Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor-specific surface marker–independent targeting of tumors through nanotechnology and bioorthogonal glycochemistry
Hyesun Hyun, … , Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang
Hyesun Hyun, … , Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang
Published March 11, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(9):e184964. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI184964.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Tumor-specific surface marker–independent targeting of tumors through nanotechnology and bioorthogonal glycochemistry

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Biological targeting is crucial for effective cancer treatment with reduced toxicity but is limited by the availability of tumor surface markers. To overcome this, we developed a nanoparticle-based (NP-based), tumor-specific surface marker–independent (TRACER) targeting approach. Utilizing the unique biodistribution properties of NPs, we encapsulated Ac4ManNAz (Maz) to selectively label tumors with azide-reactive groups. Surprisingly, while NP-delivered Maz was cleared by the liver, it did not label macrophages, potentially reducing off-target effects. To exploit this tumor-specific labeling, we functionalized anti–4-1BB Abs with dibenzocyclooctyne to target azide-labeled tumor cells and activate the immune response. In syngeneic B16F10 melanoma and orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer models, TRACER enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of anti–4-1BB, increasing the median survival time. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ T and NK cells with TRACER. Importantly, TRACER reduced the hepatotoxicity associated with anti–4-1BB, resulting in normal serum ALT and AST levels and decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration into the liver. Quantitative analysis confirmed a 4.5-fold higher tumor-to-liver ratio of anti–4-1BB accumulation with TRACER compared with conventional anti–4-1BB Abs. Our work provides a promising approach for developing targeted cancer therapies that circumvent limitations imposed by the paucity of tumor-specific markers, potentially improving efficacy and reducing off-target effects to overcome the liver toxicity associated with anti–4-1BB.

Authors

Hyesun Hyun, Bo Sun, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Albert Wielgus, Yue Wang, Stephanie Ann Montgomery, Tian Zhang, Jianjun Cheng, Jonathan S. Serody, Andrew Z. Wang

×

Figure 6

MazNP does not generate azide groups on macrophage surfaces.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
MazNP does not generate azide groups on macrophage surfaces.
(A) Azide g...
(A) Azide group generation on the surface of J774A.1 macrophages incubated with PBS, free Maz, or non-PEGylated MazNP for 6 hours or (B) 24 hours. Cells were imaged with a confocal microscope (white: LysoTracker; green: streptavidin-FITC; red: rhodamine-labeled MazNP; blue: nuclei stained with Hoechst 33258). Scale bars: 10 μm. (C) Time-dependent cell-surface azide expression following treatments with free Maz or MazNP, as determined by flow cytometry. The representative flow cytometry histogram shows cell-surface azide expression at 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours after treatment. (D) Quantification of cell-surface azide expression, shown as the MFI of streptavidin-FITC, as presented in C. n = 6 identically and independently prepared samples (mean ± SD). ****P < 0.0001, by Šidák’s multiple-comparison test following 2-way ANOVA. (E) Azide group generation on J774A.1 macrophages treated with CQ prior to a 6-hour incubation with PBS, free Maz, or non-PEGylated MazNP. Cells were imaged with a confocal microscope (green: streptavidin-FITC; red: rhodamine-labeled MazNP; blue: nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342). Scale bars: 10 μm. (F) Representative flow cytometry histograms showing cell-surface azide expression with or without CQ pretreatment in the free Maz and MazNP groups. (G) Quantification of cell-surface azide expression shown as the ratio of MFI of streptavidin-FITC relative to CQ–(CQ+ to CQ–). n = 6 identically and independently prepared samples (mean ± SD). ****P < 0.0001, by unpaired, 2-tailed t test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts