Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains among the most lethal cancers, with metastasis as the primary driver of mortality. While metastatic mechanisms are shared across malignancies, PDAC metastasis poses unique therapeutic challenges due to the presence of extensive tumor heterogeneity, desmoplasia, and immunosuppression — features that enable diverse migratory behaviors and therapeutic resistance. Recent advances have shown that metastatic progression in PDAC emerges from dynamic interactions between tumor cell–intrinsic and microenvironmental factors, each adapting to evolving stressors throughout the metastatic cascade. In the primary tumor, genomic instability and epigenetic reprogramming generate subclones with heightened invasive potential, while dense stromal reactions and myeloid-dominated immune suppression facilitate escape. During circulation, PDAC cells employ distinctive survival strategies through homotypic clustering and heterotypic interactions with blood components. At distant sites, PDAC cells adapt to organ-specific microenvironments through context-dependent metabolic and immune modulation, resulting in phenotypes that diverge from the primary tumor. In this Review, we examine how tumor-stroma crosstalk mechanisms shape metastatic progression in PDAC, provide a framework for understanding why conventional therapies often fail against metastatic disease, and highlight emerging opportunities for stage- and site-specific therapeutic interventions that target these unique adaptations.
Ravikanth Maddipati
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,587 | 0 |
667 | 0 | |
Figure | 309 | 0 |
Table | 63 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 37 | 0 |
Totals | 2,663 | 0 |
Total Views | 2,663 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.