Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Hindsight Free access | 10.1172/JCI62589

Endothelium: from cellophane to orchestral maestro

Ralph L. Nachman

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

Address correspondence to: Ralph L. Nachman, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, Box 305, New York, New York 10065, USA. Phone: 212.746.7723; Fax: 212.746.8343; E-mail: rlnachm@med.cornell.edu.

Find articles by Nachman, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published March 1, 2012 - More info

Published in Volume 122, Issue 3 on March 1, 2012
J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):796–797. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI62589.
© 2012 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published March 1, 2012 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Endothelial cells from human umbilical veins were first cultured nearly four decades ago, initiating explosive growth in research in vascular biology and leading to major insights into angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and tumor biology. Recent studies now promise to open new horizons in regenerative medicine as well as organ engineering.

In 1973, the JCI published two back-to-back papers from my laboratory, reporting the first successful in vitro culture of endothelial cells from human umbilical veins (1, 2). Over the last four decades, these papers have been listed among the most highly cited articles in the journal’s history (7,024 times as of this writing). In 2004, as part of the 80th anniversary of the JCI, Eric Jaffe and I reviewed the history of our somewhat circuitous and serendipitous journey leading to this discovery (3).

The project was driven by our realization that the endothelial cell was the key to understanding how the vascular wall worked in health and disease. We had learned much from studying the platelet, but it was clear that the orchestral leader in hemostasis had to be the endothelial cell. This sounds obvious now, but the prevailing view at the time was that endothelium should be regarded as analogous to the inner tube of a tire, what Lord Florey referred to as a “sheet of nucleated cellophane” (4, 5). How times have changed!

The two papers had a catalytic effect on the growth and development of the field of vascular biology by developing a workable approach to the endothelial cell using an available human tissue source (umbilical veins) to grow a pure population of cells using a definitive marker, vWF. The next year, Gimbrone, Cotran, and Folkman (6) corroborated the system, and the flood gates began to open; the number of related publications has grown dramatically since then.

The ability to culture the endothelial cell allowed researchers to understand and appreciate its role as the director of thromboregulation with important clinical implications. A number of inherited thrombophilic states were shown to be associated with abnormalities of inherent constitutive endothelial nonthrombogenic functions (Figure 1). In addition, the endothelium at rest maintains blood fluidity by cross-talk with platelets. In the activated nonconstitutive state, the endothelium plays a major role in the pathophysiology of conditions such as cancer and inflammation. In some activated conditions, including atherosclerotic disease and thrombosis, the endothelial cell synthesizes membrane-associated adhesion molecules including vWF, generates membrane assembly of modulators of thrombin generation, and at the same time downregulates the anticoagulant, antifibrinolytic thrombomodulin system (7).

The endothelial cell symphony.Figure 1

The endothelial cell symphony. The endothelial cells conduct luminal constitutive, anticoagulant, and antiinflammatory functions as well as nonconstitutive, activated, thromboregulatory activities. Furthermore, these cells secrete angiocrines, which orchestrate a number of different pathways, including embryonic organogenesis, hematopoiesis, metastasis, and lung and liver regeneration.

The endothelial cell and the megakaryocyte are the only cells that synthesize vWF, strengthening the concept of a functional endothelial cell–megakaryocyte axis. The orchestration of platelet and endothelial secretion and release of intracellular constituents significantly influences the behavior of the vascular bed. Platelet production is supported by intravascular proplatelet formation after direct contact between marrow sinusoidal endothelium and megakaryocytes. There is abundant molecular cross-talk between these two cell systems, conversations that in steady state constitute a mechanism for the biochemical nourishment and stabilization of the intact vessel wall.

The exciting studies performed over the last several decades on endothelial cell biology have lead to tremendous insights into the fundamental processes of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, cancer research, and even our understanding of organ development and regeneration. Bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells have been shown to participate in adult vasculogenesis or new vessel formation by directly seeding preconditioned sites and acting in concert with hematopoietic precursors. Blocking this process interferes with tumor growth (8). In addition, endothelial cells in the marrow — via production of specific stem and progenitor cell trophogen factors (angiocrines) — directly control hematopoietic stem cell self renewal as well as differentiation (9). The recently recognized molecular heterogeneity of specialized vascular beds in different organs has highlighted the controlling influence of specific microenvironmental signals on organ function and development. Thus, organ-specific angiocrines promote hematopoiesis in the bone marrow as well as regeneration in the liver and lung (10, 11).

The future promises major new endothelial cell developments in regenerative medicine and eventually organ engineering. We have come a long way from our conception of endothelium as inert cellophane to our current appreciation of it as a cellular orchestral maestro.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):796–797. doi:10.1172/JCI62589.

References
  1. Jaffe ES, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins: identification of morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):2745–2756.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Jaffe ES, Hoyer LW, Nachman RL. Synthesis of antihemophilic factor antigen by cultured human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):2757–2764.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  3. Nachman RL, Jaffe EA. Endothelial cell culture: beginnings of modern vascular biology. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(8):1037–1040.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Florey L. The endothelial cell. Br Med J. 1966;2:487–490.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Kaiser L, Sparks HV. Endothelial cells. Not just cellophane wrapper. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(3):569–573.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Gimbrone MA, Cotran RS, Folkman J. Human vascular endothelial cells in culture. Growth and DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol. 1974;60(3):673–684.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Stern DM, Kaiser E, Naworth P. Regulation of the coagulation system by vascular endothelial cells. Haemostasis. 1988;18(4–6):202–214.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Lyden D, et al. Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat Med. 2001;7(11):1194–1201.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Kobayashi H, et al. Angiocrine factors from Akt-activated endothelial cells balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;11(9):1046–1056.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Ding BS, et al. Inductive angiocrine signals from sinusoidal endothelium and required for liver regeneration. Nature. 2010;468(7321):310–315.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  11. Ding BS, et al. Endothelial-derived angiocrine signals induce and sustain regenerative lung alveolarization. Cell. 2011;147(3):539–553.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (March 1, 2012): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts