Advertisement

Clinical Research and Public HealthEndocrinologyOncology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI183583

Survival of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance

Nima Sharifi,1,2 Robert Diaz,1,2 Hui-Ming Lin,3,4 Evan Roberts,1,2 Lisa G. Horvath,3,4,5,6,7 Andrew Martin,7,8,9 Martin R. Stockler,7,8 Sonia Yip,7,8 Vinod V. Subhash,7 Neil Portman,3,4,7 Ian D. Davis,7,10,11 and Christopher J. Sweeney7,12

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Sharifi, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Diaz, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Lin, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Roberts, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Horvath, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Martin, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Stockler, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Yip, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Subhash, V. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Portman, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Davis, I. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Desai Sethi Urology Institute and

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

3Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

4School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

5Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

6Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

7Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

8National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

9Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

10Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Find articles by Sweeney, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published September 17, 2024 - More info

Published in Volume 134, Issue 18 on September 17, 2024
J Clin Invest. 2024;134(18):e183583. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI183583.
© 2024 Sharifi et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published September 17, 2024 - Version history
Received: June 5, 2024; Accepted: July 23, 2024
View PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is androgen dependent, and its treatment includes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadal testosterone suppression. Since 2014, overall survival (OS) has been prolonged with addition of other systemic therapies, such as adrenal androgen synthesis blockers, potent androgen receptor blockers, or docetaxel, to ADT. HSD3B1 encodes the rate-limiting enzyme for nongonadal androgen synthesis, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1, and has a common adrenal-permissive missense-encoding variant that confers increased synthesis of potent androgens from nongonadal precursor steroids and poorer prostate cancer outcomes.

METHODS. Our prespecified hypothesis was that poor outcome associated with inheritance of the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele with ADT alone is reversed in patients with low-volume (LV) mHSPC with up-front ADT plus addition of androgen receptor (AR) antagonists to inhibit the effect of adrenal androgens. HSD3B1 genotype was obtained in 287 patients with LV disease treated with ADT + AR antagonist only in the phase III Enzalutamide in First Line Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer (ENZAMET) trial and was associated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS. Patients who inherited the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele had more favorable 5-year clinical progression-free survival and OS when treated with ADT plus enzalutamide or ADT plus nonsteroidal antiandrogen compared with their counterparts who did not have adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance. HSD3B1 was also associated with OS after accounting for known clinical variables. Patients with both genotypes benefited from early enzalutamide.

CONCLUSION. These data demonstrated an inherited physiologic driver of prostate cancer mortality is associated with clinical outcomes and is potentially pharmacologically reversible.

FUNDING. National Cancer Institute, NIH; Department of Defense; Prostate Cancer Foundation, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Introduction

Prostate cancer has long been recognized to be an androgen-dependent disease, with some cancers being more dependent than others. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadal testosterone suppression has therefore been the standard of care for up-front treatment of metastatic prostate cancer for over 80 years (1). The up-front treatment for advanced disease has become highly complex, with treatment intensification having been integrated as part of the standard of care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), including therapies such as chemotherapy (docetaxel), androgen receptor (AR) antagonists (enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide), and adrenal androgen synthesis inhibition (abiraterone) (2). The complexity of up-front treatment will continue to increase as other treatments are also introduced in this setting and as systemic therapies are given in earlier disease states that also necessitate longer treatment durations. There is frequently an absence of consensus on which patients should get which combinations. Furthermore, there is currently very limited and no standard role for germline genetic testing in selecting the best up-front therapy for an individual man with prostate cancer, nor is there any role for integrating information on variations in an individual’s physiology (3). Ongoing efforts include those to test the potential role for poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibition on the basis of alterations in DNA damage repair pathway genes (4).

Inhibition of the gonadal androgen axis with ADT leaves the adrenal androgen axis intact as the major source for extragonadal androgens. The most abundant steroid in circulation is dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA; in free and sulfated forms), which is made by human adrenals and is converted in prostate cancer tissues to potent androgens, i.e., testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, which in turn drive ADT resistance. The first and rate-limiting enzyme that converts DHEA to potent androgens is 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 (3βHSD1; encoded by HSD3B1). The adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 (1245C) allele (so termed because it enables tumors to use adrenal precursors) is a common missense-encoding variant, resulting in a stable form of the enzyme that increases metabolic flux from DHEA to dihydrotestosterone, and is widely validated to confer less benefit from gonadal testosterone suppression alone across many cohorts of men with prostate cancer from around the world (Figure 1A) (5–12). About half of all men with prostate cancer inherit at least 1 copy of the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele, which is associated with more rapid ADT resistance and poorer survival in men with nonmetastatic disease and low-volume (LV) metastatic disease (6, 8). In mHSPC, LV disease is generally more AR dependent, with less benefit from chemotherapy, compared with high-volume (HV) disease and evidence of a higher AR gene expression profile (13–15). Furthermore, in a study of over 5,200 men that also includes those with localized disease, adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele homozygosity is associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer death, thus making it the most common monogenic link to prostate cancer mortality (16, 17).

HSD3B1 genotype regulates nongonadal androgen synthesis and drives prostateFigure 1

HSD3B1 genotype regulates nongonadal androgen synthesis and drives prostate cancer progression following ADT. (A) The adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 (1245C) genotype encodes a more active enzyme, resulting in increased synthesis of nongonadal androgens, leading to more rapid progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer and increased prostate cancer mortality. (B) Up-front AR blockade given with ADT in the ENZAMET study is expected to prevent worse clinical outcomes and mortality associated with adrenal-permissive allele inheritance.

We hypothesized that up-front pharmacologic blockade by use of AR antagonists alone with ADT would reverse the poor outcomes and survival associated with the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele in patients with LV metastatic disease (Figure 1B). Enzalutamide in First Line Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer (ENZAMET) is a practice-changing randomized trial that used treatment with direct AR blockade plus ADT in both arms (18, 19). The treatment comparison was use of a more effective AR blocker (enzalutamide) versus a weaker nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA). The hypothesis was prespecified in a grant funded in 2019 (Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Department of Defense W81XWH-20-1-0137) and included HSD3B1 genotype categorization and determination of whether poor outcomes for adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance could be reversed with up-front blockade of nongonadal androgens.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study cohort are in Tables 1 and 2, and the CONSORT diagram is in Figure 2. Of the 287 patients with LV metastatic disease on the trial who were treated with ADT + AR blocker on either arm, had DNA available, and did not receive concurrent docetaxel, 147 inherited the adrenal-permissive genotype, and 140 inherited the adrenal-restrictive genotype. At progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), patients were treated with standard-of-care therapies. Of the entire cohort treated with ADT + NSAA, 85% received life-prolonging therapy (enzalutamide, abiraterone, and chemotherapy), and other treatments could have included antiandrogen withdrawal therapy (19). Thus, a large majority of patients in this study were treated with enzalutamide either for mHSPC or for metastatic CRPC. Although prior data showed men treated with ADT alone and who had adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance had poorer outcomes (6, 8), we observed in the ENZAMET trial that patients with adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance (Figure 1A) (6, 8) treated with ADT + enzalutamide or less potent antiandrogens (mostly bicalutamide) had better overall survival (OS) compared with patients with adrenal-restrictive HSD3B1 inheritance (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.36–0.84; P = 0.0052) (Figure 3A). Similarly, clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) also favored the adrenal-permissive group (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.50–0.97; P = 0.031) (Figure 3B). The lower HR (OS) than HR (cPFS) may relate to the high rate of enzalutamide therapy at the time of progression to castration resistance in the ADT + NSAA arm (19).

CONSORT diagram detailing the entire ENZAMET mHSPC cohort and the LV diseasFigure 2

CONSORT diagram detailing the entire ENZAMET mHSPC cohort and the LV disease study cohort for the HSD3B1 analysis.

Up-front AR blockade reverses the poor outcomes associated with adrenal-perFigure 3

Up-front AR blockade reverses the poor outcomes associated with adrenal-permissive allele inheritance. (A and B) Kaplan-Meier plots showing OS (A) and cPFS (B) according to HSD3B1 genotype. (C) Five-year OS and cPFS by treatment arm and HSD3B1 genotype.

Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of cohorts

Table 2

Baseline clinical characteristics of study cohort by HSD3B1 genotype

In the enzalutamide + ADT arm, HSD3B1 comparisons for cPFS showed HR = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.29–1.00; P = 0.046) and for OS showed HR = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.25–1.01; P = 0.066). In the ADT + NSAA arm, comparisons for cPFS showed HR = 0.85 (95% CI = 0.57–1.26; P = 0.42) and for OS showed HR = 0.60 (95% CI = 0.36–1.02; P = 0.056) (Supplemental Figures 1 and 2; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI183583DS1). The 5-year cPFS and OS for both genotypes and treatment arms are shown in Figure 3C. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 was associated with better OS and cPFS when treated with ADT plus an antiandrogen even after accounting for other clinical variables (Tables 3 and 4). Exploratory OS and cPFS outcomes with 0, 1, and 2 adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 alleles are shown in Supplemental Figures 3 and 4 and limited because of smaller numbers of patients for the homozygous adrenal-permissive groups.

Table 3

Univariable Cox regression analyses of clinical variables of study cohort

Table 4

Multivariable Cox regression analyses of HSD3B1 genotype with 6 clinical variables in study cohort

Discussion

The missense-encoding adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele, which is present in about half of all men, enables prostate cancer intratumoral androgen biosynthesis from nongonadal precursor steroids, thus linking this genetically driven mechanism to poorer clinical outcomes across multiple cohorts and settings, including localized and metastatic disease. A major question arising from the clinical data to date is whether these poor clinical outcomes with adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele inheritance are pharmacologically reversible by blocking the effects of augmented intratumoral androgen biosynthesis or if the poor outcomes persist despite hormonal therapy intensification. The data presented in this paper indicate that up-front blockade of nongonadal androgens with direct AR antagonism not only appears to reverse the poor outcomes driven by adrenal-permissive allele inheritance reported in other cohorts but also may improve outcomes beyond those for men who do not have adrenal-permissive allele inheritance (i.e., adrenal-restrictive inheritance). This could be biologically plausible if prostate cancers in men with the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genotype are more (nongonadal) androgen dependent compared with adrenal-restrictive HSD3B1 tumors, with the latter having a decreased capacity to use and depend on extragonadal androgens. Tumors that harbor the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genotype and have an apparent nongonadal androgen dependency could use either adrenal androgens or de novo androgen biosynthesis in the tumors from cholesterol. Both adrenal and de novo pathways require the same enzymatic steps catalyzed by 3βHSD1 and are necessary to make testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (20). The interaction between HSD3B1 genotype and clinical outcomes in this study is apparent both with weaker (NSAA) and stronger (enzalutamide) AR antagonists. Further, an augmented effect on reversal of poor adrenal-permissive inheritance–associated outcomes on cPFS appears to be conferred to a greater extent by enzalutamide than by the weaker antiandrogen. It should also be highlighted that the improved outcomes with early enzalutamide were still observed in patients with the adrenal-restrictive genotype.

ENZAMET is the third randomized phase III trial in mHSPC analyzed for outcomes by HSD3B1 genotype. Analysis of E3805, a trial of ADT plus or minus docetaxel and no mandate of long-term antiandrogen with ADT, demonstrated worse outcomes with ADT for adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 inheritance in LV disease but no significant difference by HSD3B1 genotype in HV disease (8). ARCHES is a trial of ADT plus or minus enzalutamide (21). However, of those who underwent HSD3B1 genotyping with a median follow-up of about 46 months, less than 10% of patients with LV disease in the ADT + enzalutamide arm experienced progression (22). Thus, the HSD3B1 analysis in ARCHES is limited by a small number of events for LV disease because of shorter follow-up. The ARCHES results are driven by clinical events in HV disease, in which there were no significant cPFS differences by HSD3B1 genotype (22). Nevertheless, the common finding between E3805 and ARCHES is that there is no significant association between HSD3B1 genotype and clinical progression in HV mHSPC.

It is possible that these data are also influenced by somatic mutations that are known to occur in mHSPC, including in PTEN, Rb1, and p53 (23, 24). However, studies to date have not identified any profound associations between somatic genetic alterations and germline HSD3B1 in prostate cancer, and thus, a bias because of co-occurring somatic mutations is unlikely (25, 26). Instead, adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genotypes are associated with increased cell cycle regulation and AR signaling signatures (25, 26). However, other tumor-level alterations in HSD3B1 are known to occur, including somatic mutations (5), phosphorylation of the 3βHSD1 protein (27), regulation by cancer-associated fibroblasts (28), and regulation by hypoxia-dependent mechanisms (29, 30), which may contribute to clinical outcomes.

It is unknown whether patients with LV mHSPC and the adrenal-permissive allele treated with abiraterone, an inhibitor of gonadal and extragonadal androgen synthesis inhibition, would experience the same effect observed with antiandrogens in this study. Notably, abiraterone has a steroidal structure and is susceptible to metabolism by enzymes that usually metabolize endogenous steroids. Principally, the steroid A and B rings of abiraterone are identical to DHEA, which makes both substrates of 3βHSD1. Abiraterone is converted by 3βHSD1 to Δ4-abiraterone (31) and 5α-abiraterone (32), which have AR antagonist and partial AR agonist activity, respectively. Nevertheless, the ultimate clinical consequences of lower or higher abiraterone metabolism with the adrenal-restrictive or adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 alleles are not known (33).

Limitations of this analysis include the exclusion of the patients chosen for docetaxel. The hypothesis pertained to patients treated with ADT + NSAA or enzalutamide without docetaxel. Men for whom docetaxel was selected (physician’s choice) in general had worse prognostic disease (19). The absence of an ADT-alone cohort in this trial precludes the ability to directly observe whether the reversal of survival outcomes by HSD3B1 genotype is real or due to bias associated with the genotypes in the data set. However, an accounting for other known clinical variables does not appear to suggest a bias (Tables 2 and 4). Additional analyses in other studies with ADT-alone comparator arms should resolve this question.

Genetic biomarkers have not been incorporated into practice-changing clinical trials for up-front treatment of metastatic prostate cancer to date. Rational integration of genetic biomarkers is necessary for patient selection as additional combination therapy trials are developed and treatments move into earlier disease settings, which also necessitate longer treatment durations that must be balanced by a consideration of the resultant increase in adverse effects. The prostate cancer mortality data associated with HSD3B1 (16, 17), combined with the pharmacologic actionability inferred by this study, together suggest that HSD3B1 should also be interrogated in ongoing hormonal therapy studies in earlier disease states, including PROTEUS (NCT03767255), ENZARAD (NCT02446444), DASL-HiCaP (NCT0436353), NRG-GU008 (NCT04134260), NRG-GU009 (NCT04513717), and others. As a germline biomarker, HSD3B1 circumvents the caveats of detecting somatic alterations, which include tumor DNA fraction, tumor heterogeneity, or the potential necessity of invasive tumor biopsies (24, 34, 35). The relative simplicity of obtaining germline DNA combined with an established mechanism through which HSD3B1 inheritance confers resistance to castration using an extragonadal androgen-dependent mechanism strongly supports integration of HSD3B1 into prostate cancer clinical trials in development, and thus the potential role of HSD3B1 in routine clinical care remains to be determined.

Finally, these data further highlight the potential for development of pharmacologic inhibitors against 3βHSD1, particularly for patients who harbor the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele. The apparent sensitivity of adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 tumors to up-front, intensified hormonal therapy raises the possibility of even better clinical outcomes with direct 3βHSD1 enzyme inhibitors. Strategies for developmental therapeutics include competitive enzymatic inhibition of 3βHSD1 or inhibition of 3βHSD1 phosphorylation using blockade of the BMX tyrosine kinase (27, 36).

In conclusion, ENZAMET is the first randomized study with sufficient power and follow-up to test the effect of up-front AR blockade in LV mHSPC. Use of NSAA in the control arm enabled testing for the HSD3B1 genotype interaction with both potent (enzalutamide) and modest (NSAA) blockade of the effects of sustained extragonadal androgen biosynthesis that occurs with the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele. The data presented in this paper demonstrated that an inherited physiologic driver of prostate cancer mortality, adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genotype, which has been shown to be associated with poorer clinical outcomes in nonmetastatic HSPC and mHSPC, is potentially pharmacologically reversible with potent AR antagonism. Together, these data indicate that HSD3B1 inheritance may drive a fundamental and mechanistic aspect of prostate cancer physiology that is pharmacologically actionable and reversible.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Prostate cancer generally affects men. Therefore, this study included only men with prostate cancer.

Genotyping and definitions. HSD3B1 genotyping was performed in 2023 using a method previously described (6, 37). The association between clinical outcomes and the adrenal-permissive genotype (1+ adrenal-permissive alleles) versus adrenal-restrictive genotypes (0 adrenal-permissive alleles) was determined. The cutoff date of the clinical data was the same as for the planned primary OS analysis of the trial (January 19, 2022) (19). OS was defined as time from randomization of the participant until death from any cause or the date of last known follow-up. cPFS was defined as the earliest sign of radiographic progression using the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria (38) for bone lesions and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) (39) for soft-tissue lesions, symptoms attributable to cancer progression, or initiation of another anticancer treatment for prostate cancer.

Statistics. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. HRs were estimated by Cox regression. The 5-year time point was used to compare long-term outcomes as median OS was not met for the groups of interest. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.2.3) with the packages survival (version 3.5-7) and survminer (version 0.4.9). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants as previously published in the ENZAMET trial. Ethical approval was obtained to test this hypothesis by genotyping germline DNA collected from patients enrolled on ENZAMET, as approved separately in each region.

Data availability. The Supporting Data Values are provided in an XLS file.

Author contributions

NS conceptualized the genetic analysis; HML, LGH, IDD, and CS designed the research study; RD performed genotyping analysis; LGH, AM, MS, SY, VS, NP, IDD, and CS performed research related to the clinical trial; NS wrote the first manuscript draft; and ER and all other authors critically reviewed and contributed to the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View ICMJE disclosure forms

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

NS is supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, NIH (R01CA172382, R01CA236780, R01CA261995, and R01CA249279); Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Department of Defense (W81XWH-20-1-0137); and Prostate Cancer Foundation. IDD is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (no. 2016274). LGH is supported by an Australian NHMRC Investigator Grant (no. 1196225). ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304) is a collaborative investigator-initiated trial led by the ANZUP in collaboration with the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, who provided central study coordination. This ANZUP investigator–initiated study was financially supported by Astellas. ANZUP was supported by the Australian Government through a Cancer Australia Infrastructure Grant. The NHMRC CTC was supported by an NHMRC Program Grant. We thank the patients, principal investigators, and study coordinators at the participating centers across the world for their commitment to this translational research study using biospecimens collected as part of the ENZAMET trial.

Address correspondence to: Nima Sharifi, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Rosenstiel Medical Science Building, 1600 NW 10th Ave., 6026, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. Phone: 305.243.1350; Email: nimasharifi@miami.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: NS is a coinventor on a Cleveland Clinic patent (US 9,856,536 B2) on HSD3B1.

Copyright: © 2024, Sharifi et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2024;134(18):e183583. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI183583.

References
  1. Dai C, et al. Targeting the androgen signaling axis in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(26):4267–4278.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Gillessen S, et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022. Eur J Cancer. 2023;185:178–215.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Hofmann MR, et al. Prostate Cancer Foundation hormone-sensitive prostate cancer biomarker working group meeting summary. Urology. 2021;155:165–171.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Martinez Chanza N, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in patients presenting with localized or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022;25(2):199–207.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Chang KH, et al. A gain-of-function mutation in DHT synthesis in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cell. 2013;154(5):1074–1084.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Hearn JWD, et al. HSD3B1 and resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1435–1444.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Agarwal N, et al. Independent validation of effect of HSD3B1 genotype on response to androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(6):856–857.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Hearn JWD, et al. HSD3B1 genotype and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(4):e196496.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Shiota M, et al. Association of missense polymorphism in HSD3B1 with outcomes among men with prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy or abiraterone. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e190115.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Khalaf DJ, et al. HSD3B1 (1245A>C) germline variant and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide: results from two prospective studies. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(9):1186–1197.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Lu C, et al. Treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide does not overcome poor outcome from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in men with the germline homozygous HSD3B1 c.1245C genotype. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(9):1178–1185.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Thomas L, Sharifi N. Germline HSD3B1 genetics and prostate cancer outcomes. Urology. 2020;145:13–21.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Kyriakopoulos CE, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(11):1080–1087.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Hamid AA, et al. Transcriptional profiling of primary prostate tumor in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and association with clinical outcomes: correlative analysis of the E3805 CHAARTED trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(9):1157–1166.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Vale CL, et al. Which patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer benefit from docetaxel: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(7):783–797.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. McKay RR, Nelson T. Adrenal-permissive germline HSD3B1 allele and prostate cancer outcomes. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e242976.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Schiffer L, Sharifi N. Adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genotype-an invisible stimulator of prostate cancer mortality. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e243402.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Davis ID, et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):121–131.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Sweeney CJ, et al. Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(4):323–334.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Hettel D, Sharifi N. HSD3B1 status as a biomarker of androgen deprivation resistance and implications for prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(3):191–196.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Armstrong AJ, et al. ARCHES: a randomized, phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy with enzalutamide or placebo in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32):2974–2986.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Sharifi N, et al. HSD3B1 genotype and outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy and enzalutamide: ARCHES. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(8):101644.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Hamid AA, et al. Compound genomic alterations of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 tumor suppressors in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):89–97.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Warner EW, et al. Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping. Nat Cancer. 2024;5(1):114–130.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Chen WS, et al. Germline polymorphisms associated with impaired survival outcomes and somatic tumor alterations in advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;23(2):316–323.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Antonarakis ES, et al. The influence of the germline HSD3B1 adrenal-permissive variant (c.1100 C) on somatic alteration landscape, transcriptome, and immune-cell infiltration in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 4):215.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  27. Li X, et al. BMX controls 3βHSD1 and sex steroid biosynthesis in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(2):e163498.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Cui D, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-secreted glucosamine alters the androgen biosynthesis program in prostate cancer via HSD3B1 upregulation. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(7):e161913.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Qin L, et al. Chronic hypoxia stabilizes 3βHSD1 via autophagy suppression. Cell Rep. 2024;43(1):113575.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Qin L, et al. Hypoxia-reoxygenation couples 3βHSD1 enzyme and cofactor upregulation to facilitate androgen biosynthesis and hormone therapy resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(13):2417–2430.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Li Z, et al. Conversion of abiraterone to D4A drives anti-tumour activity in prostate cancer. Nature. 2015;523(7560):347–351.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Li Z, et al. Redirecting abiraterone metabolism to biochemically fine tune prostate cancer anti-androgen therapy. Nature. 2016;533:547–551.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Alyamani M, et al. HSD3B1(1245a>c) variant regulates dueling abiraterone metabolite effects in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(8):3333–3340.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Romanel A, et al. Plasma AR and abiraterone-resistant prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(312):312re10.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Beltran H, et al. Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat Med. 2016;22(3):298–305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Qiu Y. A phosphorylation switch controls androgen biosynthesis in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(2):e166499.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Alyamani M, et al. Approaches to assessing 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1. Methods Enzymol. 2023;689:89–119.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Scher HI, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1148–1159.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 17, 2024): Electronic publication
Advertisement
Advertisement