A large body of evidence suggests that single- and multiple-strain probiotics and synbiotics could have roles in the management of specific gastrointestinal disorders. However, ongoing concerns regarding the quality and heterogeneity of the clinical data, safety in vulnerable populations, and the lack of regulation of products containing live microbes are barriers to widespread clinical use. Safety and regulatory issues must be addressed and new technologies considered. One alternative future strategy is the use of synthetic bacterial communities, defined as manually assembled consortia of two or more bacteria originally derived from the human gastrointestinal tract. Synthetic bacterial communities can model functional, ecological, and structural aspects of native communities within the gastrointestinal tract, occupying varying nutritional niches and providing the host with a stable, robust, and diverse gut microbiota that can prevent pathobiont colonization by way of colonization resistance. Alternatively, phage therapy is the use of lytic phage to treat bacterial infections. The rise of antimicrobial resistance has led to renewed interest in phage therapy, and the high specificity of phages for their hosts has spurred interest in using phage-based approaches to precisely modulate the microbiome. In this Review, we consider the present and future of microbiome-targeting therapies, with a special focus on early-life applications, such as prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Lauren E. Lynch, Rachel Lahowetz, Christian Maresso, Austen Terwilliger, Jason Pizzini, Valeria Melendez Hebib, Robert A. Britton, Anthony W. Maresso, Geoffrey A. Preidis
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,206 | 0 |
276 | 0 | |
Figure | 206 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 84 | 0 |
Totals | 1,772 | 0 |
Total Views | 1,772 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.