Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Upcoming)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Additive loss-of-function proteasome subunit mutations in CANDLE/PRAAS patients promote type I IFN production
Anja Brehm, … , Ivona Aksentijevich, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky
Anja Brehm, … , Ivona Aksentijevich, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky
Published October 20, 2015
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(11):4196-4211. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI81260.
View: Text | PDF | Erratum
Research Article Immunology

Additive loss-of-function proteasome subunit mutations in CANDLE/PRAAS patients promote type I IFN production

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Autosomal recessive mutations in proteasome subunit β 8 (PSMB8), which encodes the inducible proteasome subunit β5i, cause the immune-dysregulatory disease chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE), which is classified as a proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndrome (PRAAS). Here, we identified 8 mutations in 4 proteasome genes, PSMA3 (encodes α7), PSMB4 (encodes β7), PSMB9 (encodes β1i), and proteasome maturation protein (POMP), that have not been previously associated with disease and 1 mutation in PSMB8 that has not been previously reported. One patient was compound heterozygous for PSMB4 mutations, 6 patients from 4 families were heterozygous for a missense mutation in 1 inducible proteasome subunit and a mutation in a constitutive proteasome subunit, and 1 patient was heterozygous for a POMP mutation, thus establishing a digenic and autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of PRAAS. Function evaluation revealed that these mutations variably affect transcription, protein expression, protein folding, proteasome assembly, and, ultimately, proteasome activity. Moreover, defects in proteasome formation and function were recapitulated by siRNA-mediated knockdown of the respective subunits in primary fibroblasts from healthy individuals. Patient-isolated hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells exhibited a strong IFN gene-expression signature, irrespective of genotype. Additionally, chemical proteasome inhibition or progressive depletion of proteasome subunit gene transcription with siRNA induced transcription of type I IFN genes in healthy control cells. Our results provide further insight into CANDLE genetics and link global proteasome dysfunction to increased type I IFN production.

Authors

Anja Brehm, Yin Liu, Afzal Sheikh, Bernadette Marrero, Ebun Omoyinmi, Qing Zhou, Gina Montealegre, Angelique Biancotto, Adam Reinhardt, Adriana Almeida de Jesus, Martin Pelletier, Wanxia L. Tsai, Elaine F. Remmers, Lela Kardava, Suvimol Hill, Hanna Kim, Helen J. Lachmann, Andre Megarbane, Jae Jin Chae, Jilian Brady, Rhina D. Castillo, Diane Brown, Angel Vera Casano, Ling Gao, Dawn Chapelle, Yan Huang, Deborah Stone, Yongqing Chen, Franziska Sotzny, Chyi-Chia Richard Lee, Daniel L. Kastner, Antonio Torrelo, Abraham Zlotogorski, Susan Moir, Massimo Gadina, Phil McCoy, Robert Wesley, Kristina I. Rother, Peter W. Hildebrand, Paul Brogan, Elke Krüger, Ivona Aksentijevich, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky

×

Figure 7

Type I IFN induction in patients’ PBMCs and fibroblasts and in healthy control PBMCs treated in vitro with proteasome inhibitors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Type I IFN induction in patients’ PBMCs and fibroblasts and in healthy c...
(A) RNAseq was performed on whole-blood RNA. Differentially expressed genes in CANDLE/PRAAS patients (fold change > 2, P < 0.05) were analyzed by Ingenuity, and IFN-regulated genes were plotted on the heat map. (B) PBMCs from healthy controls were treated with indicated concentrations of the proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin for 24 hours. Expression of IFN genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Fold change was calculated for each condition relative to the mean of no-treatment controls. Data represent mean ± SEM. n = 8 for IFN genes and 200 nM concentration; n = 5 for all other concentrations; n = 4 for OAS3, MX1, and IL1B; n = 3 for IL6 and TNFA. Paired t tests were done using ΔCt values. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. (C) Expression levels of IFNB1, IFNA7, IFNA17, IFNA5, and IFNA21/1 from 3 CANDLE/PRAAS patients and 4 healthy donors were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Fold changes were calculated over the average of 4 healthy controls. Data represent mean ± SEM. n = 3. Two-sample t tests were performed. P values are stated. (D) Expression of IFNs from whole blood of 2 active CANDLE patients (patient 1 and patient 2) were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Expression of IFNs in PBMCs from a healthy donor treated with the proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin at indicated concentrations was analyzed by flow cytometry. (D and E) Representative results from n = 3 and n = 2, respectively.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts