Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting the NANOG/HDAC1 axis reverses resistance to PD-1 blockade by reinvigorating the antitumor immunity cycle
Se Jin Oh, … , Marcus W. Bosenberg, Tae Woo Kim
Se Jin Oh, … , Marcus W. Bosenberg, Tae Woo Kim
Published February 1, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(6):e147908. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI147908.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Targeting the NANOG/HDAC1 axis reverses resistance to PD-1 blockade by reinvigorating the antitumor immunity cycle

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has shifted the paradigm for cancer treatment. However, the majority of patients lack effective responses because of the emergence of immune-refractory tumors that disrupt the amplification of antitumor immunity. Therefore, the identification of clinically available targets that restrict antitumor immunity is required to develop potential combination therapies. Here, using transcriptomic data on patients with cancer treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy and newly established mouse preclinical anti–PD-1 therapy–refractory models, we identified NANOG as a factor restricting the amplification of the antitumor immunity cycle, thereby contributing to the immune-refractory feature of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Mechanistically, NANOG induced insufficient T cell infiltration and resistance to CTL-mediated killing via the histone deacetylase 1–dependent (HDAC1-dependent) regulation of CXCL10 and MCL1, respectively. Importantly, HDAC1 inhibition using an actionable agent sensitized NANOGhi immune-refractory tumors to PD-1 blockade by reinvigorating the antitumor immunity cycle. Thus, our findings implicate the NANOG/HDAC1 axis as a central molecular target for controlling immune-refractory tumors and provide a rationale for combining HDAC inhibitors to reverse the refractoriness of tumors to ICB therapy.

Authors

Se Jin Oh, Hyo-Jung Lee, Kwon-Ho Song, Suyeon Kim, Eunho Cho, Jaeyoon Lee, Marcus W. Bosenberg, Tae Woo Kim

×

Figure 7

HDAC1 inhibition renders tumors susceptible to an anti–PD-1–mediated antitumor immune response.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
HDAC1 inhibition renders tumors susceptible to an anti–PD-1–mediated ant...
(A) CT26 P0 and CT26 P3 cells were transfected with siGFP or siNANOG. After 16 hours, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of FK228, MS-275, SAHA, or cisplatin for 48 hours. Cell viability was measured by counting live cells using trypan blue. (B) Western blot analysis of NANOG, HDAC1, CXCL10, MCL1, AcH3-K14, and AcH3-K27 expression in CT26 P3 cells treated with DMSO or FK228. β-Actin was used as an internal loading control. (C–I) CT26 P3 tumor–bearing mice were administered vehicle or FK228, with or without PD-1 antibody treatment. (C) Tumor volume curves and (D) changes in tumor growth compared with baseline, 17 days after challenge. (E) Survival of mice inoculated with CT26 P3 and treated with the indicated reagents. (F) Flow cytometric profiles of tumor-infiltrating CD3+CD8+ T cells. (G) Ratio of granzyme B+ to tumor-infiltrating CD3+CD8+ T cells. (H) Frequency of apoptotic cells in the tumors. (I) Quantification of antigen-specific CTLs in spleens from tumor-bearing mice. Ten mice from each group were used for in vivo experiments. Results in the graphs represent 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Data represent the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, by 2-way ANOVA (A) and 1-way ANOVA (F–I).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts