Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Identification of potent biparatopic antibodies targeting FGFR2 fusion–driven cholangiocarcinoma
Saireudee Chaturantabut, … , Nabeel Bardeesy, William R. Sellers
Saireudee Chaturantabut, … , Nabeel Bardeesy, William R. Sellers
Published February 27, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(8):e182417. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI182417.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Identification of potent biparatopic antibodies targeting FGFR2 fusion–driven cholangiocarcinoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Translocations involving FGFR2 gene fusions are common in cholangiocarcinoma and predict response to FGFR kinase inhibitors. However, response rates and durability are limited due to the emergence of resistance, typically involving FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, and to suboptimal dosing, relating to drug adverse effects. Here, we develop biparatopic antibodies targeting the FGFR2 extracellular domain (ECD) as candidate therapeutics. Biparatopic antibodies can overcome drawbacks of bivalent monospecific antibodies, which often show poor inhibitory or even agonist activity against oncogenic receptors. We show that oncogenic transformation by FGFR2 fusions requires an intact ECD. Moreover, by systematically generating biparatopic antibodies targeting distinct epitope pairs in FGFR2 ECD, we identified antibodies that effectively block signaling and malignant growth driven by FGFR2 fusions. Importantly, these antibodies demonstrate efficacy in vivo, synergy with FGFR inhibitors, and activity against FGFR2 fusions harboring kinase domain mutations. Thus, we believe that biparatopic antibodies may serve as an innovative treatment option for patients with FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors

Saireudee Chaturantabut, Sydney Oliver, Dennie T. Frederick, Jiwan J. Kim, Foxy P. Robinson, Alessandro Sinopoli, Tian-Yu Song, Yao He, Yuan-Chen Chang, Diego J. Rodriguez, Liang Chang, Devishi Kesar, Meilani Ching, Ruvimbo Dzvurumi, Adel Atari, Yuen-Yi Tseng, Nabeel Bardeesy, William R. Sellers

×

Figure 7

Combinations of biparatopic antibodies with FGFR inhibitors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Combinations of biparatopic antibodies with FGFR inhibitors.
(A and B) B...
(A and B) Biparatopic antibody B/D (A) or B/C (B) with Infigratinib, Futibatinib, or Pemigatinib combination dose response matrices in the presence of absence of FGF10. 1 = 100% viability and 0= 0% viability after indicated treatment. (C) Heatmap showing Bliss scores calculated from dose response matrices using SynergyFinder (39) application for drug combination analysis. (D and E) Viability of NIH3T3 cells stably expressed FGFR2-AHCYL1 with V565I or V565F mutations treated with bpAb-B/D, bpAb-B/C, or IgG1 (n = 3). (F) Immunoblot analysis of NIH3T3 cells stably expressing FGFR2-AHCYL1 with V565I or V565F treatment with bpAb-B/D, bpAb-B/C, or IgG1 for 5 hours (n = 3). (G and H) Quantification of internalization/degradation signals in FGFR2-AHCYL1 with V565I or V565F–expressing NIH3T3 cells treated with biparatopic antibody bpAb-B/C, bpAb-B/D, or IgG1 from 0–38 hours after incubation. (I) Viability of CCLP-1 cells stably expressed FGFR2–PHGDH fusion with V565F mutation upon treatment with IgG1, bpAb-B/D, or bpAb-B/C alone or in combination with Infigratinib (percentage compared with IgG1 treated control) (n = 3). (J) Immunoblot analysis of CCLP-1 cell line expressing FGFR2-PHGDH with V565F mutation upon treatment with IgG1, bpAb-B/C, bpAb-B/D, IgG1+Infigratinib, bpAb-B/C + Infigratinib, or bpAb-B/D + Infigratinib for 5 hours. (K) Deletion mutations derived from 4 different patients and the respective FGFR2 ECD. (L) Viability of 4 patient-derived N-terminus oncogenic mutants upon treatments with IgG1, bpAb-B/C, or bpAb-B/D as indicated (percentage viability compared with IgG1) (n = 3). (M) Immunoblot of NIH-3T3 cells bearing an FGFR2 H167_N173 in-frame deletion allele (patient 2) after treatment with IgG, bpAb-B/C, bpAb-B/D, or the relevant parental antibodies for 5 hours. All data are mean ± SEM. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts