Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Targeting fibroblast activation protein inhibits tumor stromagenesis and growth in mice
Angélica M. Santos, … , Joseph L. Kissil, Ellen Puré
Angélica M. Santos, … , Joseph L. Kissil, Ellen Puré
Published November 16, 2009
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2009;119(12):3613-3625. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38988.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Targeting fibroblast activation protein inhibits tumor stromagenesis and growth in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Membrane-bound proteases have recently emerged as critical mediators of tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, and metastasis. However, the mechanisms by which they regulate these processes remain unknown. As the cell surface serine protease fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is selectively expressed on tumor-associated fibroblasts and pericytes in epithelial tumors, we set out to investigate the role of FAP in mouse models of epithelial-derived solid tumors. In this study, we demonstrate that genetic deletion and pharmacologic inhibition of FAP inhibited tumor growth in both an endogenous mouse model of lung cancer driven by the K-rasG12D mutant and a mouse model of colon cancer, in which CT26 mouse colon cancer cells were transplanted into immune competent syngeneic mice. Interestingly, growth of only the K-rasG12D–driven lung tumors was also attenuated by inhibition of the closely related protease dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV). Our results indicate that FAP depletion inhibits tumor cell proliferation indirectly, increases accumulation of collagen, decreases myofibroblast content, and decreases blood vessel density in tumors. These data provide proof of principle that targeting stromal cell–mediated modifications of the tumor microenvironment may be an effective approach to treating epithelial-derived solid tumors.

Authors

Angélica M. Santos, Jason Jung, Nazneen Aziz, Joseph L. Kissil, Ellen Puré

×

Figure 6

Deletion of FAP increases p21WAF1 via ECM-mediated signaling through FAK and ERK.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Deletion of FAP increases p21WAF1 via ECM-mediated signaling through FAK...
FAK and ERK1/2 were immunoprecipitated from total extracts of CT26 tumors isolated from Fap+/+ and FapLacZ/LacZ mice, and the immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for (A) phospho-FAKY397 and total FAK and (B) ERK and phospho-ERK. (C) p21WAF1 immunoblot of total CT26 extracts from Fap+/+ and FapLacZ/LacZ mice resolved by SDS-PAGE (2 representative samples from a total of 10 per group are shown for each immunoprecipitate/immunoblot). Lanes were run on the same gel but were noncontiguous (white lines). (D–F) Quantification by densitometry for all 10 samples from each group for each immunoprecipitate/immunoblot. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts