Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
GPR109A (PUMA-G/HM74A) mediates nicotinic acid–induced flushing
Zoltán Benyó, … , Klaus Pfeffer, Stefan Offermanns
Zoltán Benyó, … , Klaus Pfeffer, Stefan Offermanns
Published December 1, 2005
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2005;115(12):3634-3640. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23626.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Dermatology

GPR109A (PUMA-G/HM74A) mediates nicotinic acid–induced flushing

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Nicotinic acid (niacin) has long been used as an antidyslipidemic drug. Its special profile of actions, especially the rise in HDL-cholesterol levels induced by nicotinic acid, is unique among the currently available pharmacological tools to treat lipid disorders. Recently, a G-protein–coupled receptor, termed GPR109A (HM74A in humans, PUMA-G in mice), was described and shown to mediate the nicotinic acid–induced antilipolytic effects in adipocytes. One of the major problems of the pharmacotherapeutical use of nicotinic acid is a strong flushing response. This side effect, although harmless, strongly affects patient compliance. In the present study, we show that mice lacking PUMA-G did not show nicotinic acid–induced flushing. In addition, flushing in response to nicotinic acid was also abrogated in the absence of cyclooxygenase type 1, and mice lacking prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptors had reduced flushing responses. The mouse orthologue of GPR109A, PUMA-G, is highly expressed in macrophages and other immune cells, and transplantation of wild-type bone marrow into irradiated PUMA-G–deficient mice restored the nicotinic acid–induced flushing response. Our data clearly indicate that GPR109A mediates nicotinic acid–induced flushing and that this effect involves release of PGE2 and PGD2, most likely from immune cells of the skin.

Authors

Zoltán Benyó, Andreas Gille, Jukka Kero, Marion Csiky, Marie Catherine Suchánková, Rolf M. Nüsing, Alexandra Moers, Klaus Pfeffer, Stefan Offermanns

×

Figure 2

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
COX-1 but not eNOS is required for NA-induced flushing. (A–C) Original L...
COX-1 but not eNOS is required for NA-induced flushing. (A–C) Original LDF recordings (A and B) and quantitative analysis of the percentage of LDF increase (C) after i.p. administration of 200 mg/kg NA indicate normal first and second peaks of the flushing response in eNOS–/– mice (B and C, black bars, n = 9) compared with wild-type littermate controls (A and C, white bars, n = 9). (D–F) Original LDF recordings (D and E) and quantitative analysis of the percentage of LDF increase (F) after administration of NA to COX-1–/– mice (E and F, black bars, n = 7) and wild-type littermates (D and F, white bars, n = 6). **P = 0.002, ***P < 0.001 vs. COX-1+/+.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts