Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Aging (Upcoming)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Mechanisms of immunotherapeutic intervention by anti-CD40L (CD154) antibody in an animal model of multiple sclerosis
Laurence M. Howard, … , Randolph J. Noelle, Stephen D. Miller
Laurence M. Howard, … , Randolph J. Noelle, Stephen D. Miller
Published January 15, 1999
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1999;103(2):281-290. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI5388.
View: Text | PDF
Article

Mechanisms of immunotherapeutic intervention by anti-CD40L (CD154) antibody in an animal model of multiple sclerosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (R-EAE) in the SJL mouse is a Th1-mediated autoimmune demyelinating disease model for human multiple sclerosis and is characterized by infiltration of the central nervous system (CNS) by Th1 cells and macrophages. Disease relapses are mediated by T cells specific for endogenous myelin epitopes released during acute disease, reflecting a critical role for epitope spreading in the perpetuation of chronic central CNS pathology. We asked whether blockade of the CD40–CD154 (CD40L) costimulatory pathway could suppress relapses in mice with established R-EAE. Anti-CD154 antibody treatment at either the peak of acute disease or during remission effectively blocked clinical disease progression and CNS inflammation. This treatment blocked Th1 differentiation and effector function rather than expansion of myelin-specific T cells. Although T-cell proliferation and production of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 were normal, antibody treatment severely inhibited interferon-γ production, myelin peptide–specific delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, and induction of encephalitogenic effector cells. Anti-CD154 antibody treatment also impaired the expression of clinical disease in adoptive recipients of encephalitogenic T cells, suggesting that CD40–CD154 interactions may be involved in directing the CNS migration of these cells and/or in their effector ability to activate CNS macrophages/microglia. Thus, blockade of CD154–CD40 interactions is a promising immunotherapeutic strategy for treatment of ongoing T cell–mediated autoimmune diseases.

Authors

Laurence M. Howard, Amy J. Miga, Carol L. Vanderlugt, Mauro C. Dal Canto, Jon D. Laman, Randolph J. Noelle, Stephen D. Miller

×

Figure 1

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Anti-CD154 inhibits clinical progression of established R-EAE. Mice were...
Anti-CD154 inhibits clinical progression of established R-EAE. Mice were primed with PLP139-151/CFA as described in Methods. Mice were treated with either anti-CD154 or control hamster IgG at time of priming (a), at the peak of acute disease (b) (square symbols), or during the remission following recovery from acute disease (b) (triangular symbols). The data are expressed as the mean clinical score versus days after immunization for mice treated at the time of immunization (a), or as relapse rate for those mice treated during ongoing disease (b). Data shown are representative of two similar experiments. Ab, antibody; R-EAE, relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts