Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Dynamic regulation of gastric surface pH by luminal pH
Shaoyou Chu, … , Jonathan D. Kaunitz, Marshall H. Montrose
Shaoyou Chu, … , Jonathan D. Kaunitz, Marshall H. Montrose
Published March 1, 1999
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1999;103(5):605-612. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI5217.
View: Text | PDF
Article

Dynamic regulation of gastric surface pH by luminal pH

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In vivo confocal imaging of the mucosal surface of rat stomach was used to measure pH noninvasively under the mucus gel layer while simultaneously imaging mucus gel thickness and tissue architecture. When tissue was superfused at pH 3, the 25 μm adjacent to the epithelial surface was relatively alkaline (pH 4.1 ± 0.1), and surface alkalinity was enhanced by topical dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (pH 4.8 ± 0.2). Luminal pH was changed from pH 3 to pH 5 to mimic the fasted-to-fed transition in intragastric pH in rats. Under pH 5 superfusion, surface pH was relatively acidic (pH 4.2 ± 0.2). This surface acidity was enhanced by pentagastrin (pH 3.5 ± 0.2) and eliminated by omeprazole, implicating parietal cell H,K-ATPase as the dominant regulator of surface pH under pH 5 superfusion. With either pH 5 or pH 3 superfusion (a) gastric pit lumens had the most divergent pH from luminal superfusates; (b) qualitatively similar results were observed with and without superfusion flow; (c) local mucus gel thickness was a poor predictor of surface pH values; and (d) no channels carrying primary gastric gland fluid through the mucus were observed. The model of gastric defense that includes an alkaline mucus gel and viscous fingering of secreted acid through the mucus may be appropriate at the intragastric pH of the fasted, but not fed, animal.

Authors

Shaoyou Chu, Shin Tanaka, Jonathan D. Kaunitz, Marshall H. Montrose

×

Figure 5

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Relationship between surface pH and mucus gel thickness during pH 3 supe...
Relationship between surface pH and mucus gel thickness during pH 3 superfusion in the absence or presence of PGE2. (a) Confocal fluorescence ratio image, with correspondence of pseudocolor to pH shown in the bar. In the absence of any addition to superfusate, surface pH was alkaline and gastric pits (p) were more alkaline than surface. (b) The same tissue imaged 3 min after topical 10 μg/ml dm-PGE2. (c) Surface pH was averaged from the space 25 μm adjacent to the mucosal surface and correlated versus gel thickness at the pH measurement site in the same image. Scatter plot of individual measurements of surface pH and gel thickness in absence of any addition (open triangles) (n = 574 measurements, 11 animals) and 2–5 min after addition of 10 μg/ml topical dm-PGE2 (closed circles; n = 325 measurements, 3 animals). (d) Compilation of results from pH 3 superfusion without (gray bars) or with (blue bars) dm-PGE2 treatment. Gel thickness was grouped in values of 25 μm. Surface pH values are mean ± SEM (n = 6–197 measurements in different groups). dm-PGE2, dimethyl PGE2; PGE2, prostaglandin2.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts