Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Durable responses to ATR inhibition with ceralasertib in tumors with genomic defects and high inflammation
Magnus T. Dillon, Jeane Guevara, Kabir Mohammed, Emmanuel C. Patin, Simon A. Smith, Emma Dean, Gemma N. Jones, Sophie E. Willis, Marcella Petrone, Carlos Silva, Khin Thway, Catey Bunce, Ioannis Roxanis, Pablo Nenclares, Anna Wilkins, Martin McLaughlin, Adoracion Jayme-Laiche, Sarah Benafif, Georgios Nintos, Vineet Kwatra, Lorna Grove, David Mansfield, Paula Proszek, Philip Martin, Luiza Moore, Karen E. Swales, Udai Banerji, Mark P. Saunders, James Spicer, Martin D. Forster, Kevin J. Harrington
Magnus T. Dillon, Jeane Guevara, Kabir Mohammed, Emmanuel C. Patin, Simon A. Smith, Emma Dean, Gemma N. Jones, Sophie E. Willis, Marcella Petrone, Carlos Silva, Khin Thway, Catey Bunce, Ioannis Roxanis, Pablo Nenclares, Anna Wilkins, Martin McLaughlin, Adoracion Jayme-Laiche, Sarah Benafif, Georgios Nintos, Vineet Kwatra, Lorna Grove, David Mansfield, Paula Proszek, Philip Martin, Luiza Moore, Karen E. Swales, Udai Banerji, Mark P. Saunders, James Spicer, Martin D. Forster, Kevin J. Harrington
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Oncology

Durable responses to ATR inhibition with ceralasertib in tumors with genomic defects and high inflammation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Phase 1 study of ATRinhibition alone or with radiation therapy (PATRIOT) was a first-in-human phase I study of the oral ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related) inhibitor ceralasertib (AZD6738) in advanced solid tumors.METHODS The primary objective was safety. Secondary objectives included assessment of antitumor responses and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. Sixty-seven patients received 20–240 mg ceralasertib BD continuously or intermittently (14 of a 28-day cycle).RESULTS Intermittent dosing was better tolerated than continuous, which was associated with dose-limiting hematological toxicity. The recommended phase 2 dose of ceralasertib was 160 mg twice daily for 2 weeks in a 4-weekly cycle. Modulation of target and increased DNA damage were identified in tumor and surrogate PD. There were 5 (8%) confirmed partial responses (PRs) (40–240 mg BD), 34 (52%) stable disease (SD), including 1 unconfirmed PR, and 27 (41%) progressive disease. Durable responses were seen in tumors with loss of AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) and DNA damage–response defects. Treatment-modulated tumor and systemic immune markers and responding tumors were more immune inflamed than nonresponding.CONCLUSION Ceralasertib monotherapy was tolerated at 160 mg BD intermittently and associated with antitumor activity.TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02223923, EudraCT: 2013-003994-84.FUNDING Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, UK Department of Health (National Institute for Health Research), Rosetrees Trust, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre.

Authors

Magnus T. Dillon, Jeane Guevara, Kabir Mohammed, Emmanuel C. Patin, Simon A. Smith, Emma Dean, Gemma N. Jones, Sophie E. Willis, Marcella Petrone, Carlos Silva, Khin Thway, Catey Bunce, Ioannis Roxanis, Pablo Nenclares, Anna Wilkins, Martin McLaughlin, Adoracion Jayme-Laiche, Sarah Benafif, Georgios Nintos, Vineet Kwatra, Lorna Grove, David Mansfield, Paula Proszek, Philip Martin, Luiza Moore, Karen E. Swales, Udai Banerji, Mark P. Saunders, James Spicer, Martin D. Forster, Kevin J. Harrington

×

Figure 2

PKs and PDs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PKs and PDs.
(A) Change in platelet count with time, by dose cohort. Smo...
(A) Change in platelet count with time, by dose cohort. Smoothed conditional mean absolute changes compared with baseline blood count are presented, with 95% CI. (B) Ceralasertib PK. Geometric mean (and SD) plasma concentration over time after a single dose at the indicated dose levels (semi-log scale). (C) Absolute change in γH2AX-positive PBMCs (defined as percentage of cells with >5 foci) after 2-week dosing at the indicated dose levels. Line color indicates RECIST response. *P = 0.046, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test with a hypothetical median of 0. (D) Tumor PDs. Change in p-(S635)Rad50 in paired tumor biopsies after 2-week dosing. p-Rad50 in tumor cells expressed by percentage positive (left) and H score (right) for the indicated dose levels. Fold change versus baseline. P = 0.13, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. (E) Examples of staining for p-Rad50 for the indicated dose levels. Scale bars: 200 μm. Left panel: HNSCC, 40 mg BD, RECIST PR. Right panel: parotid adenocarcinoma, 160 mg BD, RECIST SD. (F) Evidence of increased replication stress with ceralasertib treatment. Immunohistochemical staining for γH2AX in paired tumor biopsies. Left: change in percentage of positive tumor cells (defined as at least 5 nuclear foci or pan-nuclar staining) after 2-week dosing. P = 0.22, paired t test. Right: examples of nuclear foci and pan-nuclear staining after treatment. Scale bar: 50 μm. (G) Examples of γH2AX staining for the indicated dose levels. Left panel: HNSCC, 40 mg BD, RECIST PR. Right panel: serous ovarian carcinoma, 160 mg BD, RECIST SD. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts