Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Aging (Upcoming)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
α1-Adrenergic receptors prevent a maladaptive cardiac response to pressure overload
Timothy D. O’Connell, … , William Grossman, Paul C. Simpson
Timothy D. O’Connell, … , William Grossman, Paul C. Simpson
Published April 3, 2006
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2006;116(4):1005-1015. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI22811.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology

α1-Adrenergic receptors prevent a maladaptive cardiac response to pressure overload

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

An α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) antagonist increased heart failure in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), but it is unknown whether this adverse result was due to α1-AR inhibition or a nonspecific drug effect. We studied cardiac pressure overload in mice with double KO of the 2 main α1-AR subtypes in the heart, α1A (Adra1a) and α1B (Adra1b). At 2 weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC), KO mouse survival was only 60% of WT, and surviving KO mice had lower ejection fractions and larger end-diastolic volumes than WT mice. Mechanistically, final heart weight and myocyte cross-sectional area were the same after TAC in KO and WT mice. However, KO hearts after TAC had increased interstitial fibrosis, increased apoptosis, and failed induction of the fetal hypertrophic genes. Before TAC, isolated KO myocytes were more susceptible to apoptosis after oxidative and β-AR stimulation, and β-ARs were desensitized. Thus, α1-AR deletion worsens dilated cardiomyopathy after pressure overload, by multiple mechanisms, indicating that α1-signaling is required for cardiac adaptation. These results suggest that the adverse cardiac effects of α1-antagonists in clinical trials are due to loss of α1-signaling in myocytes, emphasizing concern about clinical use of α1-antagonists, and point to a revised perspective on sympathetic activation in heart failure.

Authors

Timothy D. O’Connell, Philip M. Swigart, M.C. Rodrigo, Shinji Ishizaka, Shuji Joho, Lynne Turnbull, Laurence H. Tecott, Anthony J. Baker, Elyse Foster, William Grossman, Paul C. Simpson

×

Figure 1

Dilated cardiomyopathy after TAC by echocardiography.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Dilated cardiomyopathy after TAC by echocardiography.
Conscious mice wer...
Conscious mice were studied 2 weeks after TAC or sham operation. Ventricular volumes (A and B) were calculated by the cubed method (volume = 1.047 × LV internal dimension3), where LV internal dimension is defined as the distance between the LVFW and the IVS on a 2-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiogram, and ejection fraction (C) was determined by the formula (end-diastolic volume – end-systolic volume)/end-diastolic volume × 100 (85, 86). Numbers of mice are indicated.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts