Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting ubiquitin-independent proteasome with small molecule increases susceptibility in pan-KRAS–mutant cancer models
Shihui Shen, … , Lei Li, Huaiyu Yang
Shihui Shen, … , Lei Li, Huaiyu Yang
Published March 17, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(6):e185278. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI185278.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Targeting ubiquitin-independent proteasome with small molecule increases susceptibility in pan-KRAS–mutant cancer models

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite advances in the development of direct KRAS inhibitors, KRAS-mutant cancers continue to exhibit resistance to the currently available therapies. Here, we identified REGγ as a mutant KRAS–associated factor that enhanced REGγ transcription through the KRAS intermediate NRF2, suggesting that the REGγ-proteasome is a potential target for pan-KRAS inhibitor development. We elucidated a mechanism involving the KRAS/NRF2/REGγ regulatory axis, which links activated KRAS to the ATP- and ubiquitin-independent proteasome. We subsequently developed RLY01, a REGγ-proteasome inhibitor that effectively suppressed tumor growth in KRAS-mutant cancer models and lung cancer organoids. Notably, the combination of RLY01 and the KRASG12C inhibitor AMG510 exhibited enhanced antitumor efficacy in KRASG12C cancer cells. Collectively, our data support the hypothesis that KRAS mutations enhance the capacity of the REGγ-proteasome by increasing REGγ expression, highlighting the potential of ubiquitin-independent proteasome inhibition as a therapeutic approach for pan-KRAS–mutant cancers.

Authors

Shihui Shen, Qiansen Zhang, Yuhan Wang, Hui Chen, Shuangming Gong, Yun Liu, Conghao Gai, Hansen Chen, Enhao Zhu, Bo Yang, Lin Liu, Siyuan Cao, Mengting Zhao, Wenjie Ren, Mengjuan Li, Zhuoya Peng, Lu Zhang, Shaoying Zhang, Juwen Shen, Bianhong Zhang, Patrick K.H. Lee, Kun Li, Lei Li, Huaiyu Yang

×

Figure 2

Pan-KRAS–mutant cells exhibit selective sensitivity to REGγ inhibition.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pan-KRAS–mutant cells exhibit selective sensitivity to REGγ inhibition.
...
(A) Relative cell viability of HCT8-KRASWT (left) or HCT8-KRASG13D (right) cells with or without REGγ knockdown. Relative cell viability was calculated by setting the values of the shN group (a negative control which was transfected a scramble shRNA) as 100%. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001; P values were measured by 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparison test. (B) REGγ depletion led to selective toxicity toward KRAS-mutant cancer cell lines. Nineteen KRAS-MUT and eleven KRAS-WT cancer cell lines were transfected with shREGγ or a scrambled shRNA. The percentage cell viability is relative to the untreated controls. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 3). **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001; P values were measured by 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparison test. (C) Schematic illustration of the mouse protocol using xenografts derived from colorectal cell lines (HT29, HCT116). (D) Growth curves for HT29 and HCT116 xenografts with or without silencing of REGγ (n = 8). Values represent mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001; P values were measured by 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. (E) Representative colony formation images (left) and relative colony numbers (right) of KRAS-MUT cells with or without REGγ knockdown. (F and G) Ectopically expressed REGγ restored the clonogenic growth of REGγ-depleted cells. REGγOE, REGγ overexpression. The relative viability of cultured colonies in A549 (KRASG12S) and HCT116 (KRASG13D) cells is shown. The percentage cell viability is relative to the untreated controls. Each value represents mean ± SEM (n = 3). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; P values were measured by 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts