Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IgG-blocking antibodies inhibit IgE-mediated anaphylaxis in vivo through both antigen interception and FcγRIIb cross-linking
Richard T. Strait, … , Suzanne C. Morris, Fred D. Finkelman
Richard T. Strait, … , Suzanne C. Morris, Fred D. Finkelman
Published March 1, 2006
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2006;116(3):833-841. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI25575.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

IgG-blocking antibodies inhibit IgE-mediated anaphylaxis in vivo through both antigen interception and FcγRIIb cross-linking

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Although it has long been hypothesized that allergen immunotherapy inhibits allergy, in part, by inducing production of IgG Abs that intercept allergens before they can cross-link mast cell FcεRI-associated IgE, this blocking Ab hypothesis has never been tested in vivo. In addition, evidence that IgG-allergen interactions can induce anaphylaxis by activating macrophages through FcγRIII suggested that IgG Ab might not be able to inhibit IgE-mediated anaphylaxis without inducing anaphylaxis through this alternative pathway. We have studied active and passive immunization models in mice to approach these issues and to determine whether any inhibition of anaphylaxis observed was a direct effect of allergen neutralization by IgG Ab or an indirect effect of cross-linking of FcεRI to the inhibitory IgG receptor FcγRIIb. We demonstrate that IgG Ab produced during the course of an immune response or administered passively can completely suppress IgE-mediated anaphylaxis; that these IgG blocking Abs inhibit IgE-mediated anaphylaxis without inducing FcγRIII-mediated anaphylaxis only when IgG Ab concentration is high and challenge allergen dose is low; that allergen epitope density correlates inversely with the allergen dose required to induce both IgE- and FcγRIII-mediated anaphylaxis; and that both allergen interception and FcγRIIb-dependent inhibition contribute to in vivo blocking Ab activity.

Authors

Richard T. Strait, Suzanne C. Morris, Fred D. Finkelman

×

Figure 2

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IgE/FcεRI/mast cell–dependent anaphylaxis in GαMD-primed mice requires c...
IgE/FcεRI/mast cell–dependent anaphylaxis in GαMD-primed mice requires challenge with a high dose of Ag. Mice (4–5 per group) were primed s.c. with 0.2 ml of GαMD, then challenged i.v. 14 days later with GIgG. Temperature was followed for 2 hours after challenge, and the maximum temperature decrease was calculated. Mice were matched for genetic background in all experiments. (A) WT mice and mice deficient in FcγRIII, IgE, or both were challenged as shown. (B) WT (+) and mast cell–deficient W/Wv (–) mice were treated as shown. (C) BALB/c mice were injected 15–30 minutes before challenge with 66 μg of CV6209 (PAF antagonist), 0.2 mg of both triprolidine and cimetidine (H1 and H2 antagonists), all 3 antagonists, or no antagonist and challenged as shown. (D) BALB/c mice were injected i.v. with 1 mg of gadolinium (macrophage inhibitor) or saline 1 day before GIgG challenge. (E) BALB/c mice were injected s.c. with saline or 500 μg of anti–FcγRII/RIII mAb 1 day before GIgG challenge. Blood was drawn 2 hours after GIgG challenge, and MMCP-1 levels were determined. (F) BALB/c mice were injected s.c. with saline or 500 μg of anti–FcγRII/RIII mAb 1 day before GIgG challenge. Anticoagulated blood was obtained for histamine measurement 5 minutes after challenge. (G) BALB/c mice were bled 4 hours after challenge with the indicated dose of GIgG, and IL-4 secretion was evaluated by in vivo cytokine capture assay (IVCCA) (51). *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts