Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor-specific surface marker–independent targeting of tumors through nanotechnology and bioorthogonal glycochemistry
Hyesun Hyun, Bo Sun, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Albert Wielgus, Yue Wang, Stephanie Ann Montgomery, Tian Zhang, Jianjun Cheng, Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang
Hyesun Hyun, Bo Sun, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Albert Wielgus, Yue Wang, Stephanie Ann Montgomery, Tian Zhang, Jianjun Cheng, Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Tumor-specific surface marker–independent targeting of tumors through nanotechnology and bioorthogonal glycochemistry

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Biological targeting is crucial for effective cancer treatment with reduced toxicity but is limited by the availability of tumor surface markers. To overcome this, we developed a nanoparticle-based (NP-based), tumor-specific surface marker–independent (TRACER) targeting approach. Utilizing the unique biodistribution properties of NPs, we encapsulated Ac4ManNAz (Maz) to selectively label tumors with azide-reactive groups. Surprisingly, while NP-delivered Maz was cleared by the liver, it did not label macrophages, potentially reducing off-target effects. To exploit this tumor-specific labeling, we functionalized anti–4-1BB Abs with dibenzocyclooctyne to target azide-labeled tumor cells and activate the immune response. In syngeneic B16F10 melanoma and orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer models, TRACER enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of anti–4-1BB, increasing the median survival time. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ T and NK cells with TRACER. Importantly, TRACER reduced the hepatotoxicity associated with anti–4-1BB, resulting in normal serum ALT and AST levels and decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration into the liver. Quantitative analysis confirmed a 4.5-fold higher tumor-to-liver ratio of anti–4-1BB accumulation with TRACER compared with conventional anti–4-1BB Abs. Our work provides a promising approach for developing targeted cancer therapies that circumvent limitations imposed by the paucity of tumor-specific markers, potentially improving efficacy and reducing off-target effects to overcome the liver toxicity associated with anti–4-1BB.

Authors

Hyesun Hyun, Bo Sun, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Albert Wielgus, Yue Wang, Stephanie Ann Montgomery, Tian Zhang, Jianjun Cheng, Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang

×

Figure 7

TRACER-mediated in vivo delivery of anti–4-1BB in C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 tumors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
TRACER-mediated in vivo delivery of anti–4-1BB in C57BL/6 mice bearing B...
(A) Schematic of B16F10 tumor inoculation, treatments with free Maz or MazNP, and time points for liver collection. (B) Representative fluorescence images of liver tissue sections (green: DBCO-Cy5; blue: nuclei stained with Hoechst 33258) are shown again in Supplemental Figure 20. Scale bars: 20 μm. (C) Quantitative analysis of DBCO-Cy5–stained liver sections (n = 3 per group). The percentage of azide+ area was estimated as the area of the DBCO-Cy5+ area (green) divided by the area of the tissue in the field of view (outlined by blue Hoechst 33258 staining). Randomly selected fields (9 images per group; Supplemental Figure 20) were analyzed with Fiji software. ****P < 0.0001, by unpaired, 2-tailed t test. (D) Schematic of B16F10 tumor inoculation, treatments, and time points for tissue collection. Mice received anti–4-1BB–biotin (n = 4), free Maz plus DBCO–anti–4-1BB–biotin (n = 4), or DBCO–anti–4-1BB-biotin (n = 8) via the TRACER approach at specified time points. (E) Tumor/liver ratio of biotin-labeled Abs 24 hours after injection in B16F10 tumor–bearing mice. **P < 0.01, by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test following 1-way ANOVA.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts