Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Regulation of axonal transport
  • Disruption of axonal transport and neurodegeneration
  • Mutations in motor proteins cause neurodegeneration
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Huntington’s disease
  • Hereditary spastic paraplegia
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Inherited peripheral neuropathies
  • Axonal transport–directed therapeutics
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Review Open Access | 10.1172/JCI168554

Disruption of axonal transport in neurodegeneration

Sarah H. Berth and Thomas E. Lloyd

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Sarah H. Berth or Thomas E. Lloyd, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 855 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 248, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Email: sberth1@jhmi.edu (SHB). Email: tlloyd4@jhmi.edu (TEL).

Find articles by Berth, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Sarah H. Berth or Thomas E. Lloyd, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 855 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 248, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Email: sberth1@jhmi.edu (SHB). Email: tlloyd4@jhmi.edu (TEL).

Find articles by Lloyd, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published June 1, 2023 - More info

Published in Volume 133, Issue 11 on June 1, 2023
J Clin Invest. 2023;133(11):e168554. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168554.
© 2023 Berth et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published June 1, 2023 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Neurons are markedly compartmentalized, which makes them reliant on axonal transport to maintain their health. Axonal transport is important for anterograde delivery of newly synthesized macromolecules and organelles from the cell body to the synapse and for the retrograde delivery of signaling endosomes and autophagosomes for degradation. Dysregulation of axonal transport occurs early in neurodegenerative diseases and plays a key role in axonal degeneration. Here, we provide an overview of mechanisms for regulation of axonal transport; discuss how these mechanisms are disrupted in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, hereditary spastic paraplegia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; and discuss therapeutic approaches targeting axonal transport.

Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases are a heterogeneous group of nervous system diseases, each marked by selected populations of polarized neurons undergoing synaptic retractions, axonal degeneration, and ultimately cell death. An early and unifying event in neurodegeneration is disruption of axonal transport, a constitutive process that is necessary for maintaining neuron survival.

Neurons are highly polarized, with their longest axons reaching up to 1 meter in length in humans. This remarkable axonal length poses a substantial challenge to neurons to maintain homeostasis. Most synthesis occurs in the cell body, and macromolecules necessary for axonal and synaptic function are transported from the cell body and targeted to their correct destination. Conversely, signaling complexes from the synapse and macromolecules and organelles destined to be degraded or recycled are transported from the presynaptic terminal to the cell body. Neurons utilize the ATPase motor proteins kinesin and dynein, which recognize the intrinsic polarity of microtubules, to carry and deliver organelles along microtubule tracks (Figure 1).

Axonal transport in neurons.Figure 1

Axonal transport in neurons. Neurons are compartmentalized, with long axons. Delivery of organelles in the axon is performed via the motor proteins kinesin and dynein, which carry cargoes along microtubule tracks. Kinesin is responsible for anterograde transport of organelles, from the soma to the presynaptic terminal. Dynein is responsible for retrograde transport of organelles from the presynaptic terminal to the cell body. Dynein processivity is enhanced via binding to the essential cofactor dynactin and a cargo adaptor.

The kinesin superfamily is composed of 44 different genes and organized into 14 different subfamilies (1). Kinesin-1 (conventional kinesin) and kinesin-3 axonal transport properties have been the best characterized (2) and will be focused on in this Review. The conventional kinesin subfamily is the most studied and consists of three proteins: KIF5A, which is primarily expressed in neurons, and KIF5B and KIF5C, which are expressed ubiquitously. Kinesin is composed of two heavy chains (KHCs) and two light chains (KLCs). KHC binds microtubules and hydrolyzes ATP near the N-terminus, has a long stalk region with two coiled-coiled domains, and associates with the cargo-binding KLCs at the C-terminus (1). Within axons, kinesin exclusively transports cargoes anterogradely along microtubules from the cell body to the periphery (1).

Cytoplasmic dynein, on the other hand, transports cargoes in the retrograde direction along the axon to the cell body. Cytoplasmic dynein is a large, 1.4 MDa multimeric complex composed of dimerized heavy chains (DHCs), two intermediate chains (DICs), two light intermediate chains (DLICs), and additional light chains. DHC binds microtubules and hydrolyzes ATP at its C-terminal head, and binds cargo via interaction with other dynein subunits at its N-terminal tail (1).

Regulation of axonal transport

Axonal transport is a highly regulated process that can be modified by adaptors, by phosphorylation of motor proteins and their regulators, by posttranslational modification of microtubules, and by organelle-specific interactions. Both kinesin and dynein are autoinhibited at baseline and require activation to traffic along microtubules. Kinesin autoinhibition occurs by folding of the KHC tail to block the KHC motor from binding to microtubules (1). Dynein, on the other hand, is autoinhibited via dimerization of the motor domains, forming a structure termed the phi-particle (3). Non-dimerized dynein is in an open form that has a higher affinity for binding to microtubules but requires binding with dynactin and cargo adaptors to activate motor activity, likely by modifying the orientation of motor domains to allow processive movement along microtubules (3).

Adaptors. The best-characterized adaptor is dynactin, a cofactor for dynein-mediated axonal transport. Dynactin is a large, multi-subunit 1.1 MDa complex that interacts with dynein and microtubules and is essential for the initiation and activation of dynein-mediated transport (4–6). Other adaptors that function in concert with dynactin to activate dynein-mediated transport include bicaudal D proteins (7), the Hook protein family (8, 9), and spindly (10). Certain adaptors, such as TRAK2 (11), Hook3 (12), Jip1 (13), and HAP1 (14), can bind to both kinesin and dynein to regulate their trafficking (1).

Phosphorylation. Phosphotransferase activity regulates motor protein function (Figure 2). For example, the kinase glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) phosphorylates KHC to inhibit axonal transport and also phosphorylates KLCs to release cargoes (15, 16). Studies using perfusion of kinases and their inhibitors into squid axoplasm showed that the stress-activated protein kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3 (JNK3) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) directly phosphorylate KHCs to inhibit anterograde transport (17, 18). Additionally, perfusion of active casein kinase 2 (CK2) in the squid axoplasm reduced bidirectional axonal transport velocities (18).

Regulation of axonal transport.Figure 2

Regulation of axonal transport. Axonal transport is regulated via phosphotransferase activity. The kinases GSK3β and casein kinase 2 (CK2) inhibit anterograde axonal transport via phosphorylation of kinesin light chains, while the kinases JNK and p38 MAPK (p38) inhibit anterograde axonal transport via phosphorylation of kinesin heavy chains. GSK3β phosphorylates dynein intermediate chains to inhibit retrograde axonal transport, while CK1 phosphorylates dynein intermediate chains to activate retrograde axonal transport. Inset: Posttranslational modifications of microtubules. Microtubules are composed of α- and β-tubulin. α-Tubulin can be modified via acetylation, detyrosination, and polyglutamylation, while β-tubulin is modified by polyglutamylation.

Dynein-mediated trafficking is also regulated by phosphorylation. Several studies have indicated that the phosphorylation of DICs can alter dynein-mediated trafficking. The kinase casein kinase 1 (CK1) phosphorylates DICs to regulate dynein-dependent transport (19). Additionally, the kinase GSK3β phosphorylates DICs to reduce DIC interaction with the adaptor NDel1, which regulates dynein motility (20). Notably, phosphorylation of DIC reduced the amount of in vitro binding of dynein to dynactin, indicating that phosphorylation may regulate interaction with this important cofactor (21).

Microtubule regulation. Microtubules are cytoskeletal components shaped like hollow tubes. They are composed of α- and β-tubulin, which dimerize and then polymerize into parallel protofilaments to form a microtubule. Microtubules run the entire length of the axon and form the “tracks” along which kinesin and dynein carry cargo, with the plus end oriented toward the distal axon and the minus end oriented toward the cell body. Microtubule function is highly regulated by posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as detyrosination, polyglutamylation, and acetylation (Figure 2). This Review will focus on the latter two, as they play a role in axonal transport and have been linked to neurodegeneration.

Evidence for the role of polyglutamylation in neurodegeneration comes from Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice, which have neurodegeneration due to loss of function of cytosolic carboxypeptidase 1 (CCP1), a tubulin deglutaminase (22). Increasing microtubule polyglutamylation inhibits axonal transport (22–24).

Microtubule acetylation is another important regulator of axonal transport. Microtubules are acetylated by α-tubulin N-acetyltransferase (ATAT) and deacetylated by histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) and sirtuin-2 (SIRT2) (25). Acetylation weakens the lateral interactions between protofilaments, thought to confer flexibility and stabilization of microtubules (26–28). Reduction of ATAT1 led to a loss of microtubule acetylation and disruption of axonal transport (29, 30). On the other hand, increasing microtubule acetylation via increasing ATAT1 or preventing deacetylation by HDAC6 rescued axonal transport deficits in disease models (see below) (31, 32).

Adaptors selectively regulate organelle transport. Axonal transport regulation is tightly linked to organelle endocytosis, maturation, signaling, and degradation, indicating that axonal transport may play a role as a “hub” for integrating different cellular processes. To achieve specificity in this process, certain adaptors bind to distinct populations of cargoes, as extensively reviewed in ref. 1. For example, endolysosomal trafficking is highly regulated via specific adaptors and Rab GTPases that function as switches. For example, Rab5 controls early endosome trafficking, while Rab7 regulates late endosome maturation, motility, and fusion with lysosomes (33). Endosomal trafficking is mediated by the Hook1/dynein/dynactin complex for early endosomes, and the adaptors RILP, SKIP, and BORC for late endosomes and lysosomes (34–37).

A well-characterized population of retrogradely trafficked organelles are signaling endosomes containing neurotrophins and their receptors. Signaling endosomes are initially formed at the synapse with neurotrophin binding to receptors, and then internalized and transported to the soma for neurotrophic signaling. Signaling endosomes are specifically targeted to dynein via interactions with adaptors, including HAP1, which is important for internalization of certain neurotrophins (38); Hook1, which comigrates with signaling endosomes in the distal axon (34); and BICD1, which directs certain neurotrophins to lysosomes for degradation (39).

Lysosome transport in axons is also extensively regulated. A commonly used marker for lysosomes is LAMP1, which also labels autophagosomes and endosome pathway intermediates. A smaller percentage of LAMP1-labeled organelles in axons have acid hydrolase activity, indicating that most degradation likely occurs in or near the soma (40). Lysosomes are anterogradely transported via interactions with ARL8B and SKIP, the same adaptors that regulate anterograde transport of late endosomes, while retrograde transport is driven by the adaptors JIP3 and JIP4 (41). Autophagosome maturation and axonal trafficking are highly interlinked, as autophagosomes are generated in the distal axon and mature into autolysosomes as they are retrogradely transported (42). Autophagosome transport is regulated by the adaptors JIP1, JIP3, HTT, and HAP1 in a sequential manner as autophagosomes mature (13, 43).

Mitochondria trafficking, on the other hand, is bidirectional and is regulated via interactions between the mitochondrial outer membrane protein Miro and the motor adaptors TRAK proteins and metaxins (11, 44). Synaptic vesicle precursors are primarily trafficked anterogradely from the soma to the synapse, where they are released as mature synaptic vesicles, and are regulated via the KIF1A adaptor MADD, which activates the Rab3 GTPase on synaptic vesicles (45). Finally, dense core vesicles, which anterogradely transport neuropeptides and hormones and then undergo retrograde transport for recycling, are regulated by Arl8, Hook3, and the tyrosine phosphatase PTPN21 (45, 46).

Axonal transport and injury signaling. A key discovery in axonal degeneration research is the SARM1 pathway, an enzymatic pathway that uses sterile α and Toll/interleukin-1 receptor motif–containing protein 1 (SARM1) as a sensor of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and its upstream activator nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) to drive programmed axon degeneration via NAD degradation. A key regulator of this pathway is nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 2 (NMNAT2), which converts NMN to NAD. NMNAT2 is synthesized in the cell body and transported into the axon. In the event of an axonal injury leading to disruption of NMNAT transport, NMN levels rise while NAD levels decrease in the axon, which activates SARM1 to induce programmed axonal degeneration (47, 48). In this way, continued anterograde axonal transport of NMNAT2 promotes axonal survival.

Disruption of axonal transport and neurodegeneration

Although neurodegenerative diseases have diverse clinical phenotypes, a common link on a cellular level is the selective vulnerability of distinct populations of polarized neurons with elongated axons. In fact, across different neurodegenerative diseases, synaptic retractions and axonal degeneration are key early events compared with cell death (49–56). One major question regarding the role of axonal transport in neurodegeneration is whether disrupted axonal transport is an epiphenomenon of neurodegeneration, or whether dysregulation of axonal transport is a key initiator of disease. In fact, genetic evidence summarized below demonstrates that proper functioning of axonal transport is essential to maintain neuronal health.

Mutations in motor proteins cause neurodegeneration

Underscoring the importance of fastidious regulation of axonal transport in maintaining neuronal health is that mutations in motor proteins cause neurodegeneration. For example, mutations in the KHC gene KIF5A cause inherited neuropathies (57), hereditary spastic paraplegia (57, 58), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (59, 60). KIF5A mutations causing hereditary spastic paraplegia and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), a heterogeneous group of inherited peripheral neuropathies, are primarily missense mutations clustered in the N-terminal motor domain, whereas mutations causing ALS occur in the C-terminal cargo-binding domain, suggesting that disruption of different aspects of kinesin function underlies specificity of distinct neurodegenerative diseases (59).

Mutations in dynein have also been linked to neurodegeneration. A missense mutation in cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain 1 (DYNC1H1) is associated with an axonal form of CMT (61). Additionally, pathogenic mutations in the DCTN1 gene, encoding the major dynactin subunit p150Glued, cause neurodegeneration. A G59S mutation in DCTN1 was first discovered to cause hereditary motor neuropathy 7B (62). Additional mutations in DCTN1, mostly in the CAP-Gly domain important for binding to microtubules and initiating retrograde axonal transport (5, 6), have been identified that lead to ALS (63, 64) and Perry syndrome (65), a rare disease characterized by parkinsonism, psychiatric manifestations, central hypoventilation, and weight loss.

A common link between neurodegenerative diseases is disruption of axonal transport. Below we discuss mechanisms for axonal transport disruption in specific neurodegenerative diseases, shown in Figure 3 and summarized in Table 1. Methods commonly used to assess axonal transport are detailed in Table 2.

Dysregulation of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases.Figure 3

Dysregulation of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurodegenerative diseases disrupt axonal transport via multiple mechanisms, including motor protein regulation via phosphorylation, adaptor binding, and impaired microtubule regulation. Each neurodegenerative disease has different altered patterns of axonal transport disruption, which may contribute to disease specificity. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; HD, Huntington’s disease; HSP, hereditary spastic paraplegia; IPN, inherited peripheral neuropathy; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PS, Perry syndrome.

Table 1

Impaired axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases

Table 2

Methods to evaluate axonal transport

Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, and pathologic hallmarks in the brain include abnormal accumulation of extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated and aggregated tau. To make Aβ, the amyloid precursor protein (APP) is cleaved first by β-secretase (BACE) and then by the protein complex γ-secretase to release Aβ fragments. Presenilin-1 (PSEN1) and PSEN2 are transmembrane proteins that compose the catalytic subunits of the γ-secretase complex. Axonal transport disruption is an early event in AD. Dystrophic axons and axonal swellings, areas of expanded axons with accumulation of cargoes and motor proteins, are found in early pathologic stages of postmortem AD brains and in an AD mouse model (49). Mouse models with familial AD mutations show axonal pathology and synaptic dysfunction before Aβ plaque formation or NFT formation (50, 51), supporting the role of early axonal dysfunction in AD. Multiple mechanisms cause impaired axonal transport in AD, including altered kinase activity and organelle-specific dysregulation.

Altered kinase activity. Evidence has emerged for hyperactivity of GSK3β kinase activity in AD (66), and GSK3β phosphorylates KLCs to inhibit anterograde transport (18). In AD models, perfusion of pseudophosphorylated tau into squid axoplasm to mimic hyperphosphorylated tau activated GSK3β and impaired anterograde axonal transport, implicating a role for tau phosphorylation in modulation of axonal transport (67). In fact, it was recently shown that treating primary hippocampal neurons with Aβ oligomers led to impaired KIF1A motility independent of tau, and this could be rescued by a GSK3β inhibitor (68). This indicates that GSK3β activation through multiple AD pathways can alter axonal trafficking of both kinesin-1 and kinesin-3.

Organelle-specific dysregulation. Postmortem AD tissue and AD mouse models have a marked increase of autophagic vacuoles and immature lysosomes within dystrophic neurites (69, 70). In addition to AD-related proteins such as APP and BACE1, axonal swellings contain marked accumulations of immature lysosomes (70). Furthermore, Aβ1–42 binding to DIC, resulting in disruption of the coupling between dynein and its adaptor Snapin, has been shown to impair axonal transport of amphisomes, autophagic intermediates resulting from fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes (71). The adaptor JIP3 has also been implicated in regulating the accumulation of immature lysosomes in AD models (72). Additionally, loss of PSEN1 function impaired the acidification of amphisomes, activating JNK-mediated phosphorylation of DIC and inhibiting retrograde trafficking (73). Another proposed mechanism for lysosomal accumulation in axons in AD is impaired proteasome activity. Inhibiting proteasome activity in primary mouse neuronal cultures led to increased amyloidogenic processing of APP, thought to induce rerouting of APP into the endolysosomal pathway and disruption of lysosomal trafficking (74). Thus, different AD pathways converge on regulation of autophagolysosomal maturation and transport to specifically disrupt autophagy in axons.

Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that prominently affects the dopaminergic cells of the substantia nigra pars compacta, leading to tremors, bradykinesia, and rigidity. α-Synuclein (αSyn), a presynaptic protein that undergoes axonal transport, is misfolded and aggregated in this disease, forming Lewy bodies. Postmortem studies and animal models have shown early axonal dysfunction, loss of presynaptic termini, and loss of motor proteins (52, 53).

There is some evidence for microtubule alterations in PD. For example, LRRK2 mutations are the most common known genetic cause of PD and a risk factor for sporadic PD (31). In an overexpression model, mutant LRRK2 formed filamentous structures that interacted with deacetylated microtubules and disrupted axonal transport of mitochondria in rat cortical neurons and Drosophila (31). Restoring microtubule acetylation inhibited LRRK2 filament binding, restored axonal transport, and rescued fly locomotor deficits. However, treating primary neurons from mutant LRRK2-G2019S knockin mice with a kinase inhibitor to increase LRRK2 microtubule binding did not disrupt microtubule dynamics or axonal transport, suggesting that these filamentous structures may not alter axonal transport at endogenous levels (75).

αSyn has been shown to colocalize with microtubules both in vitro and in vivo (76, 77). In fact, αSyn promotes the formation of short microtubules, which are associated with anterograde transport of dynein. PD-associated αSyn prevented this generation of short microtubules, indicating altered direct interactions with microtubules (76). Mutant αSyn also led to a reduction of acetylated tubulin and of Kif5 within neurites (78), showing an effect on tubulin PTM as well.

Organelle-specific dysregulation. Loss-of-function mutations in Parkin and PINK1 have been identified as causing familial PD (79, 80). PINK1 and Parkin both regulate mitophagy, the autophagic degradation of mitochondria. PINK1, a serine-threonine kinase, accumulates on damaged mitochondria, and in order to regulate mitophagy, PINK1 mRNA is cotransported with mitochondria along axons for local translation in response to mitochondrial damage (81). Parkin is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is recruited to mitochondria and phosphorylated by PINK1. Upon activation, Parkin ubiquitinates mitochondrial outer membrane proteins to focally remove damaged components, promote biogenesis, or, in more severe cases of mitochondrial damage, recruit adaptor proteins for mitophagy (82). In vitro studies have shown that Parkin-dependent mitophagy occurs locally in distal neuronal axons (83). Moreover, PINK1 phosphorylates Miro, a regulator of mitochondria axonal transport, to activate Parkin-dependent degradation and release mitochondria from kinesin, leading to reduced axonal transport of mitochondria (84, 85). LRRK2 gain-of-function mutations, on the other hand, lead to an increased phosphorylation of Rab10 on depolarized mitochondria, disrupting mitophagy (86). Additionally, loss-of-function mutations of PINK or Parkin, or a gain-of-function mutation of LRRK2, led to resistance of the Miro1 isoform to proteasomal degradation and delayed mitophagy (87), implicating impaired mitophagy as a unifying mechanism for these PD-causing mutations. While mitophagy has been difficult to assess within in vivo mature neurons, techniques such as electron microscopy and the development of mitophagy reporter mice have aided evaluation of in vivo mitophagy in neurons (88). For example, mitophagy reporter mice expressing the LRRK-G2019S mutation have impaired basal mitophagy in dopaminergic tissues (89).

Additionally, trafficking of autophagosomes and endosomes is disrupted in PD models. For example, treatment of primary neurons with preformed αSyn fibrils caused an axonal accumulation of αSyn fibrils, which specifically impaired axonal transport of endosomes and autophagosomes (90). Further, expression of mutant LRRK2 in primary neurons reduced retrograde autophagic vesicle trafficking and impaired autophagosome maturation via recruitment of the kinesin adaptor JIP4 to increase kinesin association with autophagosomes to alter coordination of axonal trafficking (75). Intriguingly, while autophagosomes and endosomes are usually retrogradely transported in separate populations, pathogenic αSyn increased the overlap between these populations, indicating that PD may impair sorting of endosomes and autophagosomes as they undergo axonal trafficking (91).

Huntington’s disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by CAG repeat expansions in the huntingtin gene (HTT), leading to degeneration initially in the striatum that spreads to cortical areas in the brain. Signs of HD include hyperkinetic movements such as chorea, abnormal saccades, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive decline. HD is thought to be caused by gain-of-function and dominant-negative effects of mutant Htt, in addition to loss of wild-type Htt function (92). Axonal dysfunction and loss of axons occur early in HD before symptom onset (54, 55). Htt acts as a scaffold for axonal transport and plays critical roles in synaptic transmission and autophagy. Mutant Htt disrupts axonal transport in multiple experimental models (93–95).

Underscoring the importance of adaptors for proper regulation for axonal transport is the finding that Htt itself acts as an adaptor for axonal transport by binding to DIC to facilitate dynein-mediated transport (96). In fact, Htt has been implicated in axonal transport of a broad range of vesicles (43, 97–105) and has been suggested to promote axonal transport (94, 103, 106). Htt interacts with another adaptor, huntingtin-associated protein 1 (HAP1), which interacts with the p150Glued subunit of dynactin, DLIC, KIF5C, and KLC to regulate axonal transport (1, 14). Mutant Htt disrupts function of the Htt/HAP1 complex (106) to impair axonal transport (94, 103, 106).

Additionally, Htt is regulated via PTMs, and altered PTM regulation of mutant Htt may play an important role in HD pathogenesis. Htt is phosphorylated by the kinase Akt at S421 to promote anterograde trafficking of APP, and this Akt/Htt pathway has been shown to be downregulated in HD brains (107). Furthermore, Htt is dimethylated by protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) to facilitate axonal transport, and S-adenosylhomocysteine, which regulates PRMT6, is downregulated in HD models. Overexpressing PRMT6 in mutant Htt cell culture and fly models was able to rescue phenotypes, indicating that decreased dimethylation of mutant Htt may alter Htt’s regulation of axonal transport in HD (108).

Hereditary spastic paraplegia

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a group of inherited diseases with progressive spasticity in the legs due to axonal degeneration of upper motor neurons and dorsal columns (109). Mutations in over 73 genes have been described that cause HSP (110). These genes have been implicated in multiple pathways, including axonal transport, metabolic pathways, ER dynamics, vesicle formation, myelination, and autophagy (110). In fact, close to 10% of patients with HSP have KIF5A mutations, most of which are in the motor domains, leading to reduced kinesin motility (58, 111, 112). Other HSP-causing mutations, including mutations in SPAST (which encodes spastin), SPG11 (encoding spatacsin), and ZYFE26 (encoding spastizin), also impair axonal transport, showing that this is likely a common mechanism for HSP (113–116).

The most common autosomal dominant cause of HSP is mutations in SPAST, encoding spastin, an AAA ATPase that severs polyglutamylated microtubules, forming shorter microtubule fragments (117). Depletion of SPAST led to longer microtubules, increased polyglutamylation, and reduction of kinesin-mediated axonal transport (118). SPAST mutations also reduced tubulin acetylation in patient-derived stem cell models (119). In fact, mutant spastin models showed impaired axonal transport of multiple organelles (113, 120–122), indicating that spastin-mediated severing of microtubules likely affects axonal transport function. Further, loss of spastin caused reduced microtubule dynamics and density, underscoring its importance in axonal transport (123–125).

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of upper and lower motor neurons, leading to progressive weakness, spasticity, and hyperreflexia. Early pathologic studies of postmortem tissue showed axonal swellings and neurofilament accumulation, consistent with axonal transport defects (56). While close to 90% of ALS is sporadic, mutations in over 25 genes cause familial ALS. Underscoring impaired axonal transport as a pathogenic mechanism is that mutations in genes encoding multiple motor proteins, including the kinesin gene KIF5A, the dynactin gene DCTN1, and the dynein gene DYNC1H1, cause ALS (59, 63, 64, 126, 127). Axonal transport defects have been further identified across multiple models of genetic forms of ALS (128). For example, axonal transport is perturbed by mutations in SOD1 (encoding superoxide dismutase 1) that cause ALS (129–131). Likewise, ALS-causing mutations of FUS and TDP-43 also alter axonal transport (132–134). Potential mechanisms for these impairments are discussed below.

Altered kinase activity regulating axonal transport. Mutant FUS, mutant SOD1, and oxidized SOD1 inhibited axonal transport in squid axoplasm via activation of the stress-activated protein kinase p38 MAPK, which phosphorylated KHCs to release kinesin from microtubules (135–137). Impairment of axonal transport was rescued by inhibition of p38 MAPK in squid axoplasm, primary neurons, and mouse models of SOD1-mutant ALS (135, 136, 138).

A CRISPR/Cas9 screen identified NEK6, a kinase known to regulate the microtubule-based mitotic spindle, as a mediator of poly-proline-arginine toxicity (139). Depletion of NEK6 was sufficient to rescue axonal transport deficits in cortical neurons derived from C9orf72 patient induced pluripotent stem cells (139). Knocking down NEK6 altered phosphorylation of multiple proteins associated with axonal transport, indicating that NEK6 activity modulates axonal transport via phosphorylation of axonal transport regulators (139).

Organelle-specific dysregulation. ALS mutations have varied effects on vesicle trafficking. First, mitochondria transport was impaired in mutant SOD1 models of ALS (140). SOD1 mutations led to a reduction of Miro levels; overexpression of Miro1 was able to rescue impaired axonal transport in mutant SOD1 cortical and motor neurons (141). Disrupted mitochondrial trafficking as a pathogenic mechanism has also been proposed for ALS caused by a GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) in the C9orf72 gene, which is the most common genetic cause of ALS. A pathogenic mechanism for C9orf72 ALS is via repeat-associated non-AUG translation of the HRE transcripts, creating aggregation-prone and neurotoxic dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins, including poly-glycine-arginine (poly-GR) and poly-proline-arginine (poly-PR). Although mitochondrial trafficking was not altered in motor nerves in a third-instar larva Drosophila model of C9orf72 ALS (142), another recent study found reduced mitochondrial trafficking in aged, induced pluripotent stem cell–derived (iPS-derived) motor neurons and adult Drosophila neurons (143). Single-molecule tracking showed that poly-GR and poly-PR DPRs associated with the C-terminal tubulin tails of microtubules and caused motor pausing or detachment to reduce axonal transport (143). It is plausible that disrupted mitochondrial trafficking may be an age-related phenomenon in C9orf72 ALS.

Intriguingly, even at a young age, in vivo motor neurons in Drosophila had markedly impaired autophagosome biogenesis, late endosome trafficking, and an accumulation of static lysosomes, indicating that early disruption in the axonal autophagolysosomal pathway may be a key pathogenic event in C9orf72 ALS (142, 144). While there is more evidence for a toxic gain of function by C9orf72 HRE, loss of function of C9orf72 due to the HRE may also contribute to pathogenesis. Indeed, C9orf72 localizes with Rab5-positive early endosomes, and loss of function of C9orf72 disrupted early endosomal maturation and trafficking in iPS motor neurons (145). Other evidence for certain ALS mutations having specific effects on axonal transport is in vivo analysis showing impaired axonal transport of signaling endosomes specifically in mutant TDP-43 mice but not mutant FUS mice (146). Finally, there has been growing interest in how axonal transport of mRNA, which is important for local translation in axons, is impaired in ALS. In fact, TDP-43 is cotransported with messenger ribonucleoprotein granules (comprising nontranslating mRNA and bound proteins), indicating that TDP-43 may regulate this process (147). Disruption of mRNA axonal transport has been associated with annexin A11 (ANXA11) mutations causing ALS (148). ANXA11 tethers RNA granules to trafficking lysosomes; ALS-causing ANXA11 mutations disrupted these interactions to reduce ANXA11 binding to RNA granules and to lysosomes (149).

Inherited peripheral neuropathies

Inherited peripheral neuropathies are characterized by progressive degeneration of the peripheral nerves. CMT, one of the most common inherited neurologic diseases, is a heterogeneous group of peripheral neuropathies with progressive distal weakness, numbness, and atrophy. Over 100 causative genetic mutations have been discovered thus far (150), including mutations in DCTN1, implicating impaired axonal transport as an underlying mechanism (62). Other genetic mutations impair axonal transport via alterations in microtubules and their PTMs, as well as via disruption of axonal trafficking of specific organelles.

Mutations in the TUBB3 gene, which encodes β-tubulin isotype III, cause a hereditary axonal polyneuropathy; mouse models of disease-causing TUBB3 mutations had impaired microtubule dynamics with an increase of microtubule polyglutamylation and acetylation (151). Additionally, certain mutations in HSPB1 cause CMT2F and distal hereditary motor neuropathy (152). These mutations had an increased binding to tubulin and microtubules, leading to altered microtubule dynamics via stabilization of microtubules (153). HSPB1 also impairs microtubule acetylation and axonal transport; inhibiting HDAC6 to increase microtubule acetylation improved axonal transport deficits (154, 155). Further, a CMT-linked dominant mutation of GARS led to aberrant interactions between glycyl-tRNA synthetase and HDAC6, leading to a decrease in microtubule acetylation; treating with an HDAC6 inhibitor restored this deficit (156).

Organelle-specific dysregulation. Several CMT-causing mutations impair axonal transport of mitochondria. Mitofusin 2 (MFN2) is a mitochondrial outer membrane protein important for mitochondrial fusion, and CMT-causing mutations in MFN2, which encodes MFN2, are the most common cause of axonal CMT (157). These mutations induce impaired axonal transport of mitochondria, likely through direct interactions with Miro, a mitochondrial protein that regulates attachment of mitochondria to the motor proteins in a calcium-dependent manner (158–160). Additionally, CMT-causing mutations in the cation channel transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) led to an increase in intracellular calcium and impaired mitochondrial trafficking via dysregulation of Miro (161, 162). Further, expression of mutant HSPB1 in primary motor neurons induced mitochondrial abnormalities and disrupted axonal trafficking of mitochondria to a greater extent than other organelles (163). Another CMT-linked gene that has been related to impaired mitochondrial trafficking is GAN, encoding gigaxonin, an E3 ligase adaptor that regulates intermediate filaments. Intermediate filament aggregation caused by mutant GAN led to impaired mitochondrial motility, possibly due to impaired intermediate filament regulation of mitochondrial distribution (164, 165). Additionally, CMT-causing mutations in the NEFL gene (encoding neurofilament light chain) led to impaired trafficking of both neurofilament light chains and mitochondria (159, 166–168). Finally, again showing the important link between endosomal maturation and axonal transport are CMT-causing mutations in RAB7, which encodes the Rab7 GTPase on late endosomes that regulates trafficking. These CMT-causing Rab7 mutations caused impaired axonal transport of endosomes; biochemical assays revealed that these disease-causing mutations led to excess activation and misregulation of Rab7 activity (169–171).

Axonal transport–directed therapeutics

Attention has been turned to targeting aberrant kinase activity to treat neurodegeneration. Of the kinase inhibitors shown to modify axonal transport discussed above, clinical trials to evaluate GSK3β and p38 MAPK in neurodegeneration have been initiated. Two GSK3β inhibitors have been used in clinical trials for AD. A pilot study of Tideglusib treatment in AD showed a positive trend in cognition without significance (172), but a phase II clinical trial in AD did not show clinical benefit (173). A phase I clinical trial of the GSK3β inhibitor AZD1080 showed target engagement, but no further clinical trials evaluating AZD1080 in neurodegenerative disease have been published (174). p38 MAPK inhibitors have also been targeted as treatment for neurodegenerative disease. A phase IIa study of the p38 MAPKα inhibitor neflamapimod in patients with early AD showed a significant improvement in episodic memory (175). However, a subsequent phase II trial with 24-week treatment with neflamapimod (REVERSE-SD) did not replicate these results (176).

HDAC6 inhibitors have also been considered as a therapeutic target to increase microtubule acetylation and promote axonal transport. Thus far, there have been conflicting reports regarding the extent of microtubule acetylation defects in neurodegeneration. For example, in AD, there have been reports of either increased or decreased α-tubulin acetylation (177, 178). Additionally, while it has been shown that tubulin acetylation is decreased in HD, correcting this defect in a mouse model did not alter disease progression (179). However, HDAC6 inhibitors to increase microtubule acetylation have been shown to rescue phenotypes across models of multiple neurodegenerative diseases with impaired axonal transport, such as AD, PD, HD, ALS, and CMT (31, 132, 154, 156, 180–188). Note that besides α-tubulin, HDAC6 has other cytosolic targets, including tau, heat shock protein 90, cortactin, peroxiredoxin, and heat shock transcription factor-1, and the development of inhibitors to solely affect microtubule acetylation in the future will allow for greater specificity (180, 189). The HDAC6 inhibitor vorinostat is currently in a phase Ib study for patients with AD (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03056495), and the HDAC6 inhibitor nicotinamide is currently in a phase II trial for AD (NCT03061474).

Conclusions

While axonal transport is clearly disrupted in neurodegeneration, major questions still remain. One is whether disruption of axonal transport is an epiphenomenon in the setting of diseased neurons, as opposed to a key pathogenic event. There is stronger evidence for disrupted axonal transport as a key pathogenic event in peripheral neuropathies and motor neuron diseases, as genetic mutations in motor proteins themselves cause these diseases. It is difficult to exclude the possibility that these mutations may exert deleterious effects outside of axons, for example on organelle trafficking in the soma or dendrites. However, peripheral nervous system neurons have the longest axons in the body, and are thus particularly reliant on axonal transport for homeostasis. Supporting this hypothesis is that disruption of axonal trafficking via certain chemotherapeutic drugs such as paclitaxel causes peripheral neuropathies, demonstrating the importance of proper functioning of axonal transport in preventing neurodegeneration.

Axonal transport regulation is complex and regulated through multiple synergistic mechanisms, and alterations in axonal transport in specific diseases are likely due to different patterns of dysregulation of specific components including motor proteins, microtubules, and cargoes. As axonal transport declines with age, it is plausible that initially neurons are able to compensate for defects in axonal transport. However, as axonal transport declines and more targets are dysregulated, neurons become unable to compensate for these defects, leading to axonal degeneration. Thus, targeting therapies at early stages of axonal transport disruption would be important to prevent the subsequent pathogenic cascade in neurodegeneration.

Additionally, while axonal transport has clearly been shown to be disrupted in neurodegeneration, other cellular functions such as autophagy and nucleocytoplasmic transport are also impaired in neurodegeneration. Evidence continues to emerge that these distinct cellular processes are extensively interconnected. In fact, axonal transport likely acts as a signaling hub to coordinate organelle maturation and trafficking to affect diverse cellular processes, giving credence to the importance of axonal transport to maintain homeostasis in the axon. It is plausible that treatment of neurodegeneration will require a multimodal approach, targeting different aspects of cellular function to protect neurons. Directing therapeutics at axonal transport may be crucial to stabilize axonal function in conjunction with other disease-modifying therapies. Thus far, clinical trials using kinase inhibitors and HDAC6 inhibitors to treat neurodegeneration have begun, although their treatment efficacy remains to be determined. Continued, detailed assessments of precise mechanisms underlying axonal transport deficits will be beneficial for further development of therapeutic targets.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; K08NS118123) and from Merkin Peripheral Neuropathy and Nerve Regeneration Center (22-DF/CI/229) to SHB and by grants from the NINDS (R01NS082563, R01NS094239, P30NS050274) and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (17-IIP-370) to TEL.

Address correspondence to: Sarah H. Berth or Thomas E. Lloyd, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 855 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 248, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Email: sberth1@jhmi.edu (SHB). Email: tlloyd4@jhmi.edu (TEL).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2023, Berth et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(11):e168554. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168554.

References
  1. Cason SE, Holzbaur ELF. Selective motor activation in organelle transport along axons. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(11):699–714.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Nabb AT, et al. Smart motors and cargo steering drive kinesin-mediated selective transport. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2020;103:103464.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Zhang K, et al. Cryo-EM reveals how human cytoplasmic dynein is auto-inhibited and activated. Cell. 2017;169(7):1303–1314.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. McKenney RJ, et al. Activation of cytoplasmic dynein motility by dynactin-cargo adapter complexes. Science. 2014;345(6194):337–341.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Lloyd TE, et al. The p150(Glued) CAP-Gly domain regulates initiation of retrograde transport at synaptic termini. Neuron. 2012;74(2):344–360.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Moughamian AJ, Holzbaur EL. Dynactin is required for transport initiation from the distal axon. Neuron. 2012;74(2):331–343.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A. Bicaudal D family of motor adaptors: linking dynein motility to cargo binding. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26(5):327–340.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Lee IG, et al. A conserved interaction of the dynein light intermediate chain with dynein-dynactin effectors necessary for processivity. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):986.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Urnavicius L, et al. Cryo-EM shows how dynactin recruits two dyneins for faster movement. Nature. 2018;554(7691):202–206.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Griffis ER, et al. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 2007;177(6):1005–1015.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Fenton AR, et al. Mitochondrial adaptor TRAK2 activates and functionally links opposing kinesin and dynein motors. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4578.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Kendrick AA, et al. Hook3 is a scaffold for the opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors cytoplasmic dynein-1 and KIF1C. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(9):2982–3001.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Fu MM, et al. LC3 binding to the scaffolding protein JIP1 regulates processive dynein-driven transport of autophagosomes. Dev Cell. 2014;29(5):577–590.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Twelvetrees AE, et al. The adaptor proteins HAP1a and GRIP1 collaborate to activate the kinesin-1 isoform KIF5C. J Cell Sci. 2019;132(24):jcs215822.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Du J, et al. A kinesin signaling complex mediates the ability of GSK-3beta to affect mood-associated behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(25):11573–11578.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Banerjee R, et al. A stop or go switch: glycogen synthase kinase 3β phosphorylation of the kinesin 1 motor domain at Ser314 halts motility without detaching from microtubules. Development. 2021;148(24):dev199866.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Padzik A, et al. KIF5C S176 phosphorylation regulates microtubule binding and transport efficiency in mammalian neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:57.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Brady ST, Morfini GA. Regulation of motor proteins, axonal transport deficits and adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;105:273–282.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Ikeda K, et al. CK1 activates minus-end-directed transport of membrane organelles along microtubules. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(8):1321–1329.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Gao FJ, et al. GSK-3β phosphorylation of cytoplasmic dynein reduces Ndel1 binding to intermediate chains and alters dynein motility. Traffic. 2015;16(9):941–961.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Vaughan PS, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain phosphorylation regulates binding to dynactin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(28):26171–26179.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Bodakuntla S, et al. Tubulin polyglutamylation is a general traffic-control mechanism in hippocampal neurons. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(3):jcs241802.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Gilmore-Hall S, et al. CCP1 promotes mitochondrial fusion and motility to prevent Purkinje cell neuron loss in pcd mice. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(1):206–219.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Magiera MM, et al. Excessive tubulin polyglutamylation causes neurodegeneration and perturbs neuronal transport. EMBO J. 2018;37(23):e100440.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Janke C, Montagnac G. Causes and consequences of microtubule acetylation. Curr Biol. 2017;27(23):R1287–R1292.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Xu Z, et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science. 2017;356(6335):328–332.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Portran D, et al. Tubulin acetylation protects long-lived microtubules against mechanical ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(4):391–398.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Eshun-Wilson L, et al. Effects of α-tubulin acetylation on microtubule structure and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(21):10366–10371.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Even A, et al. ATAT1-enriched vesicles promote microtubule acetylation via axonal transport. Sci Adv. 2019;5(12):eaax2705.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Neumann B, Hilliard MA. Loss of MEC-17 leads to microtubule instability and axonal degeneration. Cell Rep. 2014;6(1):93–103.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Godena VK, et al. Increasing microtubule acetylation rescues axonal transport and locomotor deficits caused by LRRK2 Roc-COR domain mutations. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5245.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Morelli G, et al. p27Kip1 modulates axonal transport by regulating α-tubulin acetyltransferase 1 stability. Cell Rep. 2018;23(8):2429–2442.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Pfeffer SR. Rab GTPases: master regulators that establish the secretory and endocytic pathways. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(6):712–715.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Olenick MA, et al. Dynein activator Hook1 is required for trafficking of BDNF-signaling endosomes in neurons. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(1):220–233.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Villari G, et al. Distinct retrograde microtubule motor sets drive early and late endosome transport. EMBO J. 2020;39(24):e103661.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Jongsma ML, et al. SKIP-HOPS recruits TBC1D15 for a Rab7-to-Arl8b identity switch to control late endosome transport. EMBO J. 2020;39(6):e102301.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Farias GG, et al. BORC/kinesin-1 ensemble drives polarized transport of lysosomes into the axon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(14):E2955–E2964.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Lim Y, et al. HAP1 is required for endocytosis and signalling of BDNF and its receptors in neurons. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(3):1815–1830.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Budzinska MI, et al. PTPN23 binds the dynein adaptor BICD1 and is required for endocytic sorting of neurotrophin receptors. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(6):jcs242412.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Cheng XT, et al. Characterization of LAMP1-labeled nondegradative lysosomal and endocytic compartments in neurons. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(9):3127–3139.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Gowrishankar S, et al. Overlapping roles of JIP3 and JIP4 in promoting axonal transport of lysosomes in human iPSC-derived neurons. Mol Biol Cell. 2021;32(11):1094–1103.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Maday S, Holzbaur EL. Compartment-specific regulation of autophagy in primary neurons. J Neurosci. 2016;36(22):5933–5945.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Cason SE, et al. Sequential dynein effectors regulate axonal autophagosome motility in a maturation-dependent pathway. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(7):e202010179.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Zhao Y, et al. Metaxins are core components of mitochondrial transport adaptor complexes. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):83.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Hummel JJA, Hoogenraad CC. Specific KIF1A-adaptor interactions control selective cargo recognition. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(10):e202105011.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Siddiqui N, et al. PTPN21 and Hook3 relieve KIF1C autoinhibition and activate intracellular transport. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2693.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Coleman MP, Hoke A. Programmed axon degeneration: from mouse to mechanism to medicine. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21(4):183–196.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Milde S, et al. Subcellular localization determines the stability and axon protective capacity of axon survival factor Nmnat2. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(4):e1001539.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Stokin GB, et al. Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2005;307(5713):1282–1288.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Cai Y, et al. BACE1 elevation is involved in amyloid plaque development in the triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease: differential Abeta antibody labeling of early-onset axon terminal pathology. Neurotox Res. 2012;21(2):160–174.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Gilley J, et al. Age-dependent axonal transport and locomotor changes and tau hypophosphorylation in a “P301L” tau knockin mouse. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(3):621.e1–621.e15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Kordower JH, et al. Disease duration and the integrity of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2013;136(pt 8):2419–2431.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Chu Y, et al. Alterations in axonal transport motor proteins in sporadic and experimental Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2012;135(pt 7):2058–2073.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Ciarmiello A, et al. Brain white-matter volume loss and glucose hypometabolism precede the clinical symptoms of Huntington’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(2):215–222.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Gatto RG, et al. Analysis of YFP(J16)-R6/2 reporter mice and postmortem brains reveals early pathology and increased vulnerability of callosal axons in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(18):5285–5298.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Hirano A, et al. Fine structural observations of neurofilamentous changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1984;43(5):461–470.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Lopez E, et al. Identification of two novel KIF5A mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia associated with mild peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Sci. 2015;358(1–2):422–427.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Reid E, et al. A kinesin heavy chain (KIF5A) mutation in hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG10). Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(5):1189–1194.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Nicolas A, et al. Genome-wide analyses identify KIF5A as a novel ALS gene. Neuron. 2018;97(6):1268–1283.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Brenner D, et al. Hot-spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain. 2018;141(3):688–697.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Weedon MN, et al. Exome sequencing identifies a DYNC1H1 mutation in a large pedigree with dominant axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89(2):308–312.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Puls I, et al. Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nat Genet. 2003;33(4):455–456.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Munch C, et al. Point mutations of the p150 subunit of dynactin (DCTN1) gene in ALS. Neurology. 2004;63(4):724–726.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Cady J, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset is influenced by the burden of rare variants in known amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(1):100–113.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Konno T, et al. DCTN1-related neurodegeneration: Perry syndrome and beyond. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;41:14–24.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Lauretti E, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020;1867(5):118664.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Morris SL, et al. Defined tau phosphospecies differentially inhibit fast axonal transport through activation of two independent signaling pathways. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:610037.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Gan KJ, et al. GSK3β impairs KIF1A transport in a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease but does not regulate motor motility at S402. eNeuro. 2020;7(6):ENEURO.0176-20.2020.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Nixon RA, et al. Extensive involvement of autophagy in Alzheimer disease: an immuno-electron microscopy study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005;64(2):113–122.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Gowrishankar S, et al. Massive accumulation of luminal protease-deficient axonal lysosomes at Alzheimer’s disease amyloid plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(28):E3699–E3708.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Tammineni P, et al. Impaired retrograde transport of axonal autophagosomes contributes to autophagic stress in Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Elife. 2017;6:e21776.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Gowrishankar S, et al. Impaired JIP3-dependent axonal lysosome transport promotes amyloid plaque pathology. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(10):3291–3305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Lie PPY, et al. Axonal transport of late endosomes and amphisomes is selectively modulated by local Ca2+ efflux and disrupted by PSEN1 loss of function. Sci Adv. 2022;8(17):eabj5716.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Otero MG, et al. Proteasome stress leads to APP axonal transport defects by promoting its amyloidogenic processing in lysosomes. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(11):jcs214536.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Boecker CA, et al. Increased LRRK2 kinase activity alters neuronal autophagy by disrupting the axonal transport of autophagosomes. Curr Biol. 2021;31(10):2140–2154.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Toba S, et al. Alpha-synuclein facilitates to form short unconventional microtubules that have a unique function in the axonal transport. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16386.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Amadeo A, et al. The association between α-synuclein and α-tubulin in brain synapses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Prots I, et al. α-Synuclein oligomers impair neuronal microtubule-kinesin interplay. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(30):21742–21754.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Lucking CB, et al. Association between early-onset Parkinson’s disease and mutations in the parkin gene. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(21):1560–1567.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Valente EM, et al. Hereditary early-onset Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in PINK1. Science. 2004;304(5674):1158–1160.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Harbauer AB, et al. Neuronal mitochondria transport Pink1 mRNA via synaptojanin 2 to support local mitophagy. Neuron. 2022;110(9):1516–1531.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Ge P, et al. PINK1 and Parkin mitochondrial quality control: a source of regional vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):20.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Ashrafi G, et al. Mitophagy of damaged mitochondria occurs locally in distal neuronal axons and requires PINK1 and Parkin. J Cell Biol. 2014;206(5):655–670.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Wang X, et al. PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell. 2011;147(4):893–906.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Shlevkov E, et al. Miro phosphorylation sites regulate Parkin recruitment and mitochondrial motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(41):E6097–E6106.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Wauters F, et al. LRRK2 mutations impair depolarization-induced mitophagy through inhibition of mitochondrial accumulation of RAB10. Autophagy. 2020;16(2):203–222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Hsieh CH, et al. Functional impairment in Miro degradation and mitophagy is a shared feature in familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(6):709–724.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Cummins N, Gotz J. Shedding light on mitophagy in neurons: what is the evidence for PINK1/Parkin mitophagy in vivo? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(7):1151–1162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Singh F, et al. Pharmacological rescue of impaired mitophagy in Parkinson’s disease-related LRRK2 G2019S knock-in mice. Elife. 2021;10:e67604.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Volpicelli-Daley LA, et al. Formation of α-synuclein Lewy neurite-like aggregates in axons impedes the transport of distinct endosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25(25):4010–4023.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Kulkarni VV, et al. Retrograde axonal autophagy and endocytic pathways are parallel and separate in neurons. J Neurosci. 2022;42(45):8524–8541.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Vitet H, et al. Traffic signaling: new functions of huntingtin and axonal transport in neurological disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020;63:122–130.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Szebenyi G, et al. Neuropathogenic forms of huntingtin and androgen receptor inhibit fast axonal transport. Neuron. 2003;40(1):41–52.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Gunawardena S, et al. Disruption of axonal transport by loss of huntingtin or expression of pathogenic polyQ proteins in Drosophila. Neuron. 2003;40(1):25–40.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Lee WC, et al. Cytoplasmic aggregates trap polyglutamine-containing proteins and block axonal transport in a Drosophila model of Huntington’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(9):3224–3229.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Caviston JP, et al. Huntingtin facilitates dynein/dynactin-mediated vesicle transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(24):10045–10050.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Colin E, et al. Huntingtin phosphorylation acts as a molecular switch for anterograde/retrograde transport in neurons. EMBO J. 2008;27(15):2124–2134.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. Her LS, Goldstein LS. Enhanced sensitivity of striatal neurons to axonal transport defects induced by mutant huntingtin. J Neurosci. 2008;28(50):13662–13672.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. White JA, et al. Excess Rab4 rescues synaptic and behavioral dysfunction caused by defective HTT-Rab4 axonal transport in Huntington’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8(1):97.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  100. Twelvetrees AE, et al. Delivery of GABAARs to synapses is mediated by HAP1-KIF5 and disrupted by mutant huntingtin. Neuron. 2010;65(1):53–65.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. The regulation of autophagosome dynamics by huntingtin and HAP1 is disrupted by expression of mutant huntingtin, leading to defective cargo degradation. J Neurosci. 2014;34(4):1293–1305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. Caviston JP, et al. Huntingtin coordinates the dynein-mediated dynamic positioning of endosomes and lysosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(4):478–492.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  103. Zala D, et al. Huntingtin’s function in axonal transport is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  104. Savas JN, et al. A role for Huntington disease protein in dendritic RNA granules. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(17):13142–13153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  105. Reddy PH, Shirendeb UP. Mutant huntingtin, abnormal mitochondrial dynamics, defective axonal transport of mitochondria, and selective synaptic degeneration in Huntington’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(2):101–110.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Gauthier LR, et al. Huntingtin controls neurotrophic support and survival of neurons by enhancing BDNF vesicular transport along microtubules. Cell. 2004;118(1):127–138.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. Bruyere J, et al. Presynaptic APP levels and synaptic homeostasis are regulated by Akt phosphorylation of huntingtin. Elife. 2020;9:e56371.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  108. Migazzi A, et al. Huntingtin-mediated axonal transport requires arginine methylation by PRMT6. Cell Rep. 2021;35(2):108980.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  109. Deluca GC, et al. The extent of axonal loss in the long tracts in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2004;30(6):576–584.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  110. Panza E, et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: genetic heterogeneity and common pathways. Exp Neurol. 2022;357:114203.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  111. Schule R, et al. SPG10 is a rare cause of spastic paraplegia in European families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(5):584–587.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  112. Jennings S, et al. Characterization of kinesin switch I mutations that cause hereditary spastic paraplegia. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180353.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  113. Kasher PR, et al. Direct evidence for axonal transport defects in a novel mouse model of mutant spastin-induced hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and human HSP patients. J Neurochem. 2009;110(1):34–44.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  114. Tarrade A, et al. A mutation of spastin is responsible for swellings and impairment of transport in a region of axon characterized by changes in microtubule composition. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(24):3544–3558.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  115. Denton KR, et al. Loss of spastin function results in disease-specific axonal defects in human pluripotent stem cell-based models of hereditary spastic paraplegia. Stem Cells. 2014;32(2):414–423.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  116. Perez-Branguli F, et al. Dysfunction of spatacsin leads to axonal pathology in SPG11-linked hereditary spastic paraplegia. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(18):4859–4874.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  117. Valenstein ML, Roll-Mecak A. Graded control of microtubule severing by tubulin glutamylation. Cell. 2016;164(5):911–921.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  118. Lopes AT, et al. Spastin depletion increases tubulin polyglutamylation and impairs kinesin-mediated neuronal transport, leading to working and associative memory deficits. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(8):e3000820.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  119. Abrahamsen G, et al. A patient-derived stem cell model of hereditary spastic paraplegia with SPAST mutations. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(2):489–502.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  120. Fuerst JC, et al. Distinct intracellular vesicle transport mechanisms are selectively modified by spastin and spastin mutations. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(2):362–368.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  121. Plaud C, et al. Spastin regulates VAMP7-containing vesicles trafficking in cortical neurons. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(6):1666–1677.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  122. Wali G, et al. Oxidative stress-induced axon fragmentation is a consequence of reduced axonal transport in hereditary spastic paraplegia SPAST patient neurons. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:401.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  123. Sherwood NT, et al. Drosophila spastin regulates synaptic microtubule networks and is required for normal motor function. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(12):e429.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  124. Trotta N, et al. The hereditary spastic paraplegia gene, spastin, regulates microtubule stability to modulate synaptic structure and function. Curr Biol. 2004;14(13):1135–1147.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  125. Yogev S, et al. Microtubule organization determines axonal transport dynamics. Neuron. 2016;92(2):449–460.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  126. Baron DM, et al. ALS-associated KIF5A mutations abolish autoinhibition resulting in a toxic gain of function. Cell Rep. 2022;39(1):110598.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  127. Mentis AA, et al. A novel variant in DYNC1H1 could contribute to human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia spectrum. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2022;8(2):a006096.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  128. Baldwin KR, et al. Axonal transport defects are a common phenotype in Drosophila models of ALS. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(12):2378–2392.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  129. Bilsland LG, et al. Deficits in axonal transport precede ALS symptoms in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(47):20523–20528.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  130. Kieran D, et al. A mutation in dynein rescues axonal transport defects and extends the life span of ALS mice. J Cell Biol. 2005;169(4):561–567.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  131. Pun S, et al. Selective vulnerability and pruning of phasic motoneuron axons in motoneuron disease alleviated by CNTF. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(3):408–419.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  132. Guo W, et al. HDAC6 inhibition reverses axonal transport defects in motor neurons derived from FUS-ALS patients. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):861.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  133. Seifert A, et al. The ALS-associated FUS (P525L) variant does not directly interfere with microtubule-dependent kinesin-1 motility. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2422.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  134. Kreiter N, et al. Age-dependent neurodegeneration and organelle transport deficiencies in mutant TDP43 patient-derived neurons are independent of TDP43 aggregation. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;115:167–181.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  135. Bosco DA, et al. Wild-type and mutant SOD1 share an aberrant conformation and a common pathogenic pathway in ALS. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(11):1396–1403.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  136. Morfini GA, et al. Inhibition of fast axonal transport by pathogenic SOD1 involves activation of p38 MAP kinase. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65235.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  137. Sama RR, et al. ALS-linked FUS exerts a gain of toxic function involving aberrant p38 MAPK activation. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):115.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  138. Gibbs KL, et al. Inhibiting p38 MAPK alpha rescues axonal retrograde transport defects in a mouse model of ALS. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(6):596.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  139. Guo W, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 screen in human iPSC-derived cortical neurons identifies NEK6 as a novel disease modifier of C9orf72 poly(PR) toxicity. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;19(4):1245–1259.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  140. De Vos KJ, et al. Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked SOD1 mutants perturb fast axonal transport to reduce axonal mitochondria content. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(22):2720–2728.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  141. Moller A, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated mutant SOD1 inhibits anterograde axonal transport of mitochondria by reducing Miro1 levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(23):4668–4679.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  142. Sung H, Lloyd TE. Defective axonal transport of endo-lysosomes and dense core vesicles in a Drosophila model of C9-ALS/FTD. Traffic. 2022;23(9):430–441.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  143. Fumagalli L, et al. C9orf72-derived arginine-containing dipeptide repeats associate with axonal transport machinery and impede microtubule-based motility. Sci Adv. 2021;7(15):eabg3013.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  144. Cunningham KM, et al. TFEB/Mitf links impaired nuclear import to autophagolysosomal dysfunction in C9-ALS. Elife. 2020;9:e59419.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  145. Shi Y, et al. Haploinsufficiency leads to neurodegeneration in C9ORF72 ALS/FTD human induced motor neurons. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):313–325.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  146. Sleigh JN, et al. Mice carrying ALS mutant TDP-43, but not mutant FUS, display in vivo defects in axonal transport of signaling endosomes. Cell Rep. 2020;30(11):3655–3662.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  147. Alami NH, et al. Axonal transport of TDP-43 mRNA granules is impaired by ALS-causing mutations. Neuron. 2014;81(3):536–543.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  148. Smith BN, et al. Mutations in the vesicular trafficking protein annexin A11 are associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(388):eaad9157.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  149. Zhang K, et al. ANXA11 mutations prevail in Chinese ALS patients with and without cognitive dementia. Neurol Genet. 2018;4(3):e237.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  150. Stavrou M, et al. Genetic mechanisms of peripheral nerve disease. Neurosci Lett. 2021;742:135357.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  151. Latremoliere A, et al. Neuronal-specific TUBB3 is not required for normal neuronal function but is essential for timely axon regeneration. Cell Rep. 2018;24(7):1865–1879.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  152. Evgrafov OV, et al. Mutant small heat-shock protein 27 causes axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Nat Genet. 2004;36(6):602–606.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  153. Almeida-Souza L, et al. Small heat-shock protein HSPB1 mutants stabilize microtubules in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. J Neurosci. 2011;31(43):15320–15328.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  154. d’Ydewalle C, et al. HDAC6 inhibitors reverse axonal loss in a mouse model of mutant HSPB1-induced Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nat Med. 2011;17(8):968–974.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  155. Zuchner S, et al. Mutations in the mitochondrial GTPase mitofusin 2 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 2A. Nat Genet. 2004;36(5):449–451.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  156. Mo Z, et al. Aberrant GlyRS-HDAC6 interaction linked to axonal transport deficits in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1007.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  157. Verhoeven K, et al. MFN2 mutation distribution and genotype/phenotype correlation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2. Brain. 2006;129(pt 8):2093–2102.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  158. Chapman AL, et al. Axonal transport defects in a mitofusin 2 loss of function model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67276.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  159. Saporta MA, et al. Axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease patient-derived motor neurons demonstrate disease-specific phenotypes including abnormal electrophysiological properties. Exp Neurol. 2015;263:190–199.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  160. Wang L, et al. Mitofusin 2 regulates axonal transport of calpastatin to prevent neuromuscular synaptic elimination in skeletal muscles. Cell Metab. 2018;28(3):400–414.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  161. Klein CJ, et al. TRPV4 mutations and cytotoxic hypercalcemia in axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies. Neurology. 2011;76(10):887–894.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  162. Woolums BM, et al. TRPV4 disrupts mitochondrial transport and causes axonal degeneration via a CaMKII-dependent elevation of intracellular Ca2+. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2679.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  163. Kalmar B, et al. Mitochondrial deficits and abnormal mitochondrial retrograde axonal transport play a role in the pathogenesis of mutant Hsp27-induced Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(17):3313–3326.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  164. Israeli E, et al. Intermediate filament aggregates cause mitochondrial dysmotility and increase energy demands in giant axonal neuropathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(11):2143–2157.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  165. Lowery J, et al. Abnormal intermediate filament organization alters mitochondrial motility in giant axonal neuropathy fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27(4):608–616.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  166. Yates DM, et al. Neurofilament subunit (NFL) head domain phosphorylation regulates axonal transport of neurofilaments. Eur J Cell Biol. 2009;88(4):193–202.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  167. Gentil BJ, et al. Normal role of the low-molecular-weight neurofilament protein in mitochondrial dynamics and disruption in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. FASEB J. 2012;26(3):1194–1203.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  168. Perez-Olle R, et al. Mutations in the neurofilament light gene linked to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease cause defects in transport. J Neurochem. 2005;93(4):861–874.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  169. McCray BA, et al. Disease mutations in Rab7 result in unregulated nucleotide exchange and inappropriate activation. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(6):1033–1047.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  170. Ponomareva OY, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2b associated Rab7 mutations cause axon growth and guidance defects during vertebrate sensory neuron development. Neural Dev. 2016;11:2.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  171. Zhang K, et al. Defective axonal transport of Rab7 GTPase results in dysregulated trophic signaling. J Neurosci. 2013;33(17):7451–7462.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  172. Del Ser T, et al. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with the GSK-3 inhibitor tideglusib: a pilot study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(1):205–215.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  173. Lovestone S, et al. A phase II trial of tideglusib in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(1):75–88.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  174. Georgievska B, et al. AZD1080, a novel GSK3 inhibitor, rescues synaptic plasticity deficits in rodent brain and exhibits peripheral target engagement in humans. J Neurochem. 2013;125(3):446–456.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  175. Alam J, et al. Neflamapimod: clinical phase 2b-ready oral small molecule inhibitor of p38α to reverse synaptic dysfunction in early Alzheimer’s disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(4):273–278.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  176. Prins ND, et al. A phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled 24-week treatment clinical study of the p38 alpha kinase inhibitor neflamapimod in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):106.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  177. Hempen B, Brion JP. Reduction of acetylated alpha-tubulin immunoreactivity in neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996;55(9):964–972.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  178. Zhang F, et al. Posttranslational modifications of α-tubulin in Alzheimer disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2015;4:9.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  179. Bobrowska A, et al. Hdac6 knock-out increases tubulin acetylation but does not modify disease progression in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20696.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  180. Trzeciakiewicz H, et al. An HDAC6-dependent surveillance mechanism suppresses tau-mediated neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5522.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  181. Stoklund Dittlau K, et al. Human motor units in microfluidic devices are impaired by FUS mutations and improved by HDAC6 inhibition. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16(9):2213–2227.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  182. Onishi T, et al. A novel orally active HDAC6 inhibitor T-518 shows a therapeutic potential for Alzheimer’s disease and tauopathy in mice. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15423.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  183. Mazzocchi M, et al. The class II histone deacetylases as therapeutic targets for Parkinson’s disease. Neuronal Signal. 2020;4(2):NS20200001.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  184. Govindarajan N, et al. Reducing HDAC6 ameliorates cognitive deficits in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(1):52–63.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  185. Fazal R, et al. HDAC6 inhibition restores TDP-43 pathology and axonal transport defects in human motor neurons with TARDBP mutations. EMBO J. 2021;40(7):e106177.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  186. Adalbert R, et al. Novel HDAC6 inhibitors increase tubulin acetylation and rescue axonal transport of mitochondria in a model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2F. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11(3):258–267.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  187. Dompierre JP, et al. Histone deacetylase 6 inhibition compensates for the transport deficit in Huntington’s disease by increasing tubulin acetylation. J Neurosci. 2007;27(13):3571–3583.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  188. Guedes-Dias P, et al. HDAC6 inhibition induces mitochondrial fusion, autophagic flux and reduces diffuse mutant huntingtin in striatal neurons. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(11):2484–2493.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  189. Pulya S, et al. HDAC6 as privileged target in drug discovery: a perspective. Pharmacol Res. 2021;163:105274.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  190. Gal J, et al. HDAC6 regulates mutant SOD1 aggregation through two SMIR motifs and tubulin acetylation. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(21):15035–15045.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  191. Gitler AD, et al. The Parkinson’s disease protein alpha-synuclein disrupts cellular Rab homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(1):145–150.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  192. Chang J, et al. Spastic paraplegia proteins spastizin and spatacsin mediate autophagic lysosome reformation. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5249–5262.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  193. Guo L, et al. Cyclophilin D deficiency rescues axonal mitochondrial transport in Alzheimer’s neurons. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54914.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  194. Marrone L, et al. SPG15 protein deficits are at the crossroads between lysosomal abnormalities, altered lipid metabolism and synaptic dysfunction. Hum Mol Genet. 2022;31(16):2693–2710.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  195. Surana S, et al. The evolution of the axonal transport toolkit. Traffic. 2020;21(1):13–33.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  196. Song Y, et al. Fast axonal transport in isolated axoplasm from the squid giant axon. Methods Cell Biol. 2016;131:331–348.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (June 1, 2023): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Regulation of axonal transport
  • Disruption of axonal transport and neurodegeneration
  • Mutations in motor proteins cause neurodegeneration
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Huntington’s disease
  • Hereditary spastic paraplegia
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Inherited peripheral neuropathies
  • Axonal transport–directed therapeutics
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts