Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Current therapy
  • Knowledge gap
  • Research advances
  • Recommendations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

The Attending Physician Free access | 10.1172/JCI62966

How much vitamin D should I take?

Cathleen S. Colón-Emeric, MDMHS1 and Kenneth W. Lyles, MD1,2

1Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Kenneth W. Lyles, DUMC 3881, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.660.7520; Fax: 919.684.8569; E-mail: kenneth.lyles@duke.edu.

Find articles by Colón-Emeric, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Kenneth W. Lyles, DUMC 3881, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.660.7520; Fax: 919.684.8569; E-mail: kenneth.lyles@duke.edu.

Find articles by Lyles, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 23, 2012 - More info

Published in Volume 122, Issue 5 on May 1, 2012
J Clin Invest. 2012;122(5):1598–1599. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI62966.
© 2012 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 23, 2012 - Version history
View PDF

Related article:

Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D–induced inhibition of bone mineralization
Liesbet Lieben, … , Roger Bouillon, Geert Carmeliet
Liesbet Lieben, … , Roger Bouillon, Geert Carmeliet
Research Article

Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D–induced inhibition of bone mineralization

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Serum calcium levels are tightly controlled by an integrated hormone-controlled system that involves active vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], which can elicit calcium mobilization from bone when intestinal calcium absorption is decreased. The skeletal adaptations, however, are still poorly characterized. To gain insight into these issues, we analyzed the consequences of specific vitamin D receptor (Vdr) inactivation in the intestine and in mature osteoblasts on calcium and bone homeostasis. We report here that decreased intestinal calcium absorption in intestine-specific Vdr knockout mice resulted in severely reduced skeletal calcium levels so as to ensure normal levels of calcium in the serum. Furthermore, increased 1,25(OH)2D levels not only stimulated bone turnover, leading to osteopenia, but also suppressed bone matrix mineralization. This resulted in extensive hyperosteoidosis, also surrounding the osteocytes, and hypomineralization of the entire bone cortex, which may have contributed to the increase in bone fractures. Mechanistically, osteoblastic VDR signaling suppressed calcium incorporation in bone by directly stimulating the transcription of genes encoding mineralization inhibitors. Ablation of skeletal Vdr signaling precluded this calcium transfer from bone to serum, leading to better preservation of bone mass and mineralization. These findings indicate that in mice, maintaining normocalcemia has priority over skeletal integrity, and that to minimize skeletal calcium storage, 1,25(OH)2D not only increases calcium release from bone, but also inhibits calcium incorporation in bone.

Authors

Liesbet Lieben, Ritsuko Masuyama, Sophie Torrekens, Riet Van Looveren, Jan Schrooten, Pieter Baatsen, Marie-Hélène Lafage-Proust, Tom Dresselaers, Jian Q. Feng, Lynda F. Bonewald, Mark B. Meyer, J. Wesley Pike, Roger Bouillon, Geert Carmeliet

×

Abstract

Clinical vignette: A 68-year-old woman consults you after a recent bone mineral density screening revealed osteopenia, total hip T score of –1.8. Further evaluation shows her only other abnormal lab value is a serum 25-hydroxy­vitamin D [25(OH)D] level of 13 ng/ml (normal 30–80). You find no evidence of malabsorption. What vitamin D supplement regimen should you recommend to reduce her risk of fractures?

Current therapy

There is a growing interest in vitamin D supplementation in older adults. Randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation prevents falls (1) and fractures (2, 3), at least in the 35%–60% of the population with insufficient serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels (4, 5). In addition, epidemiologic evidence links low vitamin D levels with a variety of illnesses, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, COPD, respiratory infections, autoimmune diseases, and cancers (6), although it remains to be proven that supplements prevent adverse outcomes in these diseases.

Knowledge gap

Vitamin D supplements are commercially available over the counter as ergocalciferol (D2) and cholecalciferol (D3; the form of vitamin D3 made in humans when ultraviolet light strikes the skin). Randomized trials demonstrating fall and fracture reduction have used both D2 and D3, with no clear pattern of results to suggest differential efficacy.

In 2010, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) increased the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of vitamin D to 600 IU daily for adults under 70 years, and 800 IU for adults 70 years and over, with an upper level intake of 4,000 IU daily. This recommendation was viewed as conservative by many in the field and fueled a debate about the appropriate target serum 25(OH)D level. Target levels are determined in part by the inflection point at which serum iPTH tends to rise in normal adults and in part from the results of randomized trials; a target 25(OH)D level of 20–30 ng/ml has been suggested as minimal for fall and fracture prevention. However, studies in healthy volunteers show that 700–1,000 IU of vitamin D per day will bring only about half of adults up to a 25(OH)D level of 30 ng/ml (7). Thus, adhering to the IOM RDA would result in a substantial proportion of older Americans remaining under recommended thresholds for fall and fracture prevention. When it is not possible to raise 25(OH)D levels with oral vitamin D2 or D3, some experts recommend exposing the arms and legs for 5–30 minutes (depending upon time of day, season, latitude, and skin pigmentation) between 10:00 am and 3:00 pm twice weekly (8). Alternatively, exposure to a minimal erythemal dose of sunlight or in a tanning booth while wearing a bathing suit is equivalent to taking approximately 20,000 IU vitamin D2 (8). Darker skin pigmentation and higher latitudes may decrease the effectiveness of this strategy.

Research advances

Similar serum 25(OH)D levels can be achieved with intermittent dosing; for example, 1,600 IU daily and 50,000 IU monthly schedules result in a similar proportion of patients reaching target levels at one year (6). High-dose trials have produced inconsistent results. One study providing 100,000 IU D3 quarterly was effective in reducing fractures in community-dwelling women (9), but another found that an annual intramuscular dose of 300,000 IU D2 was ineffective in preventing nonvertebral fractures in community-dwelling men and women (10), and an annual oral dose of oral 500,000 IU D3 paradoxically increased falls and fractures in elderly postmenopausal women (11).

Such unanticipated results are in part explained by the work of Lieben et al. in this issue of the JCI (12). They show that mice maintain serum calcium levels in a normal range at the expense of mineralizing skeletal tissue. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D (i.e., D3), stimulates calcium absorption by the gut as well as skeletal resorption, thus maintaining serum calcium levels within a narrow range. The authors further show that 1,25(OH)2D stimulates the production of inorganic pyrophosphate and small integrin binding ligand N-linked glycoprotein, both inhibitors of mineralization of osteoid tissue in bone. Are there clinical implications of these findings? Perhaps. In the study by Smith et al. (10), in which annual 300,000 IU D2 was ineffective in preventing fractures, 1,25(OH)2D levels were found to be increased, which may have led to increased skeletal resorption and impaired bone formation. Thus, the present work offers one explanation why high intermittent doses of vitamin D2 or D3 do not reduce, and may actually increase, fracture rates.

Recommendations

Given the relative safety of vitamin D within a wide serum range, the IOM recommendations appear overly cautious, and a higher dose of at least 1,000–1,200 IU daily appears prudent. For the patient described above, we would prescribe 50,000 IU D2 orally weekly for six weeks, followed by 2,000 IU D3 daily. Based on the recent work by Lieben et al. and others, we do not recommend high-dose intermittent vitamin D until a better understanding of its effect on bone, falls, and fractures is achieved.

Acknowledgments

K.W. Lyles is supported by NIH grant 2PAG028716-06.

Address correspondence to: Kenneth W. Lyles, DUMC 3881, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.660.7520; Fax: 919.684.8569; E-mail: kenneth.lyles@duke.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(5):1598–1599. doi:10.1172/JCI62966.

See the related article at Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D–induced inhibition of bone mineralization.

References
  1. Bischoff-Ferrari H, et al. Effect of vitamin D on falls: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291(16):1999–2006.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Avenell A, Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, O’Connell DL. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD000227.
  3. Bischoff-Ferrari H, Willett W, Wong J, Giovannucci E, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Fracture prevention with vitamin D. JAMA. 2005;293(18):2257–2264.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Pieper CF, et al. Distribution and correlates of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a sample of patients with hip fracture. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):335–340.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  5. Tangpricha V, Pearce E, Chen T, Holick M. Vitamin D insufficiency among free-living healthy young adults. Am J Med. 2002;112(8):659–662.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Barnard K, Colón-Emeric C. Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D in older adults: Cardiovascular disease, mortality, mood, and cognition. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8(1):4–33.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Bischoff-Ferrari H. How to select the doses of vitamin D in the management of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(4):401–407.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  8. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–281.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT. Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326(7387):469.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Smith H, Anderson F, Raphael H, Maslin P, Crozier S, Cooper C. Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women—a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(12):1852–1857.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  11. Sanders KM, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(18):1815–1822.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  12. Lieben L, et al. Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D–induced inhibition of bone mineralization. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(5):1803–1815.
    View this article via: JCI Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 23, 2012): No description
  • Version 2 (May 1, 2012): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Current therapy
  • Knowledge gap
  • Research advances
  • Recommendations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts