Cardiac mononuclear phagocytic cells (Cardiac MPCs) participate in maintaining homeostasis and orchestrating cardiac responses upon injury. However, the function of specific MPC subtypes and the related cell fate commitment mechanisms remain elusive in regenerative and nonregenerative hearts due to their cellular heterogeneities. Using spatiotemporal single-cell epigenomic analysis of cardiac MPCs in regenerative (P1) and nonregenerative (P10) mouse hearts after injury, we found that P1 hearts accumulate reparative Arg1+ macrophages, while proinflammatory S100a9+Ly6c+ monocytes are uniquely abundant during nonregenerative remodeling. Moreover, blocking chemokine CXCR2 to inhibit the specification of the S100a9+Ly6c+-biased inflammatory fate in P10 hearts resulted in elevated wound repair responses and marked improvements in cardiac function after injury. Single-cell RNA-Seq further confirmed an increased Arg1+ macrophage subpopulation after CXCR2 blockade, which was accomplished by increased expression of wound repair–related genes and reduced expression of proinflammatory genes. Collectively, our findings provide instructive insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the function and fate specification of heterogeneous MPCs during cardiac repair and identify potential therapeutic targets for myocardial infarction.
Mingzhu Fu, Shengtao Jia, Longhui Xu, Xin Li, Yufang Lv, Yulong Zhong, Shanshan Ai
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through October 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,738 | 0 |
1,049 | 0 | |
Figure | 100 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 190 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 47 | 0 |
Totals | 3,124 | 0 |
Total Views | 3,124 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.