Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • Hypoxia-inducible factors in disease pathophysiology and therapeutics (Oct 2020)
    • Latency in Infectious Disease (Jul 2020)
    • Immunotherapy in Hematological Cancers (Apr 2020)
    • Big Data's Future in Medicine (Feb 2020)
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Telomerase regulates MYC-driven oncogenesis independent of its reverse transcriptase activity
Cheryl M. Koh, … , Ernesto Guccione, Vinay Tergaonkar
Cheryl M. Koh, … , Ernesto Guccione, Vinay Tergaonkar
Published April 20, 2015
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(5):2109-2122. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI79134.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Telomerase regulates MYC-driven oncogenesis independent of its reverse transcriptase activity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Constitutively active MYC and reactivated telomerase often coexist in cancers. While reactivation of telomerase is thought to be essential for replicative immortality, MYC, in conjunction with cofactors, confers several growth advantages to cancer cells. It is known that the reactivation of TERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, is limiting for reconstituting telomerase activity in tumors. However, while reactivation of TERT has been functionally linked to the acquisition of several “hallmarks of cancer” in tumors, the molecular mechanisms by which this occurs and whether these mechanisms are distinct from the role of telomerase on telomeres is not clear. Here, we demonstrated that first-generation TERT-null mice, unlike Terc-null mice, show delayed onset of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis. We further determined that TERT is a regulator of MYC stability in cancer. TERT stabilized MYC levels on chromatin, contributing to either activation or repression of its target genes. TERT regulated MYC ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, and this effect of TERT was independent of its reverse transcriptase activity and role in telomere elongation. Based on these data, we conclude that reactivation of TERT, a direct transcriptional MYC target in tumors, provides a feed-forward mechanism to potentiate MYC-dependent oncogenesis.

Authors

Cheryl M. Koh, Ekta Khattar, Shi Chi Leow, Chia Yi Liu, Julius Muller, Wei Xia Ang, Yinghui Li, Guido Franzoso, Shang Li, Ernesto Guccione, Vinay Tergaonkar

×

Figure 1

Effect of acute depletion of TERT on MYC-driven lymphomas in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effect of acute depletion of TERT on MYC-driven lymphomas in vivo.
(A) W...
(A) Western blots showing levels of TERT, MYC, and actin in different tissues of EμMYC mice. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for mice xenografted with shControl, shTERT-A, shTERT-B, ectopic TERT, shTERT-A + ectopic TERT, shTERT-B + ectopic TERT, or shTerc EμMYC primary lymphoma cells. P < 0.01, shControl vs. shTERT-A and shTERT-B; P > 0.05, shControl vs. shTerc, TERT, shTERT-A + TERT, and shTERT-B + TERT. Weights of (C) tumors and (D) spleens of mice in B 1 month following transplant. Each dot represents an individual recipient mouse. The horizontal bars represent the mean. (E) P493 cells infected with shControl, shTERT1, shTERT2, shTERT3, TERT WT, TERT DN, shTERT3 + TERT WT, shTERT3 + TERT DN, and shTerc were xenografted into SCID recipient mice. P < 0.01, shControl vs. shTERT1, shTERT2, shTERT3; P > 0.05, shControl vs. shTERC; P < 0.01, shTERT3 vs. shTERT3 + TERT WT and shTERT3 + TERT DN. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. The number of animals is indicated by the graph. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was used to compare differences between the various groups and shControl. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, versus control.
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts