Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

The LD78β isoform of MIP-1α is the most potent CCR5 agonist and HIV-1–inhibiting chemokine
Patricia Menten, … , Paul Proost, Jo Van Damme
Patricia Menten, … , Paul Proost, Jo Van Damme
Published August 15, 1999
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1999;104(4):R1-R5. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI7318.
View: Text | PDF
Rapid Publication

The LD78β isoform of MIP-1α is the most potent CCR5 agonist and HIV-1–inhibiting chemokine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

LD78α and LD78β are 2 highly related nonallelic genes that code for different isoforms of the human CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α). Two molecular forms of natural LD78β (7.778 and 7.793 kDa) were identified from conditioned media of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Although LD78α and LD78β only differ in 3 amino acids, both LD78β variants were 100-fold more potent chemoattractants for mouse lymphocytes than was LD78α. On the contrary, LD78β was only 2-fold more efficient than LD78α in chemoattracting human lymphocytes and monocytes. Using CC chemokine receptor–transfected cells, both molecular forms of LD78β proved to be much more potent than LD78α in inducing an intracellular calcium rise through CCR5. Compared with LD78α and RANTES, this preferential binding of LD78β to CCR5 resulted in a 10- to 50-fold higher potency in inhibiting infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by CCR5-using (R5) HIV-1 strains. To date, LD78β is the most potent chemokine for inhibiting HIV-1 infection, and can be considered as a potentially important drug candidate for the treatment of infection with R5 HIV-1 strains.

Authors

Patricia Menten, Sofie Struyf, Evemie Schutyser, Anja Wuyts, Erik De Clercq, Dominique Schols, Paul Proost, Jo Van Damme

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 310 27
PDF 49 15
Figure 153 6
Citation downloads 51 0
Totals 563 48
Total Views 611
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts