BACKGROUND Decoding the clinical impact of genetic variants is particularly important for precision medicine in cancer. Genetic screening of mainly patients with breast and ovarian cancer has identified numerous BRCA1/BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that remain unclassified owing to a lack of pedigrees and functional data.METHODS Here, we used CRISPR-Select — a technology that exploits unique inbuilt controls at the endogenous locus — to assess 54 rare ClinVar VUS located in the PALB2-binding domain of BRCA2. Variant deleteriousness was examined in the absence and presence of PARPi, cisplatin, or mitomycin C.RESULTS Marked functional deficiency was observed for variants in the exon 2 donor splice region (A22 = c.66A>C, A22 = c.66A>G, A22 = c.66A>T, and D23H) and Trp31 aa (W31G, W31L, and W31C), both critical for BRCA2 function. Moreover, T10K and G25R resulted in an intermediate phenotype, suggesting these variants are hypomorphic in nature. Combining our functional results with the latest ClinGen BRCA1/2 Variant Curation Expert Panel recommendations, we classified 49 of the 54 VUS as either likely benign (n = 45) or likely pathogenic (n = 4).CONCLUSION Therefore, CRISPR-Select is an important tool for efficient variant clinical classification. Application of this technology in the future will ultimately improve patient care.FUNDING Danish Cancer Society, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sygeforsikring Danmark, Børnecancerfonden, Neye-Fonden, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH.
Muthiah Bose, Manika Indrajit Singh, Morten Frödin, Bent Ejlertsen, Claus S. Sørensen, Maria Rossing
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,869 | 20 |
428 | 7 | |
Figure | 225 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 341 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 2,914 | 27 |
Total Views | 2,941 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.