Usage Information
Abstract
Background Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive subtype, the presence of which changes the prognosis and management of metastatic prostate cancer.Methods We performed analytical validation of a Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) multiplex RNA qPCR assay to identify the limit of quantification (LOQ) in cell lines, synthetic cDNA, and patient samples. We next profiled 116 longitudinal samples from a prospectively collected institutional cohort of 17 patients with metastatic prostate cancer (7 NEPC, 10 adenocarcinoma) as well as 265 samples from 139 patients enrolled in 3 adenocarcinoma phase II trials of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). We assessed a NEPC liquid biomarker via the presence of neuroendocrine markers and the absence of androgen receptor (AR) target genes.Results Using the analytical validation LOQ, liquid biomarker NEPC detection in the longitudinal cohort had a per-sample sensitivity of 51.35% and a specificity of 91.14%. However, when we incorporated the serial information from multiple liquid biopsies per patient, a unique aspect of this study, the per-patient predictions were 100% accurate, with a receiver-operating-curve (ROC) AUC of 1. In the adenocarcinoma ARSI trials, the presence of neuroendocrine markers, even while AR target gene expression was retained, was a strong negative prognostic factor.Conclusion Our analytically validated CTC biomarker can detect NEPC with high diagnostic accuracy when leveraging serial samples that are only feasible using liquid biopsies. Patients with expression of NE genes while retaining AR-target gene expression may indicate the transition to neuroendocrine differentiation, with clinical characteristics consistent with this phenotype.Funding NIH (DP2 OD030734, 1UH2CA260389, R01CA247479, and P30 CA014520), Department of Defense (PC190039 and PC200334), and Prostate Cancer Foundation (Movember Foundation — PCF Challenge Award).
Authors
Shuang G. Zhao, Jamie M. Sperger, Jennifer L. Schehr, Rana R. McKay, Hamid Emamekhoo, Anupama Singh, Zachery D. Schultz, Rory M. Bade, Charlotte N. Stahlfeld, Cole S. Gilsdorf, Camila I. Hernandez, Serena K. Wolfe, Richel D. Mayberry, Hannah M. Krause, Matt Bootsma, Kyle T. Helzer, Nicholas Rydzewski, Hamza Bakhtiar, Yue Shi, Grace Blitzer, Christos E. Kyriakopoulos, David Kosoff, Xiao X. Wei, John Floberg, Nan Sethakorn, Marina Sharifi, Paul M. Harari, Wei Huang, Himisha Beltran, Toni K. Choueiri, Howard I. Scher, Dana E. Rathkopf, Susan Halabi, Andrew J. Armstrong, David J. Beebe, Menggang Yu, Kaitlin E. Sundling, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Joshua M. Lang
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,212 | 206 |
| 152 | 48 | |
| Figure | 419 | 12 |
| Supplemental data | 213 | 9 |
| Citation downloads | 116 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,112 | 275 |
| Total Views | 2,387 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)