Usage Information
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) diagnosis and management have evolved rapidly alongside the increasing prevalence of obesity and related complications. Hepatology has expanded its focus beyond late-stage cirrhosis and portal hypertension to earlier, complex MASLD cases in younger patients, necessitating closer collaboration with endocrinology. The renaming of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to MASLD reflects its pathophysiology, reduces stigma, and has prompted new research directions. Noninvasive tests such as liver stiffness measurement now play a crucial role in diagnosis, reducing reliance on invasive liver biopsies. However, advanced omics technologies, despite their potential to enhance diagnostic precision and patient stratification, remain underutilized in routine clinical practice. Behavioral factors, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and lifestyle choices, influence disease outcomes and must be integrated into patient management strategies. Primary care settings are critical for early screening to prevent progression to advanced disease, yet sizable challenges remain in implementing effective screening protocols. This Review explores these evolving aspects of MASLD diagnosis and management, emphasizing the need for improved diagnostic tools, multidisciplinary collaboration, and holistic care approaches to address existing gaps and ensure comprehensive patient care across all healthcare levels.
Authors
Mette Munk Lauridsen, Kim Ravnskjaer, Lise Lotte Gluud, Arun J. Sanyal
Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,667 | 638 |
| 1,206 | 246 | |
| Figure | 873 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 119 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,865 | 884 |
| Total Views | 6,749 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)