Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Upcoming)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
NFATc1 in mice represses osteoprotegerin during osteoclastogenesis and dissociates systemic osteopenia from inflammation in cherubism
Antonios O. Aliprantis, … , Bjorn R. Olsen, Laurie H. Glimcher
Antonios O. Aliprantis, … , Bjorn R. Olsen, Laurie H. Glimcher
Published October 9, 2008
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2008;118(11):3775-3789. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI35711.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone Biology

NFATc1 in mice represses osteoprotegerin during osteoclastogenesis and dissociates systemic osteopenia from inflammation in cherubism

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Osteoporosis results from an imbalance in skeletal remodeling that favors bone resorption over bone formation. Bone matrix is degraded by osteoclasts, which differentiate from myeloid precursors in response to the cytokine RANKL. To gain insight into the transcriptional regulation of bone resorption during growth and disease, we generated a conditional knockout of the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (Nfatc1). Deletion of Nfatc1 in young mice resulted in osteopetrosis and inhibition of osteoclastogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Transcriptional profiling revealed NFATc1 as a master regulator of the osteoclast transcriptome, promoting the expression of numerous genes needed for bone resorption. In addition, NFATc1 directly repressed osteoclast progenitor expression of osteoprotegerin, a decoy receptor for RANKL previously thought to be an osteoblast-derived inhibitor of bone resorption. “Cherubism mice”, which carry a gain-of-function mutation in SH3-domain binding protein 2 (Sh3bp2), develop osteoporosis and widespread inflammation dependent on the proinflammatory cytokine, TNF-α. Interestingly, deletion of Nfatc1 protected cherubism mice from systemic bone loss but did not inhibit inflammation. Taken together, our study demonstrates that NFATc1 is required for remodeling of the growing and adult skeleton and suggests that NFATc1 may be an effective therapeutic target for osteoporosis associated with inflammatory states.

Authors

Antonios O. Aliprantis, Yasuyoshi Ueki, Rosalyn Sulyanto, Arnold Park, Kirsten S. Sigrist, Sudarshana M. Sharma, Michael C. Ostrowski, Bjorn R. Olsen, Laurie H. Glimcher

×

Figure 4

Comparative microarray analysis reveals 2 sets of NFATc1-regulated genes in osteoclasts.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Comparative microarray analysis reveals 2 sets of NFATc1-regulated genes...
(A) Microarray signal intensities for selected NFATc1-dependent mRNAs from Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ MROcPs. (B) qRT-PCR analysis for the expression of the NFATc1-dependent mRNAs identified in A in Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ BMOcPs stimulated with M-CSF or M-CSF and RANKL for 3 days. (C) Microarray signal intensities for selected NFATc1-augmented mRNAs from Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ MROcPs. (D) qRT-PCR analysis for the expression of the NFATc1-augmented mRNAs identified in C in Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ BMOcPs stimulated with M-CSF or M-CSF and RANKL for 3 days. (E) qRT-PCR analysis for the expression of the Nfatc1 mRNA isoforms in Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ BMOcPs stimulated with M-CSF or M-CSF and RANKL for 3 days. PCR primers targeted the deleted exon (Nfatc1ex3) or the Nfatc1/A isoform (see Table 1). Note that the qRT-PCR analyses presented in B, D, and E were performed on the same mRNA samples and are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. (F) qRT-PCR analysis for the expression of Nfatc1/A mRNA in NFATc2 sufficient (Nfatc2+/+) and deficient (Nfatc2–/–) Nfatc1fl/fl and Nfatc1Δ/Δ BMOcPs stimulated with M-CSF or M-CSF and RANKL for 4 days. The data in F are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts