Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Clinical Research and Public HealthGeneticsNeuroscience Open Access | 10.1172/JCI194555

Early brain-wide disruption of sleep microarchitecture in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Christina Lang,1,2 Simon J. Guillot,3 Dorothee Lule,1,2 Luisa T. Balz,1,2 Antje Knehr,1,2 Patrick Weydt,1,4 Johannes Dorst,1,2 Katharina Kandler,1,2 Hans-Peter Muller,1,2 Jan Kassubek,1,2 Laura Wassermann,1 Sandrine Da Cruz,5 Francesco Roselli,2 Albert C. Ludolph,1,2 Matei Bolborea,3 and Luc Dupuis3

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Lang, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Guillot, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Lule, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Balz, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Knehr, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Weydt, P. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Dorst, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Kandler, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Muller, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Kassubek, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wassermann, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Da Cruz, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Roselli, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Ludolph, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Bolborea, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

2Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Ulm, Germany.

3University of Strasbourg, INSERM, Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry STEP – CRBS, UMR-S 1329, Strasbourg, France.

4DZNE, Bonn, Germany.

5VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Dupuis, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Authorship note: CL and SJG contributed equally to this work.

Published November 6, 2025 - More info

Published in Volume 136, Issue 1 on January 2, 2026
J Clin Invest. 2026;136(1):e194555. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194555.
© 2025, Lang et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published November 6, 2025 - Version history
Received: April 14, 2025; Accepted: October 31, 2025
View PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the major adult-onset motor neuron disease, is preceded by an early period unrelated to motor symptoms, including altered sleep, with increased wakefulness and decreased deep nonrapid eye movement (NREM). Whether these alterations in sleep macroarchitecture are associated with — or even precede — abnormalities in sleep-related EEG features remains unknown.

METHODS. Here, we characterize sleep microarchitecture using polysomnography for patients with ALS (n = 33) and controls (n = 32) as well as for asymptomatic carriers of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) or C9ORF72 mutations (n = 57) and noncarrier controls (n = 30). Patients and controls with factors that could confound sleep structure, including respiratory insufficiency, were prospectively excluded. The results were complemented in 3 ALS mouse models (Sod1G86R, FusΔNLS/+, and TDP-43Q331K).

RESULTS. We observed a brain-wide reduction in the density of sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes in patients with early-stage ALS and in presymptomatic gene carriers. These defects in sleep spindles and slow oscillations correlated with cognitive performance in both cohorts, particularly with scores on memory, verbal fluency, and language function. Alterations in sleep microarchitecture were replicated in 3 mouse models, and decreases in sleep spindles were rescued following intracerebroventricular supplementation of melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) or by oral administration of a dual orexin receptor antagonist.

CONCLUSION. Sleep microarchitecture was associated with cognitive deficits and causally linked to aberrant MCH and orexin signaling in ALS.

FUNDING. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR); Fondation Thierry Latran; Association Francaise de Recherche sur la sclérose latérale amyotrophique; Association Française contre les myopathies; TargetALS; and Joint Program on Neurodegenerative Diseases Research (JPND).

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal and rapidly progressive disease affecting upper and lower motor neurons in adults, with a median survival of 3–4 years after the onset of motor symptoms. ALS usually manifests between 60 and 70 years of age (1, 2), and most patients lack a family history of the disease. However, 5%–10% of ALS cases are familial, with more than 40 distinct genes currently associated and mutations in C9ORF72, superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR-DNA-binding protein (TARDBP), and fused in sarcoma (FUS) recognized as major genetic causes of ALS (1, 2).

It is generally considered that patients with ALS do not exhibit clinical manifestations before the onset of motor symptoms. Circulating neurofilament levels, a reliable biomarker of (motor) axonal injury, increase at the time of motor symptom onset, but not 1–2 years prior to it (3, 4). Clinically, most presymptomatic gene carriers do not show even mild motor impairment within this timeframe (4, 5). However, a number of early nonmotor signs, such as weight loss (6–10) or cognitive impairment (11, 12), are known to be present in the prodromal phase, many years before the appearance of motor symptoms.

In recent research, we identified sleep alterations as a novel early nonmotor sign of ALS. We investigated sleep in 2 cohorts of patients with ALS devoid of respiratory insufficiency and in presymptomatic gene carriers. In both cohorts, we observed significant defects in sleep macroarchitecture characterized by increased wakefulness and reduced deep sleep (nonrapid eye movement 2/3 [NREM2/3]) (13). These defects were detectable at least 10–15 years before the expected onset of motor symptoms in presymptomatic gene carriers and correlated with cognitive scores (13). Similar macroarchitectural alterations were observed in mouse models of familial ALS (13).

While previous studies established sleep defects as an early phenotype in individuals at high risk of developing ALS, we now sought to explore how sleep-related EEG hallmarks are affected in ALS that could be used in regular clinical assessment. The different sleep stages are distinguished by specific graphoelements in the EEG that reflect the activation of particular cortical and subcortical pathways. These neuronal activity patterns are considered manifestations of the microarchitecture of sleep. Key EEG hallmarks include sleep spindles, bursts of 11–15 Hz (sigma frequency band) activity, typically between 0.5 and 2 seconds in duration (14, 15), as well as slow oscillations (<1.5 Hz) and K-complexes (<1 Hz), all of which are involved in NREM sleep continuity and the role of sleep in memory consolidation and cognitive function (14, 16). A disruption in the microarchitecture of sleep could be caused by specific changes in neuroanatomical pathways and thus also serve as a potential biomarker for neuronal changes or pathological conversion. Here, we analyzed sleep microarchitecture components in patients with ALS, individuals who are presymptomatic gene carriers, and mouse models (13). We observed a widespread reduction in sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes that correlated with cognitive function. We also observed similar changes in mouse models and demonstrated that they can be corrected by melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) supplementation or the administration of a dual orexin receptor antagonist. Thus, sleep microarchitecture dynamics are affected early in ALS and linked to hypothalamic dysfunction.

Results

Patients with early-stage ALS exhibit brain-wide decreased sleep spindle density. To examine the extent of alterations in sleep microarchitecture in individuals with early-stage ALS, we took advantage of polysomnography data acquired in a previous cohort study (13). The characteristics of the patients included in the study are described in Figure 1A and detailed in Table 1. We prospectively excluded patients and controls with abnormal capnographies, ensuring that the observed sleep defects were not secondary to respiratory insufficiency. Given the high prevalence of periodic limb movements in neurological diseases and the higher number of individuals with sleep-disordered breathing among patients with ALS, we determined the following exclusion criteria: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of higher than 20 and periodic limb movement index (PLMI) of higher than 50, reasoning that individuals above these thresholds would very likely display altered sleep architecture unrelated to ALS. We also did not observe REM behavior disorder or REM sleep without atonia in the patients or individuals included using established criteria (17). Furthermore, other potential factors contributing to alterations in sleep architecture, including sleep-related breathing disorders and periodic limb movements during sleep, were considered exclusion criteria. No significant differences were observed between the ALS patients and the control group with regard to age, sex or body mass index. Two patients with ALS (6%) were taking sleep-inducing medication (1 who was taking 2 mg melatonin, and 1 taking 22.5 mg mirtazapine), while no participants in the healthy control group or the presymptomatic gene carrier cohort were taking such medication.

Flowchart of the 2 cohort studies.Figure 1

Flowchart of the 2 cohort studies. (A and B) Flowchart of the studies involving patients with ALS (A, same cohort as in ref. 13) and presymptomatic gene carriers (including additional individuals as in ref. 13).

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of the study population of patients with ALS and healthy controls

Consistent with the previously observed strong defect in NREM2 and -3, we observed a pronounced decrease in sleep spindle density and their root mean square (RMS) in patients with ALS (Figure 2, A and B), while their amplitude was unchanged (Figure 2B). Topographically, we observed a significant decrease in sleep spindle density in both frontal and central electrodes (Figure 2C), while the RMS of sleep spindles was only significantly decreased in central electrodes (C3/C4) but not in frontal cortex electrodes (F3/F4) (Figure 2C). Parallel to the decreased sleep spindle density, we observed similar brain-wide reductions in slow oscillations (Figure 3, A–D) and K-complexes in individuals with early-stage ALS (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194555DS1). These results were not modified if individuals with intermediate AHI (5< AHI<20) and/or PMLSI (25<PMLSI<50) values were excluded from the analysis (Supplemental Figure 2). These observations indicate that sleep microarchitecture -s disrupted across the entire brain in patients with early-stage ALS.

Sleep spindle alterations in patients with early-stage ALS.Figure 2

Sleep spindle alterations in patients with early-stage ALS. (A) Topographic map across all electrodes of sleep spindle density in controls and patients with ALS. (B) Quantification of sleep spindle density, amplitude, and RMS. ***Padj. < 0.001 and ****Padj.< 0.0001, by independent 2-tailed Student’s t test with Welch’s t test correction. (C) Quantification of sleep spindle density, amplitude, and RMS across F3/F4 and C3/C4 electrodes. **Padj. < 0.01 and ****Padj.< 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple tests adjusted with FDR-BKY correction. Results with P > 0.05 are not indicated. Data are presented as the median and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown.

Slow oscillation alterations in patients with early-stage ALS.Figure 3

Slow oscillation alterations in patients with early-stage ALS. (A) Representative slow oscillations across all electrodes on a healthy individual and 1 patient with sALS. (B) Quantification of slow oscillation density, slope, and PAC between sleep spindles and slow oscillations (PAC) and phase at sigma peak (PSP) in controls and patients with ALS. **Padj. < 0.01 and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by independent 2-tailed Student’s t test with Welch’s t test correction. (C) Topographic maps across all electrodes of slow oscillation density, slope, PAC, and PSP in controls and patients with ALS. (D) Quantification of slow oscillation density, slope, PAC, and PSP across F3/F4 and C3/C4 electrodes as indicated. *Padj. < 0.05, ***Padj. < 0.001, and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple tests adjusted with FDR-BKY correction. Results with P > 0.05 are not indicated. Data are presented as medians and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown.

Presymptomatic ALS gene carriers show decreased sleep spindle density. To further characterize the changes in the microarchitecture of sleep and to assess their onset during the course of the disease, a second prospective cohort study was conducted comprising presymptomatic ALS gene carriers, using identical inclusion and exclusion criteria (Figure 1B). This cohort corresponds to the cohort previously described (13), with an additional 29 gene carriers and 11 first-degree relatives of patients with familial ALS (fALS) with negative genetic reports. A total of 57 presymptomatic gene carriers (SOD1 n = 13; C9ORF72 n = 33; remaining individuals: other mutations) and a total of 30 first-degree relatives without mutations were included in the analysis (Table 2). Here again, we did not identify patients or individuals with the REM behavior disorder that has been observed in prodromal neurodegenerative diseases. In the analysis, we focused on the 2 groups of SOD1 gene carriers and C9ORF72 gene carriers. The other mutation carriers were not analyzed because of the small sample size and heterogeneity.

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of the fALS study population

Similarly to patients with ALS, presymptomatic SOD1 and C9ORF72 ALS gene carriers showed comparable reductions in sleep spindle density and RMS (Figure 4, A and B), with unchanged mean brain-wide amplitude (Figure 4B). The density and RMS of sleep spindles were decreased in both SOD1 and C9ORF72 gene carriers in both frontal and central electrodes (Figure 4C). Interestingly, SOD1, but not C9ORF72, gene carriers also displayed a mildly decreased amplitude of sleep spindle density in the frontal and central areas (Figure 4C). A brain-wide reduction in slow oscillations (Figure 5) and K-complexes (Supplemental Figure 3) was observed in presymptomatic gene carriers, similar to that observed in patients with ALS. As in patients with ALS, these results were not modified if individuals with intermediate AHI (5<AHI<20) and/or PMLSI (25<PMLSI<50) values were excluded from the analysis (Supplemental Figure 4). Thus, sleep microarchitecture was significantly affected in ALS gene carriers who did not yet show any signs of manifest disease.

Sleep spindle alterations in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers.Figure 4

Sleep spindle alterations in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers. (A) Topographic map across all electrodes of sleep spindle density in controls and SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers. (B) Quantification of sleep spindle density, amplitude, and RMS in controls and SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers. **Padj. < 0.01, ***Padj. < 0.001, and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA with FDR-BKY correction. (C) Quantification of sleep spindle density, amplitude, and RMS in controls and SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers across F3/F4 and C3/C4 electrodes as indicated. *Padj. < 0.05, ***Padj. < 0.001, and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple tests adjusted with FDR-BKY correction. Results with P > 0.05 are not indicated. Data are presented as medians and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown.

Slow oscillation alterations in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers.Figure 5

Slow oscillation alterations in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers. (A) Representative slow oscillations across all electrodes for a healthy individual, 1 presymptomatic SOD1, and 1 C9ORF72 gene carrier. (B) Quantification of slow oscillation density, slope, PAC between sleep spindles and slow oscillations, and PSP in controls and SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers. *Padj. < 0.05, **Padj. < 0.01, and ****Padj. < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA with FDR-BKY correction. (C) Topographic maps across all electrodes of slow oscillation density, slope, PAC, and PSP in controls and SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers. (D) Quantification of slow oscillation density, slope, PAC, and PSP across F3/F4 and C3/C4 electrodes in controls, SOD1 and C9ORF72 presymptomatic gene carriers as indicated. *Padj. < 0.05, ***Padj. < 0.001, and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple tests adjusted with FDR-BKY correction. Results with P > 0.05 are not indicated. Data are presented as the median and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown.

Microarchitectural alterations of sleep patterns correlate with cognitive deficits. Previous research demonstrated a correlation between modifications in the microarchitecture of sleep and the presence of cognitive deficits (14, 16). Furthermore, there is a link between sleep spindles and motor memory consolidation (18). To determine whether this association could also be observed in our 2 cohorts, we correlated sleep microarchitecture parameters with cognitive function in patients with ALS and presymptomatic gene carriers, as well as with motor function in patients with ALS. We evaluated cognitive function using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS) and motor function with the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALS-FRSr). In patients with ALS, cognitive testing was conducted 1–7 days after polysomnography in 58.5% of participants. the day before polysomnography, 13.2% of the participants underwent the ECAS test, and 26.4% were tested the following day. In the presymptomatic gene carrier cohort, the ECAS test was always administered in the morning after polysomnography. ALS-FRSr was recorded between 4 days before and 7 days after the sleep study.

In patients with ALS, we observed a significant positive correlation after adjustment for multiple comparisons between total ECAS scores and either sleep spindle density or slow oscillation density (Figure 6, A–C). We also observed significant correlations between densities of sleep spindles or slow oscillation and various ECAS subscores (Figure 6A, Supplemental Figures 5 and 6, and Supplemental Table 1) including memory, language function, and verbal fluency subscores but not the ALS-FRSr score or its slope (Figure 6A and Supplemental Figures 5 and 6). In these patients, the correlations between cognitive assessment scores and K-complexes were noticeably weaker (Figure 6A and Supplemental Figure 7). In presymptomatic gene carriers, the densities of sleep spindles or slow oscillation correlated also with total ECAS scores (Figure 6, D–F, and Supplemental Table 2) as well as several ECAS subscores (Figure 6, D–F, and Supplemental Figures 8 and 9), while there were no correlations with K-complexes (Supplemental Figure 10). Thus, the present findings indicate that alterations in the sleep microarchitecture were associated with cognitive performance, particularly in relation to verbal fluency, language function and memory.

Correlation analysis between sleep microarchitecture, cognitive function, aFigure 6

Correlation analysis between sleep microarchitecture, cognitive function, and motor function in patients with ALS and presymptomatic gene carriers. (A) Correlation matrix showing Spearman’s correlation coefficient r for each of the corresponding correlations performed for patients with ALS. Sleep spindle density, slow oscillation density, and K-complex density were correlated with ALS-FRSr, ALS-FRS slope, patient survival, and ECAS subscores as well as the total score for all patients with ALS. Only significant correlations are indicated with the numerical value of Spearman’s r. (B and C) Correlation between total ECAS scores and sleep spindle density (B) or slow oscillations density (C) for patients with ALS. (D) Correlation matrix showing Spearman’s correlation coefficient r for each of the corresponding correlations performed for presymptomatic gene carriers. Sleep spindle density, slow oscillation density, and K-complex density were correlated with ECAS subscores as well as the total score for all SOD1 and C9ORF72 gene carriers. Only significant correlations are indicated with the numerical value of Spearman’s r. (E and F) Correlation between total ECAS scores and sleep spindle density (B) or slow oscillation density (C) in presymptomatic gene carriers. Spearman’s P value was adjusted with FDR-BKY correction. Spearman’s correlation coefficient r and corrected P value are indicated. Side distribution represents sex distribution across both variables.

Three ALS models exhibit microarchitectural alterations of sleep patterns. Given the presence of sleep microarchitecture alterations in both patients with early-stage ALS and presymptomatic gene carriers, we sought to investigate whether these microarchitectural alterations are mirrored by findings in transgenic ALS mouse models. We studied 3 mouse models expressing distinct ALS-causing mutations, each with markedly disparate disease progression and different genetic backgrounds. The transgenic model Sod1G86R (on a FVB/N genetic background) is associated with severe and rapidly progressive motor symptoms (19, 20), whereas the FusΔNLS/+ (21, 22) and TDP-43Q331K models (on a C57BL/6 background) (23) are linked to a light-to-mild and late-onset phenotype (13). We used datasets previously acquired (13) from mouse cohorts implanted with intracortical electrodes, focusing on recordings taken during the presymptomatic phase. In parallel to our findings in patients with ALS and gene carriers, all 3 mouse models demonstrated substantial alterations in sleep spindles (Figure 7, A–E, and Supplemental Figure 11). It is noteworthy that there was a significant decrease in sleep spindle density in 3-month-old FusΔNLS/+ mice (Figure 7C), despite showing no detectable alterations in sleep macroarchitecture at this stage (13). As in ALS patients and presymptomatic gene carriers, decreased sleep spindle density in all 3 mouse models was also accompanied by decreased densities in both slow oscillations (Figure 7, F–I) and K-complexes (Supplemental Figure 12). In all 3 models, we consistently observed microarchitectural alterations in both male and female mice. Thus, early changes in sleep microarchitecture were present in multiple ALS mouse models, mirroring the alterations observed in patients with early-stage ALS and presymptomatic gene carriers.

Sleep microarchitecture alterations in Sod1G86R, FusΔNLS/+, and TDP-43Q331KFigure 7

Sleep microarchitecture alterations in Sod1G86R, FusΔNLS/+, and TDP-43Q331K mice. (A) Representative spectrogram of Sod1G86R mice and their nontransgenic WT littermates at 75 days of age (prior to motor symptom onset). Sleep spindles are labeled in blue and slow oscillations in red on the spectrogram. (B–I) Quantification of sleep spindle density (B–E) and slow oscillation density (F–I) for Sod1G86R mice and their nontransgenic WT littermates at 75 days of age (B and F); for FusΔNLS/+ mice and their WT littermates (Fus+/+) at 3 months of age (C and G, prior to motor symptom onset) or at 10 months of age (D and H); and for TDP-43Q331K mice at 10 months of age (E and I). **Padj. < 0.01 and ****Padj. < 0.0001, by independent 2-tailed Student’s t test with Welch’s t test with FRD-BKY correction. Data are presented as medians and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown. Sleep spindle density: sex effect Sod1G86R Padj. = 0.0238, FusΔNLS/+ 3 months Padj. = 0.0183, FusΔNLS/+ 10 months Padj. = 0.0455, TDP-43Q331K 10 months Padj. = 0.0863. Slow oscillation density: Sex effect Sod1G86R Padj. =0.7128, FusΔNLS/+ 3 months Padj. = 0.2740, FusΔNLS/+ 10 months Padj. = 0.8112, TDP-43Q331K 10 months Padj. = 0.3648.

Sleep spindle defects are rescued by an orexin antagonist. We previously showed that sleep alterations in ALS mouse models can be fully rescued through administration of suvorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist. We reanalyzed the previous datasets from studies in which suvorexant or its vehicle was administered orally to mice at the onset of the inactive period (i.e., during the day in mice). Single administration of suvorexant increased sleep spindle density in all 3 mouse models to near-WT levels, with a more pronounced effect in females, whereas efficacy was diminished in aged 10-month-old mice (Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 13). We observed similar restorative effects for slow oscillations and K-complexes (Supplemental Figure 14). MCH supplementation had similar, yet blunted, effects on all sleep microarchitecture events in both Sod1G86R mice (Supplemental Figure 15) and FusΔNLS/+ mice (Supplemental Figure 16). In all, our results suggest that increased orexinergic tone is causally related to sleep microarchitectural defects in both ALS mouse models and patients.

Improved sleep microarchitecture by suvorexant-treated Sod1G86R, FusΔNLS/+,Figure 8

Improved sleep microarchitecture by suvorexant-treated Sod1G86R, FusΔNLS/+, and TDP-43Q331K mice. (A) Representative spectrogram of Sod1G86R mice and their nontransgenic WT littermates at 75 days of age (prior to motor symptom onset) administered either vehicle or suvorexant. Sleep spindles are labeled in blue and slow oscillations in red on the spectrogram. (B–E) Quantification of sleep spindle density in mice treated with either vehicle or suvorexant. The genotypes studied include Sod1G86R mice and their nontransgenic WT littermates at 75 days of age (B); in FusΔNLS/+ mice and their WT littermates (Fus+/+) at 3 months of age (C, prior to motor symptom onset) or at 10 months of age (D); and in TDP-43Q331K mice at 10 months of age (E). NS Padj. > 0.05, by 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s test and FDR-BKY correction. Genotype effect (not indicated on figure) Sod1G86R Padj. < 0.0001 FusΔNLS/+ 3 months Padj. < 0.0001, FusΔNLS/+ 10 months Padj. < 0.0001, TDP-43Q331K 10 months Padj. < 0.0001; sex effect Sod1G86R Padj. < 0.0001, FusΔNLS/+ 3 months Padj. = 0.4584, FusΔNLS/+ 10 months Padj. = 0.3032, TDP-43Q331K 10 months Padj. = 0.1522. Data are presented as medians and IQRs. Corrected P values are shown. *Padj. < 0.05, **Padj. < 0.01, and ****Padj. < 0.0001.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that the disruption of sleep microarchitecture in ALS was profound and brain wide and preceded the onset of motor symptoms in both humans and mouse models.

Alterations in sleep microarchitecture in ALS affect multiple sleep-related EEG features, including sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes. In ALS patients without respiratory impairment, as well as in presymptomatic ALS gene carriers, we observed reduced densities for all 3 EEG signals compared with their respective controls. The decrease in density was brain wide, and we did not observe disruption patterns confined to isolated central or frontal regions. We also observed similar alterations in sleep microarchitecture in 3 mouse models of ALS. These defects in microarchitecture were more pronounced and appeared earlier in mouse models than macroarchitectural abnormalities (13). Indeed, while we previously did not observe increased wakefulness or decreased NREM in 3-month-old FusΔNLS/+ mice, there was a loss of sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes at this age. These findings need to be confirmed in patients with FUS mutations but could be used as some of the earliest detectable changes in ALS pathophysiology, as they precede other symptomatic and sleep macroarchitecture alterations observed in that particular mutation.

Disruption of sleep EEG features, as we describe here in ALS, is widely observed in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases. Loss of sleep spindles, particularly spindle density, and loss of slow oscillations have been consistently observed in Alzheimer’s disease (24–26) and Parkinson’s disease (27–29) and in other neurological diseases such as temporal lobe epilepsy (30) and schizophrenia (31–33). Remarkably, this was not observed in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or in most patients with autism spectrum disorder (31). Sleep spindle density also decreases with age (34), suggesting that accelerated brain aging could account for some of our results in patients with ALS, both in terms of microarchitectural defects (the current study) or macroarchitectural changes (13). Furthermore, as decreased sleep spindle density is observed in several neurological and neurodegenerative conditions, the current observation is unlikely to be used as diagnostic. Nevertheless, sleep spindles and slow oscillations are quantifiable parameters, and their disruption appears early, in the prodromal stage of the disease. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that sleep EEGs may contain hallmarks that could be explored for prognostic purposes.

There are 2 limitations of our current description of sleep microarchitectural defects. First, we present evidence of presymptomatic defects only in fALS, in both presymptomatic gene carriers and mouse models. We do not have access to prediagnostic polysomnography in sporadic ALS (sALS) and can only assume that our observation in fALS extends to sALS. Second, our current study is cross-sectional and lacks longitudinal follow-up. Consequently, we are currently unable to determine whether these phenotypes worsen as symptom onset approaches or as the disease progresses. Future studies should include longitudinal polysomnography in presymptomatic gene carriers to determine the dynamics of sleep macro- and microarchitecture and their possible role as prognostic markers of phenoconversion.

What might be the consequences of defects in sleep microarchitecture? It has been documented that sleep spindles and slow oscillations are causally involved in memory consolidation and executive functions (14, 16). In patients with Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease, the severity of sleep spindle disruption has been linked to memory and cognitive impairments (24–29). Complementing these findings, we observed strong correlations between cognitive scores and sleep spindles and slow oscillations in our 2 cohorts. These correlations were stronger than previously reported associations between sleep stages and cognitive function in the same cohorts (13). Whether loss of sleep spindles affects motor progression in ALS remains unknown. Notably, sleep spindles are highly associated with motor adaptation (35) and motor memory consolidation (18, 36–39), and disruption of this functional balance could potentially accelerate or exacerbate motor decline. Longitudinal studies in patients and gene carriers, as well as experimental rodent studies, may help address this question.

Defects in sleep microarchitecture may arise from multiple causes, which our study does not definitively distinguish. First, defects in intracortical circuits could impair slow oscillations, sleep spindles, and K-complexes, as these EEG patterns originate and propagate locally within cortical networks, particularly the frontal part (40–45). In this context, impaired frontal lobe function in ALS (46, 47) may contribute to the abnormalities observed. Second, these defects could result from dysfunction in subcortical structures such as the thalamus. Sleep spindles originate in the thalamus (14, 16), which also plays a key role in modulating the timing, coherence, and spindle nesting of slow oscillations (48, 49). Thalamic atrophy has been documented in ALS, particularly in patients carrying the C9ORF72 gene (50–55), and alterations of the thalamo-cortical pathway have been observed in both patients with sALS (56, 57) and presymptomatic C9ORF72 gene carriers (58). These thalamic alterations have been linked to faster progression in sALS (59) and a higher risk of phenoconversion in C9ORF72 ALS (60). Thalamic involvement is considered an early biomarker of ALS, contributing to both motor and cognitive deficits in sporadic cases (61–64), and is described as an early event, i.e., stage 2 in the Braak staging system of TDP-43 pathology spread (65, 66). Third, impairments in monoaminergic pathways, particularly acetylcholine (67–70) or norepinephrine (71–73) pathways, could be the origin of sleep microarchitecture alterations. This would align with previous observations of acetylcholine defects (70) or norepinephrine dysfunction (74) in ALS. Finally, part of the observed microarchitectural changes may be caused by hypothalamic defects, such as orexin or MCH signaling alterations. Our results show that orexin antagonism or MCH supplementation can rescue the loss of sleep spindles and slow oscillations in several ALS mouse models, strongly implicating the hypothalamus. This aligns with reported MCH neuron loss in ALS postmortem tissues (75) and several studies indicating orexin pathway alterations in patients with ALS and mouse models (13, 76, 77). These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, as thalamic reticular nucleus neurons are sensitive to orexin (78, 79) and are also highly modulated by cholinergic or noradrenergic innervation during sleep (72, 80–82). Our findings do not establish a direct causal relationship between MCH/orexin signaling and microarchitecture sleep defects. It remains possible that sleep dysfunctions originate in other brain regions such as the cortex, locus coeruleus, or thalamus and are corrected by MCH or suvorexant. Elucidating the mechanisms behind sleep microarchitecture defects will require further experimental investigation.

In summary, our study identifies alterations in sleep EEGs as an early biomarker of ALS that is detectable many years before symptom onset in presymptomatic gene carriers and correlates with cognitive decline. Uncovering the underlying mechanisms may offer critical insights into the earliest pathophysiological events in ALS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether sleep microarchitectural alterations can serve as prognostic markers for phenoconversion and disease progression, especially given the easy testing set-up in clinical practice. Preclinical evaluation of chronic administration of dual orexin receptor antagonists is now required to determine their safety in ALS models and their potential translational relevance for improving sleep, mitigating cognitive deficits, preventing weight loss, and slowing motor symptom progression, and will likely justify future human clinical trials.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Our study involved both male and female individuals, for both the human studies and experimental mouse models. Sex is indicated in each figure and was considered a biological variable for statistical analysis. The effect of sex is reported in the figure legends.

Patients and participants. Patients with ALS were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient clinics of the Neurology Department of the University Hospital of Ulm (Ulm, Germany). The inclusion criteria for patients with ALS included a definitive diagnosis of ALS based on the revised El Escorial criteria (83). Presymptomatic carriers of fALS genes were recruited through the study center of the University Neurology Clinic, which provides longitudinal follow-up and counseling to first-degree relatives of patients with confirmed fALS. Controls were recruited from the general population of the Neurology Clinic and were matched to patients with ALS on the basis of age, sex, and geographical location; the requirement for inclusion in this group was the absence of neurodegenerative diseases. All individuals in the control group had no history of ALS or fALS.

The participants’ medical history was documented. For patients with ALS, the ALS-FRSr and characteristics of disease progression were documented (site of first paresis/atrophy, date of onset). All participants also completed validated daytime sleepiness and sleep quality questionnaires, namely the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) (84) and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) (85). Current medication for all participants were documented, and no exclusion criteria related to medication use were applied that would have prevented participation.

Patients’ inclusion process. The same exclusion criteria used by Guillot et al. (13) were applied and are summarized in Figure 1. Participation in the study was possible in this cohort for both patients with sALS and those with fALS. Exclusion criteria were designed to exclude all possible circumstances that might otherwise alter sleep architecture. For this reason, participants who had an AHI higher than 20 per hour, or participants who had a periodic limb movement index (PLMSI) above 50 per hour were excluded. In particular, we intended to exclude respiratory insufficiency in patients with ALS. Respiratory insufficiency develops earlier or later in the progression of ALS, depending on the individual course, but is generally present in advanced stages and is known to influence sleep architecture (86). For this reason, patients with ALS underwent transcutaneous capnometry in addition to polysomnography. Capnometry results had to be normal, or nocturnal hypercapnia would result in exclusion from the study.

Inclusion process of first-degree relatives of patients with fALS. The same exclusion criteria applied by Guillot et al. (13) were followed. We enrolled first-degree relatives of patients with fALS for whom the ALS-causing mutation was known. The participants were examined according to the study protocol, and genotyping was also performed. Neither the participants nor the study personnel were informed of the genetic results at the time of the examinations. After the study visits, participants were assigned to the group of presymptomatic gene carriers or the control group with negative genetic findings based on their genetic results. The participants could only learn the result of the genetic test if they had completed the legally required genetic counseling appointments (in accordance with the German Genetic Diagnostics Act).

Neuropsychological assessment. Trained neuropsychologists measured cognition with the German version of the ECAS (87–89). The ECAS addresses the cognitive domains of language function, verbal fluency, executive functions (ALS-specific functions), and memory and visuospatial functions (ALS-nonspecific functions). Age- and education-adjusted cut-offs were used (89). Behavioral changes were assessed by patient caregiver/first-degree relative interviews on disinhibition, apathy, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative/stereotyped behavior, hyperorality/altered eating behavior, and psychotic symptoms. Since the participants in the ALS patient cohort were hospitalized, the neuropsychological examination was conducted in the days before or after the polysomnography, with a maximum interval of 1 week. The participants of the presymptomatic gene carrier cohort underwent the neuropsychological examination the morning after the polysomnography.

Electroencephalography in patients and controls. All participants — patients with ALS, healthy individuals, presymptomatic fALS gene carriers, and fALS control individuals — underwent a 1-night full polysomnography, which was performed at the inpatient sleep laboratory of the Department of Neurology at Ulm University Hospital and involved monitoring of various physiological parameters including EEG, surface electromyogram (EMG), electrooculogram (EOG), respiratory effort and flow, pulse, and oxygen saturation. To minimize bias, conditions were standardized within each cohort: presymptomatic gene carriers followed a protocol with arrival in the morning, polysomnography at night, and neuropsychology the next day, and ALS patients along with their controls underwent polysomnography during a single night of a multi-day inpatient stay. All measurements were conducted according to the criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines (90, 91). The EEG electrodes were placed according to the international 10–20 system. The following electrodes were used for each participant: Fz, C3, C4, Cz, P3, P4, Pz, O1, O2, M1, and M2. The sampling rate was 512 Hz in each case. The EEG montage was in accordance with the general recommendation of the AASM guidelines, with contralateral referencing to the mastoid electrode, i.e., F3–M2, C3–M2, O1–M2, and F4–M1, C4–M1, O2–M1. A “lights-off” marker was placed in each recording to indicate the individual point in time when the participant turned off the lights and attempted to sleep. In order to accommodate sleep times as closely as possible to the chronotype, participants were allowed to freely choose the start time of the examination, but the latest time was midnight. The occurrence of a REM sleep behavior disorder was evaluated in all individuals using previously defined criteria (17).

Sleep analyses in patients and controls. Analyses were performed using available Python packages (only compatible with Python 3.10 or newer, Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, version 3.12. http://www.python.org), relying on the MNE package (92). EEG preprocessing was performed following the guidelines of Guillot SJ et al. (13).

Briefly, recordings were first deidentified using the open-source Prerau Lab EDF Deidentification Tool (version 1.0; 2023) in Python (Prerau Lab EDF Deidentification Tool retrieved from https://sleepeeg.org/edf-de-identification-tool) and were then notch filtered to remove the 50 Hz powerline. Independent component analysis was performed to remove all remaining artifacts from the signal (93–97).

Analyses of sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes were performed on all electrodes (41, 98, 99), and outliers were removed using an isolation forest algorithm (100). K-complex analysis was limited to the sensorimotor cortex (C3), which is known to be impaired in ALS, using MNE and SciPy packages (100, 101). For the sleep spindles, their density (number of sleep spindles per minute of NREM2/3 sleep), amplitude (peak-to-peak amplitude of the detrended sleep spindle), and RMS were measured, with the frequency bands set to 12–15 Hz and required to last 0.5–2 seconds. For slow oscillations, their density (number of slow oscillations per minute of NREM2/3), slope (slope between the negative peak and the midpoint of the slow oscillation), phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) (slow oscillations sleep spindle–normalized PAC within a 2-second epoch centered around the negative peak of the slow oscillation), and phase at sigma peak (phase of the slow oscillation when the sigma peak is reached within a 2-second epoch centered around the negative peak of the slow oscillation) were analyzed, with the frequency bands set to 0.3–1.5 Hz and amplitude below 150 μV. For the K-complex assessment, we analyzed the density (number of K-complexes per minute of NREM2), with the frequency bands set to 0.3–1 Hz and amplitude between 100 and 350 μV. Topographic maps were generated using the MNE and YASA packages (101). All analyses were performed following the AASM’s guidelines (102).

Electrocorticography analysis in mice. Data were extracted from the NeuroScore software for sleep and seizure analysis 3.4 (Data Science International) and used in combination with already available Python packages (Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, version 3.12. http://www.python.org) to further process the data.

Sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and K-complexes were automatically detected using publicly available pipelines (103, 104). The signal was first band-pass filtered at 1–45 Hz, and the sigma power (12–16 Hz) was calculated on a 200 ms Hamming window followed by a short-term Fourier transform (STFT) with the same window length. The occurrence of sleep spindles was identified when the smoothed absolute sigma power within the 12–16 Hz range exceeded 0.2 of the total power observed in the broadband frequency range of 0.1–45 Hz. This signifies that at least 20% of the total signal power must be within the specified sigma band.

Equation 1

aFor slow oscillations, the signal was first band-pass filtered at 0.1–45 Hz, and the low delta power (0.1–2 Hz) was calculated on a 400 ms Hamming window. AUCs were calculated using Simpson’s rule derived from the delta band (Aso) and the total power broadband frequency range (BPSD). The ratio of these 2 AUCs was then obtained, providing the slow oscillations ratio.

Equation 2

For K-complexes, the signal was first band-pass filtered at 0.1–45 Hz, and the sigma power was calculated on a 400 ms Hamming window. The signal was first band-pass filtered at 1–45 Hz, and the low delta power (0.3–1 Hz) was calculated on a 200 ms Hamming window followed by an STFT with the same window length. The occurrence of K-complexes was identified when the STFT within the 0.3–1 Hz range exceeded the mean STFT of the same frequency range.

Equation 3

Statistics. G*Power software (version 3.1.9.6 for macOS; 2023) was used to determine the sufficient sample size needed to achieve significant statistical power using an a priori 2-tailed Student’s t test coupled with a linear bivariate regression (105, 106).

Prior to any statistical analysis, normality and homoscedasticity were both tested respectively with a Shapiro-Wilk test (107) and Bartlett’s test (108).

For comparisons between 2 groups, an independent 2-tailed Student’s t test was performed using Pingouin (109), with Welch’s t test correction, from SciPy, as recommended by Zimmerman (110). A large Cauchy scale factor was incorporated, given the considered effect size (111). When data violated normality or heteroscedastic a Mann-Whitney U test was performed using SciPy (100).

Follow-up analyses were performed using a paired t test from SciPy (100) or a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test from statsmodels (112) when normality was not met. P values were then adjusted using FDR–Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli (FDR-BKY) correction.

For comparisons among 3 or 4 groups, a 1- or 2-way ANOVA was performed using the Pingouin (109) toolbox. For both ANOVA models, a multiple-comparison test with FDR-BKY correction was applied. If normality or heteroscedastic assumptions were not met, a Kruskal-Wallis test from SciPy (100) followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test with FDR-BKY correction was performed using scikit–post hocs (113) instead of a 1-way ANOVA. For the 2-way ANOVA, a generalized least-squares model was fitted using statsmodels (112), followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test and FDR-BKY correction using scikit–post hocs (113). We evaluated whether a sex-specific effect was present in all our analyses by performing a 2-way ANOVA followed by a multiple-comparison test with FDR-BKY correction for both sexes. Sex was self-reported in both ALS cohorts.

Spearman’s correlation coefficient from SciPy (100), was used for correlations in nonparametric data.

Data are presented as violin plots with all points and expressed as the median ± IQR. Visualizations were generated using Seaborn and Matplotlib packages (114). Results were deemed significant when the adjusted (adj.) P value was less than 0.05. Here, only corrected P values (adj. P values) are shown.

Study approval. The study involving the ALS patient cohort was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Ulm (reference 391/18). The study in presymptomatic carriers received approval by the same ethics committee of the University of Ulm (reference 68/19), in accordance with the ethics standards of the current version of the revised Helsinki Declaration. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Mouse experiments were performed in full compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU and new Regulation (EU) 2019/1010, and the project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Strasbourg and the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation (decree no. 2013-118, February 1, 2013). All procedures including animal care and surgery and the datasets used in this study have been previously described (13).

Data availability. Additional data are available upon request to the corresponding authors. All numerical data are provided in the Supporting Data Values file.

Author contributions

CL, SJG, ACL, MB and LD conceptualized the study. CL, SJG, DL, LTB, AK, PW, JD, KK, HPM, JK, LW, MB performed the experiments. CL, SJG, ACL, MB, LD analyzed the results. CL, SJG, LD generated visualization of the results. SJG, SDC, ACL, MB, LD provided resources. ACL, FR, LD acquired funding. AK, PW, JD, FR, ACL, MB, LD were involved in project administration. ACL, MB, LD supervised the project. CL, SJG, MB, LD wrote the original draft of the manuscript, and all authors reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript.

Funding support
  • Fondation Anne-Marie et Roger Dreyfus (hosted by Fondation de France) (to SJG).
  • Charcot Stiftung (to CL).
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-24-CE37-4064).
  • Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute NeuroStra (as part of the ITI 2021-2028, Idex Unistra ANR-10-IDEX-0002, ANR-20-SFRI-0012).
  • Fondation Thierry Latran.
  • Association Francaise de Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique, Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM-Téléthon, no. 28944).
  • TargetALS and JPND (HiCALS project).
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View ICMJE disclosure forms

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and their families, as well as the volunteers for their participation in these studies. The authors are grateful to the Animal Facility Core (PEFRE, University of Strasbourg, INSERM, UMS 38).

Address correspondence to: Albert C. Ludolph, RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Email: albert.ludolph@uni-ulm.de (ACL). Or to: Matei Bolborea or Luc Dupuis, Centre de Recherches en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, 1 rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France. mbolborea@unistra.fr (MB). ldupuis@unistra.fr (LP).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2025, Lang et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2026;136(1):e194555. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194555.

References
  1. Goutman SA, et al. Emerging insights into the complex genetics and pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(5):465–479.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Goutman SA, et al. Recent advances in the diagnosis and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(5):480–493.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Weydt P, et al. Neurofilament levels as biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):152–158.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Benatar M, et al. Mild motor impairment as prodromal state in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a new diagnostic entity. Brain. 2022;145(10):3500–3508.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Benatar M, et al. The Miami Framework for ALS and related neurodegenerative disorders: an integrated view of phenotype and biology. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(6):364–376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Diekmann K, et al. Impact of comorbidities and co-medication on disease onset and progression in a large German ALS patient group. J Neurol. 2020;267(7):2130–2141.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Janse van Mantgem MR, et al. Prognostic value of weight loss in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(8):867–875.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Wei QQ, et al. Early weight instability is associated with cognitive decline and poor survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res Bull. 2021;171:10–15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Li JY, et al. Correlation of weight and body composition with disease progression rate in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13292.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Peter RS, et al. Life course body mass index and risk and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: results from the ALS registry Swabia. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(10):901–908.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Abrahams S. Neuropsychological impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19(11):655–667.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Lule DE, et al. Deficits in verbal fluency in presymptomatic C9orf72 mutation gene carriers-a developmental disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(11):1195–1200.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Guillot SJ, et al. Early-onset sleep alterations found in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are ameliorated by orexin antagonist in mouse models. Sci Transl Med. 2025;17(783):eadm7580.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez LMJ, Luthi A. Sleep Spindles: Mechanisms and Functions. Physiol Rev. 2020;100(2):805–868.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Purcell SM, et al. Characterizing sleep spindles in 11,630 individuals from the National Sleep Research Resource. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15930.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Brodt S, et al. Sleep-A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation. Neuron. 2023;111(7):1050–1075.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Mayer G, et al. Quantification of tonic and phasic muscle activity in REM sleep behavior disorder. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;25(1):48–55.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Baena D, et al. Motor learning promotes regionally-specific spindle-slow wave coupled cerebral memory reactivation. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1492.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Dupuis L, et al. Differential screening of mutated SOD1 transgenic mice reveals early up-regulation of a fast axonal transport component in spinal cord motor neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2000;7(4):274–285.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Dupuis L, et al. Evidence for defective energy homeostasis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: benefit of a high-energy diet in a transgenic mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(30):11159–11164.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Scekic-Zahirovic J, et al. Toxic gain of function from mutant FUS protein is crucial to trigger cell autonomous motor neuron loss. EMBO J. 2016;35(10):1077–1097.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Scekic-Zahirovic J, et al. Motor neuron intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of FUS-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(6):887–906.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Arnold ES, et al. ALS-linked TDP-43 mutations produce aberrant RNA splicing and adult-onset motor neuron disease without aggregation or loss of nuclear TDP-43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(8):736–745.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Zhang Y, et al. Sleep in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of polysomnographic findings. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):136.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. D’Rozario AL, et al. Objective measurement of sleep in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;52:101308.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Weng YY, et al. Sleep spindle abnormalities related to Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic mini-review. Sleep Med. 2020;75:37–44.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Villamar-Flores CI, et al. Association between alterations in sleep spindles and cognitive decline in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2024;842:138006.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Latreille V, et al. Electroencephalographic prodromal markers of dementia across conscious states in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2016;139(pt 4):1189–1199.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Christensen JA, et al. Sleep spindle alterations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:233.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Bender AC, et al. Altered sleep microarchitecture and cognitive impairment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2023;101(23):2376–2387.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Mayeli A, et al. Recent evidence of non-rapid eye movement sleep oscillation abnormalities in psychiatric disorders. [published online October 14, 2024]. Curr Psychiatry Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01544-x.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Denis D, et al. Sleep oscillations and their relations with sleep-dependent memory consolidation in early course psychosis and first-degree relatives. Schizophr Res. 2024;274:473–485.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Ferrarelli F. Sleep spindles as neurophysiological biomarkers of schizophrenia. Eur J Neurosci. 2024;59(8):1907–1917.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Peters KR, et al. Age differences in the variability and distribution of sleep spindle and rapid eye movement densities. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91047.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Ameen MS, et al. Post-training sleep modulates motor adaptation and task-related beta oscillations. J Sleep Res. 2024;33(4):e14082.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Hahn MA, et al. Slow oscillation-spindle coupling strength predicts real-life gross-motor learning in adolescents and adults. Elife. 2022;11:e66761.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Boutin A, Doyon J. A sleep spindle framework for motor memory consolidation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020;375(1799):20190232.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Kam K, et al. Dynamics of sleep spindles and coupling to slow oscillations following motor learning in adult mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019;166:107100.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Laventure S, et al. NREM2 and sleep spindles are instrumental to the consolidation of motor sequence memories. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(3):e1002429.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Covelo J, et al. Spatiotemporal network dynamics and structural correlates in the human cerebral cortex in vitro. Prog Neurobiol. 2025;246:102719.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Massimini M, et al. The sleep slow oscillation as a traveling wave. J Neurosci. 2004;24(31):6862–6870.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Nir Y, et al. Regional slow waves and spindles in human sleep. Neuron. 2011;70(1):153–169.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Girardeau G, Lopes-Dos-Santos V. Brain neural patterns and the memory function of sleep. Science. 2021;374(6567):560–564.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Amzica F, Steriade M. The K-complex: its slow (<1-Hz) rhythmicity and relation to delta waves. Neurology. 1997;49(4):952–959.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Halasz P. The K-complex as a special reactive sleep slow wave - A theoretical update. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;29:34–40.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Mohammadi B, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis affects cortical and subcortical activity underlying motor inhibition and action monitoring. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(8):2878–2889.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Metzger M, et al. Distinct longitudinal changes in EEG measures reflecting functional network disruption in ALS cognitive phenotypes. Brain Topogr. 2024;38(1):3.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Crunelli V, et al. The thalamocortical network as a single slow wave-generating unit. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;31:72–80.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Neske GT. The slow oscillation in cortical and thalamic networks: mechanisms and functions. Front Neural Circuits. 2015;9:88.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  50. Wiesenfarth M, et al. Structural and microstructural neuroimaging signature of C9orf72-associated ALS: A multiparametric MRI study. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;39:103505.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Nigri A, et al. C9orf72 ALS mutation carriers show extensive cortical and subcortical damage compared to matched wild-type ALS patients. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;38:103400.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Bonham LW, et al. Radiogenomics of C9orf72 expansion carriers reveals global transposable element derepression and enables prediction of thalamic atrophy and clinical impairment. J Neurosci. 2023;43(2):333–345.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Chipika RH, et al. MRI data confirm the selective involvement of thalamic and amygdalar nuclei in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. Data Brief. 2020;32:106246.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Schonecker S, et al. Atrophy in the thalamus but not cerebellum is specific for C9orf72 FTD and ALS patients - an atlas-based volumetric MRI study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:45.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Westeneng HJ, et al. Widespread structural brain involvement in ALS is not limited to the C9orf72 repeat expansion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(12):1354–1360.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Zhang JQ, et al. Differential impairment of thalamocortical structural connectivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017;23(2):155–161.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Lee SE, et al. Altered network connectivity in frontotemporal dementia with C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Brain. 2014;137(pt 11):3047–3060.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Shoukry RS, et al. Longitudinal changes in resting state networks in early presymptomatic carriers of C9orf72 expansions. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102354.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Lajoie I, et al. Regional cerebral atrophy contributes to personalized survival prediction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicentre, machine learning, deformation-based morphometry study. Ann Neurol. 2025;97(6):1144–1157.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. van Veenhuijzen K, et al. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic C9orf72 mutation carriers distinguishes phenoconverters to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 2025;97(2):281–295.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Mohammadi S, et al. Thalamic alterations in motor neuron diseases: a systematic review of MRI findings. J Integr Neurosci. 2024;23(4):77.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Hinault T, et al. Longitudinal grey matter and metabolic contributions to cognitive changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Commun. 2022;4(5):fcac228.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Machts J, et al. Basal ganglia pathology in ALS is associated with neuropsychological deficits. Neurology. 2015;85(15):1301–1309.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Tu S, et al. Regional thalamic MRI as a marker of widespread cortical pathology and progressive frontotemporal involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(12):1250–1258.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Braak H, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a model of corticofugal axonal spread. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(12):708–714.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Brettschneider J, et al. Stages of pTDP-43 pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(1):20–38.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Inayat S, et al. Low acetylcholine during early sleep is important for motor memory consolidation. Sleep. 2020;43(6):zsz297.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Gott JA, et al. Acetylcholine and metacognition during sleep. Conscious Cogn. 2024;117:103608.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Herrera CG, Tarokh L. A thalamocortical perspective on sleep spindle alterations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Sleep Med Rep. 2024;10(2):103–118.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Brunet A, et al. Cortical circuit dysfunction as a potential driver of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:363.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Luthi A, Nedergaard M. Anything but small: Microarousals stand at the crossroad between noradrenaline signaling and key sleep functions. Neuron. 2025;113(4):509–523.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Osorio-Forero A, et al. Noradrenergic circuit control of non-REM sleep substates. Curr Biol. 2021;31(22):5009–5023.e7.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Swift KM, et al. Abnormal locus coeruleus sleep activity alters sleep signatures of memory consolidation and impairs place cell stability and spatial memory. Curr Biol. 2018;28(22):3599–3609.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Scekic-Zahirovic J, et al. Cortical hyperexcitability in mouse models and patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is linked to noradrenaline deficiency. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16(738):eadg3665.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Bolborea M, et al. Loss of hypothalamic MCH decreases food intake in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145(6):773–791.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Vercruysse P, et al. Hypothalamic alterations in neurodegenerative diseases and their relation to abnormal energy metabolism. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:2.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Gabery S, et al. Loss of the metabolism and sleep regulating neuronal populations expressing orexin and oxytocin in the hypothalamus in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2021;47(7):979–989.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Kolaj M, et al. Intrinsic properties and neuropharmacology of midline paraventricular thalamic nucleus neurons. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Govindaiah G, Cox CL. Modulation of thalamic neuron excitability by orexins. Neuropharmacology. 2006;51(3):414–425.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Ni KM, et al. Selectively driving cholinergic fibers optically in the thalamic reticular nucleus promotes sleep. Elife. 2016;5:e10382.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Lee KH, McCormick DA. Abolition of spindle oscillations by serotonin and norepinephrine in the ferret lateral geniculate and perigeniculate nuclei in vitro. Neuron. 1996;17(2):309–321.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Osorio-Forero A, et al. Infraslow noradrenergic locus coeruleus activity fluctuations are gatekeepers of the NREM-REM sleep cycle. Nat Neurosci. 2025;28(1):84–96.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Brooks BR, et al. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000;1(5):293–299.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Walker NA, et al. Clinical utility of the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep Breath. 2020;24(4):1759–1765.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Buysse DJ, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Ahmed RM, et al. Sleep disorders and respiratory function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;26:33–42.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Lule D, et al. The Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen: a cross-sectional comparison of established screening tools in a German-Swiss population. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(1-2):16–23.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Abrahams S, et al. Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(1-2):9–14.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Loose M, et al. Age and education-matched cut-off scores for the revised German/Swiss-German version of ECAS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17(5-6):374–376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Berry RB, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(5):597–619.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Silber MH, et al. The visual scoring of sleep in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(2):121–131.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Gramfort A, et al. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:267.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Ablin P, et al. Faster independent component analysis by preconditioning with hessian approximations. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2018;66(15):4040–4049.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  94. Dammers J, et al. Integration of amplitude and phase statistics for complete artifact removal in independent components of neuromagnetic recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(10):2353–2362.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Dharmaprani D, et al. A comparison of independent component analysis algorithms and measures to discriminate between EEG and artifact components. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:825–828.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  96. Viola FC, et al. Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(5):868–877.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Winkler I, et al. On the influence of high-pass filtering on ICA-based artifact reduction in EEG-ERP. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:4101–4105.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  98. Lacourse K, et al. A sleep spindle detection algorithm that emulates human expert spindle scoring. J Neurosci Methods. 2019;316:3–11.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. Carrier J, et al. Sleep slow wave changes during the middle years of life. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33(4):758–766.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  100. Virtanen P, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020;17(3):261–272.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Vallat R, Walker MP. An open-source, high-performance tool for automated sleep staging. Elife. 2021;10:e70092.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). Practice guidelines. https://aasm.org/clinical-resources/practice-standards/practice-guidelines/ Accessed December 1, 2025.
  103. Sleep Spindles Detector. Version 2024.12.13. Guillot SJ; 2024. https://github.com/sjg2203/SSp_Detector.
  104. SlμArch. Version 2024.05.16; Guillot SJ. https://github.com/sjg2203/SluArch.
  105. Faul F, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Faul F, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. SHAPIRO SS,, and WILK MBAn analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52(3-4):591–611.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  108. Bartlett MS. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc R Soc A Math Phy. 1937;160:268–282.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  109. Vallat R. Pingouin: statistics in Python. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3(31):1026.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  110. Zimmerman DW. A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004;57(pt 1):173–181.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  111. Rouder JN, et al. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16(2):225–237.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  112. Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin, TX; 2010:25080.
  113. Terpilowski M. scikit-posthocs: Pairwise multiple comparison tests in Python. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4(36):1169.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  114. Waskom M. seaborn: statistical data visualization. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(60):3021.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 6, 2025): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (January 2, 2026): Electronic publication
  • Version 3 (January 12, 2026): Loaded missing equation files

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts