Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(8):2979-2988. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI40252.
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasis remains the leading ca use of death for cancer patients. Opportunities to improve treatment outcomes for patients require new methods to study and view the biology of metastatic progression. Here, we describe an ex vivo pulmonary metastasis assay (PuMA) in which the metastatic progression of GFP-expressing cancer cells, from a single cell to the formation of multicellular colonies, in the mouse lung microenvironment was assessed in real time for up to 21 days. The biological validity of this assay was confirmed by its prediction of the in vivo behavior of a variety of high- and low-metastatic human and mouse cancer cell lines and the discrimination of tumor microenvironments in the lung that were most permissive to metastasis. Using this approach, we provide what we believe to be new insights into the importance of tumor cell interactions with the stromal components of the lung microenvironment. Finally, the translational utility of this assay was demonstrated through its use in the evaluation of therapeutics at discrete time points during metastatic progression. We believe that this assay system is uniquely capable of advancing our understanding of both metastasis biology and therapeutic strategies.
Authors
Arnulfo Mendoza, Sung-Hyeok Hong, Tanasa Osborne, Mohammed A. Khan, Kirk Campbell, Joseph Briggs, Ananth Eleswarapu, Lauren Buquo, Ling Ren, Stephen M. Hewitt, El-H. Dakir, Susan Garfield, Renard Walker, Glenn Merlino, Jeffrey E. Green, Kent W. Hunter, Lalage M. Wakefield, Chand Khanna
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 788 | 161 |
| 136 | 30 | |
| Figure | 421 | 5 |
| Table | 74 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 48 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,520 | 201 |
| Total Views | 1,721 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)