plasma cells from mice treated as in D were cultured in complete medium. After 24 hours, secreted Ig was quantified for control and rapamycin-treated cells, relative to a standard curve. *P < 0.01 as determined by Student’s t test comparing control (n = 3) and rapamycin-treated (n = 4) samples. (F) Control and rapamycin-treated mice (treated as in D) were stained for intracellular kappa light chain (IgKappa) by flow cytometry. Shown are representative histograms for control (n = 3) and treated (n = 4) mice. (D–F) Representative of 2 independent experiments. (G) C56BL/6 mice were immunized with NP-CγG, and the serum anti-NP IgG1 response was monitored over time. During the indicated time period (gray region), one cohort of mice was treated twice weekly with rapamycin. *P < 0.01 as determined by Student’s t test comparing control (n = 5) and rapamycin-treated (n = 5) samples. (H) NZB/W mice were monitored over time for serum anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies. One cohort of mice was treated twice weekly with rapamycin beginning at 30 weeks of age and ending at 34 weeks (gray region). *P < 0.01 as determined by Student’s t test comparing control (n = 10) and rapamycin-treated (n = 10) samples.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts