Growing evidence links human long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) to metabolic disease pathogenesis, yet no FDA-approved drugs target human lncRNAs. Most human lncRNAs lack conservation in other mammals, complicating efforts to define their roles and identify therapeutic targets. Here, we leveraged the concept of functionally conserved lncRNAs (FCLs) — lncRNAs that share function despite no sequence similarity — to develop a framework for identifying human lncRNAs as therapeutic targets for metabolic disorders. We used expression quantitative trait loci mapping and functional conservation analyses to pinpoint human lncRNAs influenced by disease-associated SNPs and with potential functionally conserved mouse equivalents. We identified human and mouse GULLs (glucose and lipid lowering), which regulate glucose and lipid metabolism by binding CRTC2, thereby modulating gluconeogenic genes via CREB and lipogenic genes via SREBP1. Despite their lack of sequence similarity, both lncRNAs demonstrated similar metabolic effects in obese mice, with more pronounced benefits from long-term activation. To identify druggable sites, we mapped GULLs’ binding motifs to CRTC2 (termed GULFs). Standalone human GULF, an RNA oligomer resembling FDA-approved siRNAs, significantly improved glucose and lipid levels in obese mice. This framework highlights functionally conserved human lncRNAs as promising therapeutic targets, exemplified by GULLs’ potential as a glucose- and lipid-lowering therapeutic.
Zhe Li, Sunmi Seok, Chengfei Jiang, Ping Li, Yonghe Ma, Hang Sun, Haiming Cao
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through October 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 875 | 27 |
270 | 15 | |
Figure | 109 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 180 | 10 |
Citation downloads | 14 | 0 |
Totals | 1,448 | 52 |
Total Views | 1,500 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.