Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Upcoming)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells induce tumor cell resistance to cytotoxic T cells in mice
Tangying Lu, … , Michael B. Sporn, Dmitry Gabrilovich
Tangying Lu, … , Michael B. Sporn, Dmitry Gabrilovich
Published September 12, 2011
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):4015-4029. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45862.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells induce tumor cell resistance to cytotoxic T cells in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancer immunotherapeutic approaches induce tumor-specific immune responses, in particular CTL responses, in many patients treated. However, such approaches are clinically beneficial to only a few patients. We set out to investigate one possible explanation for the failure of CTLs to eliminate tumors, specifically, the concept that this failure is not dependent on inhibition of T cell function. In a previous study, we found that in mice, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a source of the free radical peroxynitrite (PNT). Here, we show that pre-treatment of mouse and human tumor cells with PNT or with MDSCs inhibits binding of processed peptides to tumor cell–associated MHC, and as a result, tumor cells become resistant to antigen-specific CTLs. This effect was abrogated in MDSCs treated with a PNT inhibitor. In a mouse model of tumor-associated inflammation in which the antitumor effects of antigen-specific CTLs are eradicated by expression of IL-1β in the tumor cells, we determined that therapeutic failure was not caused by more profound suppression of CTLs by IL-1β–expressing tumors than tumors not expressing this proinflammatory cytokine. Rather, therapeutic failure was a result of the presence of PNT. Clinical relevance for these data was suggested by the observation that myeloid cells were the predominant source of PNT in human lung, pancreatic, and breast cancer samples. Our data therefore suggest what we believe to be a novel mechanism of MDSC-mediated tumor cell resistance to CTLs.

Authors

Tangying Lu, Rupal Ramakrishnan, Soner Altiok, Je-In Youn, Pingyan Cheng, Esteban Celis, Vladimir Pisarev, Simon Sherman, Michael B. Sporn, Dmitry Gabrilovich

×

Figure 8

Inhibition of PNT production improves the antitumor effect of adoptive T cell transfer.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Inhibition of PNT production improves the antitumor effect of adoptive T...
(A) The number of NT+ cells per 10 high-power fields (800 × 600 mm2) in LLC-OVA and LLC-IL-1β-OVA tumors 5 days after treatment with 150 mg/kg CDDO-Me or control diets. Cumulative results of 3 mice per group.*P < 0.05. (B) Combined effect of CDDO-Me and T cell transfer on growth of LLC-OVA tumor. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with control and CDDO-Me diets for 5 days with 3 days interval started on day –2. OT-1 T cells were injected on days 1 and 8. Each group included 4–5 mice. The differences between CDDO-Me + OT-1 and other groups were significant (P = 0.01). (C) Combined effect of CDDO-Me and T cell transfer on growth of LLC-IL-1β-OVA tumor. All mice received TBI and bone marrow transfer on day 0. Each group included 4 mice. The differences between CDDO-Me + OT-1 and other groups were significant (P < 0.05). (D) Effect of T cell transfer on tumor growth of LLC-H-2Kb-SIINFEKL tumor. Each group included 4–5 mice. (E and F) Combined effect of CDDO-Me and T cell transfer on growth of B16-F10 (E) or H-2Kb– B16-F10 (F) tumors. Pmel-1 T cells were injected on days 1 and 8 into mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma (E) and OT-1 T cells to mice bearing H-2Kb– B16F-10 melanoma. Each group included 4–5 mice. The differences between CDDO-Me + T cells and other groups were significant (P = 0.04). In E but not in F (P > 0.1). (B–F) Mean ± SEM is shown. Tumor-bearing mice were treated as described in B. (G) Schematic of proposed effect of myeloid cells on tumor cell resistance to CTLs. Prf, perforin; GrzB, granzyme B. Red circles: processed antigen; brown: nitrated amino acids.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts