BACKGROUND The neonatal immune system is uniquely poised to generate broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs), and thus infants are ideal for evaluating HIV vaccine candidates. We present the design and safety of a new-in-infants glucopyranosyl lipid A–stable emulsion (GLA-SE) adjuvant admixed with a first-in-infant CH505 transmitter-founder (CH505TF) gp120 immunogen designed to induce precursors for bnAbs against HIV.METHODS HIV Vaccine Trials Network 135 is a phase I randomized, placebo-controlled trial of CH505TF plus GLA-SE or placebo. Healthy infants aged ≤5 days, born to mothers living with HIV but HIV nucleic acid–negative at birth, were randomized to 5 doses of CH505TF plus GLA-SE or placebo at birth and 8, 16, 32, and 54 weeks.RESULTS Thirty-eight infants (median age 4 days; interquartile range 4–4.75 days) were enrolled November 2020 to January 2022. Among 28 infants assigned to receive CH505TF plus GLA-SE and 10 assigned to receive placebo, most completed the 5-dose immunization series (32/38) and follow-up (35/38). Solicited local and systemic reactions were more frequent in vaccine (8, 28.6% local; 16, 57.1% systemic) versus placebo recipients (1, 10% local, P = 0.25; 4, 40.0% systemic, P = 0.38). All events were grade 1 except 2 grade 2 events (pain, lethargy). Serious vaccine-related adverse events were not recorded.CONCLUSION This study illustrates the feasibility of conducting trials of new-in-infants adjuvanted HIV vaccines in HIV-exposed infants receiving standard infant vaccinations. The safety profile of the CH505TF plus GLA-SE vaccine was reassuring.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04607408.FUNDING National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH under grants UM1AI068614, UM1AI068635, and UM1AI068618.
Avy Violari, Kennedy Otwombe, William Hahn, Shiyu Chen, Deirdre Josipovic, Vuyelwa Baba, Asimenia Angelidou, Kinga K. Smolen, Ofer Levy, Nonhlanhla N. Mkhize, Amanda S. Woodward Davis, Troy M. Martin, Barton F. Haynes, Wilton B. Williams, Zachary K. Sagawa, James G. Kublin, Laura Polakowski, Margaret Brewinski Isaacs, Catherine Yen, Georgia Tomaras, Lawrence Corey, Holly Janes, Glenda E. Gray
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,820 | 11 |
297 | 5 | |
Figure | 132 | 0 |
Table | 89 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 194 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 96 | 0 |
Totals | 2,628 | 16 |
Total Views | 2,644 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.