Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • Hypoxia-inducible factors in disease pathophysiology and therapeutics (Oct 2020)
    • Latency in Infectious Disease (Jul 2020)
    • Immunotherapy in Hematological Cancers (Apr 2020)
    • Big Data's Future in Medicine (Feb 2020)
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Spinal inflammatory hyperalgesia is mediated by prostaglandin E receptors of the EP2 subtype
Heiko Reinold, … , Ulrike Müller, Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer
Heiko Reinold, … , Ulrike Müller, Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer
Published March 1, 2005
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2005;115(3):673-679. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23618.
View: Text | PDF
Article Neuroscience

Spinal inflammatory hyperalgesia is mediated by prostaglandin E receptors of the EP2 subtype

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Blockade of prostaglandin (PG) production by COX inhibitors is the treatment of choice for inflammatory pain but is also prone to severe side effects. Identification of signaling elements downstream of COX inhibition, particularly of PG receptor subtypes responsible for pain sensitization (hyperalgesia), provides a strategy for better-tolerated analgesics. Here, we have identified PGE2 receptors of the EP2 receptor subtype as key signaling elements in spinal inflammatory hyperalgesia. Mice deficient in EP2 receptors (EP2–/– mice) completely lack spinal PGE2-evoked hyperalgesia. After a peripheral inflammatory stimulus, EP2–/– mice exhibit only short-lasting peripheral hyperalgesia but lack a second sustained hyperalgesic phase of spinal origin. Electrophysiological recordings identify diminished synaptic inhibition of excitatory dorsal horn neurons as the dominant source of EP2 receptor–dependent hyperalgesia. Our results thus demonstrate that inflammatory hyperalgesia can be treated by targeting of a single PG receptor subtype and provide a rational basis for new analgesic strategies going beyond COX inhibition.

Authors

Heiko Reinold, Seifollah Ahmadi, Ulrike B. Depner, Beate Layh, Cornelia Heindl, May Hamza, Andreas Pahl, Kay Brune, Shuh Narumiya, Ulrike Müller, Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer

×

Figure 4

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Paw swelling, spinal COX-2 mRNA induction, and nociceptive sensitization...
Paw swelling, spinal COX-2 mRNA induction, and nociceptive sensitization after zymosan A injection. (A) Percent increase in paw weight (mean ± SD, n = 6 each) after s.c. injection of 0.06 mg zymosan A into the left hind paw. (B) x-fold increase (mean ± SD, n = 6 each) in spinal COX-2 mRNA expression. All 3 types of mice exhibited a significant increase in COX-2 mRNA expression at 6 hours after zymosan A injection (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s post hoc test, n = 4–6 each). (C–F) Time course of thermal (C and D) and mechanical (E and F) sensitization (mean ± SD, n = 6 each) after zymosan A injection. D and F show the same data as C and E on a different time scale. Thermal sensitization in EP2–/– mice was significantly different from that in WT mice at all time points from 4 hours after zymosan A injection, and mechanical stimulation in EP2–/– mice was significantly different from that in WT mice at all time points from 6 hours after zymosan A injection. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s post hoc test).
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts