Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Cardiomyocyte expression of PPARγ leads to cardiac dysfunction in mice
Ni-Huiping Son, … , Li-Shin Huang, Ira J. Goldberg
Ni-Huiping Son, … , Li-Shin Huang, Ira J. Goldberg
Published October 1, 2007
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2007;117(10):2791-2801. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI30335.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism

Cardiomyocyte expression of PPARγ leads to cardiac dysfunction in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Three forms of PPARs are expressed in the heart. In animal models, PPARγ agonist treatment improves lipotoxic cardiomyopathy; however, PPARγ agonist treatment of humans is associated with peripheral edema and increased heart failure. To directly assess effects of increased PPARγ on heart function, we created transgenic mice expressing PPARγ1 in the heart via the cardiac α–myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) promoter. PPARγ1-transgenic mice had increased cardiac expression of fatty acid oxidation genes and increased lipoprotein triglyceride (TG) uptake. Unlike in cardiac PPARα-transgenic mice, heart glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) mRNA expression and glucose uptake were not decreased. PPARγ1-transgenic mice developed a dilated cardiomyopathy associated with increased lipid and glycogen stores, distorted architecture of the mitochondrial inner matrix, and disrupted cristae. Thus, while PPARγ agonists appear to have multiple beneficial effects, their direct actions on the myocardium have the potential to lead to deterioration in heart function.

Authors

Ni-Huiping Son, Tae-Sik Park, Haruyo Yamashita, Masayoshi Yokoyama, Lesley A. Huggins, Kazue Okajima, Shunichi Homma, Matthias J. Szabolcs, Li-Shin Huang, Ira J. Goldberg

×

Figure 4

Increased cardiac glucose uptake and glycogen storage in MHC-PPARγ1 male mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Increased cardiac glucose uptake and glycogen storage in MHC-PPARγ1 male...
(A) 2-Deoxy-d-[3H]glucose uptake into heart of MHC-PPARγ1 and wild-type control mice. MHC-PPARγ1L mice were 8 months old (n = 7 in each group); MHC-PPARγ1H mice were 4 months old (n = 6 in each group). (B) PAS staining of heart tissue from 8-month-old MHC-PPARγ1L female mice (middle panel) and littermate controls (left panel) after 6-hour fasting (original magnification, ×400). The arrow shows focal increased staining. Glycogen content was quantified using Molecular Analysis software (n = 3–4 per group) and normalized to values for PAS-staining controls (set as 1.0) (right panel). G, glycogen. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 compared with littermate controls; **P < 0.01. (C) The glycogen staining was removed by PAS diastase (PAS-D) digestion (left and middle panels), and the data were quantified using Molecular Analysis software (right panel).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts