Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
BRAF inhibitor–associated ERK activation drives development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Niuscha Yaktapour, Frank Meiss, Justin Mastroianni, Thorsten Zenz, Hana Andrlova, Nimitha R. Mathew, Rainer Claus, Barbara Hutter, Stefan Fröhling, Benedikt Brors, Dietmar Pfeifer, Milena Pantic, Ingrid Bartsch, Timo S. Spehl, Philipp T. Meyer, Justus Duyster, Katja Zirlik, Tilman Brummer, Robert Zeiser
Niuscha Yaktapour, Frank Meiss, Justin Mastroianni, Thorsten Zenz, Hana Andrlova, Nimitha R. Mathew, Rainer Claus, Barbara Hutter, Stefan Fröhling, Benedikt Brors, Dietmar Pfeifer, Milena Pantic, Ingrid Bartsch, Timo S. Spehl, Philipp T. Meyer, Justus Duyster, Katja Zirlik, Tilman Brummer, Robert Zeiser
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

BRAF inhibitor–associated ERK activation drives development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Patients with BRAFV600E/K-driven melanoma respond to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib due to subsequent deactivation of the proliferative RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. In BRAF WT cells and those with mutations that activate or result in high levels of the BRAF activator RAS, BRAF inhibition can lead to ERK activation, resulting in tumorigenic transformation. We describe a patient with malignant melanoma who developed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the absence of RAS mutations during vemurafenib treatment. BRAF inhibition promoted patient CLL proliferation in culture and in murine xenografts and activated MEK/ERK in primary CLL cells from additional patients. BRAF inhibitor–driven ERK activity and CLL proliferation required B cell antigen receptor (BCR) activation, as inhibition of the BCR-proximal spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) reversed ERK hyperactivation and proliferation of CLL cells from multiple patients, while inhibition of the BCR-distal Bruton tyrosine kinase had no effect. Additionally, the RAS-GTP/RAS ratio in primary CLL cells exposed to vemurafenib was reduced upon SYK inhibition. BRAF inhibition increased mortality and CLL expansion in mice harboring CLL xenografts; however, SYK or MEK inhibition prevented CLL proliferation and increased animal survival. Together, these results suggest that BRAF inhibitors promote B cell malignancies in the absence of obvious mutations in RAS or other receptor tyrosine kinases and provide a rationale for combined BRAF/MEK or BRAF/SYK inhibition.

Authors

Niuscha Yaktapour, Frank Meiss, Justin Mastroianni, Thorsten Zenz, Hana Andrlova, Nimitha R. Mathew, Rainer Claus, Barbara Hutter, Stefan Fröhling, Benedikt Brors, Dietmar Pfeifer, Milena Pantic, Ingrid Bartsch, Timo S. Spehl, Philipp T. Meyer, Justus Duyster, Katja Zirlik, Tilman Brummer, Robert Zeiser

×

Figure 1

Clinical course of a melanoma patient with CLL progressing during treatment with vemurafenib.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Clinical course of a melanoma patient with CLL progressing during treatm...
Displayed are the white-cell count (A) and the lymphocyte count (B) at multiple time points prior to and after vemurafenib treatment (gray area). (C) A representative blood smear of the patient during vemurafenib treatment is shown. Original magnification, ×100; ×200 (inset). The dominant population has a mature lymphocyte phenotype. (D) Immunophenotyping of the white blood cells during vemurafenib treatment revealed a CD19+CD200+ population that could also be seen as CD19+CD5+ cells. (E) Combined CT and FDG PET scans obtained 1 month before the patient started taking vemurafenib and 6 weeks after vemurafenib was discontinued showed a partial response to treatment. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax; semi-quantitative measure of tumor glucose metabolism) decreased from 9.5 to 4.6 g/ml (–52%) in the parailiacal LN (red arrow) and from 6.6 g/ml to 1.9 g/ml (–71%) in the right inguinal LN (not shown). Arrows indicate melanoma metastasis. (F) Lambda light-chain restriction in CD19+ B lymphocytes on day 732 relative to treatment initiation is shown.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts