Usage Information

Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis
Ellen H. van den Bogaard, Judith G.M. Bergboer, Mieke Vonk-Bergers, Ivonne M.J.J. van Vlijmen-Willems, Stanleyson V. Hato, Pieter G.M. van der Valk, Jens Michael Schröder, Irma Joosten, Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen, Joost Schalkwijk
Ellen H. van den Bogaard, Judith G.M. Bergboer, Mieke Vonk-Bergers, Ivonne M.J.J. van Vlijmen-Willems, Stanleyson V. Hato, Pieter G.M. van der Valk, Jens Michael Schröder, Irma Joosten, Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen, Joost Schalkwijk
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis

Abstract

Topical application of coal tar is one of the oldest therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD), a T helper 2 (Th2) lymphocyte–mediated skin disease associated with loss-of-function mutations in the skin barrier gene, filaggrin (FLG). Despite its longstanding clinical use and efficacy, the molecular mechanism of coal tar therapy is unknown. Using organotypic skin models with primary keratinocytes from AD patients and controls, we found that coal tar activated the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), resulting in induction of epidermal differentiation. AHR knockdown by siRNA completely abrogated this effect. Coal tar restored filaggrin expression in FLG-haploinsufficient keratinocytes to wild-type levels, and counteracted Th2 cytokine–mediated downregulation of skin barrier proteins. In AD patients, coal tar completely restored expression of major skin barrier proteins, including filaggrin. Using organotypic skin models stimulated with Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13, we found coal tar to diminish spongiosis, apoptosis, and CCL26 expression, all AD hallmarks. Coal tar interfered with Th2 cytokine signaling via dephosphorylation of STAT6, most likely due to AHR-regulated activation of the NRF2 antioxidative stress pathway. The therapeutic effect of AHR activation herein described opens a new avenue to reconsider AHR as a pharmacological target and could lead to the development of mechanism-based drugs for AD.

Authors

Ellen H. van den Bogaard, Judith G.M. Bergboer, Mieke Vonk-Bergers, Ivonne M.J.J. van Vlijmen-Willems, Stanleyson V. Hato, Pieter G.M. van der Valk, Jens Michael Schröder, Irma Joosten, Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen, Joost Schalkwijk

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,609 971
PDF 163 118
Figure 526 10
Supplemental data 84 6
Citation downloads 115 0
Totals 2,497 1,105
Total Views 3,602
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement