LD78α and LD78β are 2 highly related nonallelic genes that code for different isoforms of the human CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α). Two molecular forms of natural LD78β (7.778 and 7.793 kDa) were identified from conditioned media of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Although LD78α and LD78β only differ in 3 amino acids, both LD78β variants were 100-fold more potent chemoattractants for mouse lymphocytes than was LD78α. On the contrary, LD78β was only 2-fold more efficient than LD78α in chemoattracting human lymphocytes and monocytes. Using CC chemokine receptor–transfected cells, both molecular forms of LD78β proved to be much more potent than LD78α in inducing an intracellular calcium rise through CCR5. Compared with LD78α and RANTES, this preferential binding of LD78β to CCR5 resulted in a 10- to 50-fold higher potency in inhibiting infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by CCR5-using (R5) HIV-1 strains. To date, LD78β is the most potent chemokine for inhibiting HIV-1 infection, and can be considered as a potentially important drug candidate for the treatment of infection with R5 HIV-1 strains.
Patricia Menten, Sofie Struyf, Evemie Schutyser, Anja Wuyts, Erik De Clercq, Dominique Schols, Paul Proost, Jo Van Damme
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 157 | 27 |
70 | 19 | |
Figure | 84 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 17 | 0 |
Totals | 328 | 52 |
Total Views | 380 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.