Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Enasidenib drives human erythroid differentiation independently of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2
Ritika Dutta, … , Anupama Narla, Ravindra Majeti
Ritika Dutta, … , Anupama Narla, Ravindra Majeti
Published January 2, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(4):1843-1849. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI133344.
View: Text | PDF
Concise Communication Hematology

Enasidenib drives human erythroid differentiation independently of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancer-related anemia is present in more than 60% of newly diagnosed cancer patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and high medical costs. Drugs that enhance erythropoiesis are urgently required to decrease transfusion rates and improve quality of life. Clinical studies have observed an unexpected improvement in hemoglobin and RBC transfusion-independence in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with the isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutant-specific inhibitor enasidenib, leading to improved quality of life without a reduction in AML disease burden. Here, we demonstrate that enasidenib enhanced human erythroid differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors. The phenomenon was not observed with other IDH1/2 inhibitors and occurred in IDH2-deficient CRISPR-engineered progenitors independently of D-2-hydroxyglutarate. The effect of enasidenib on hematopoietic progenitors was mediated by protoporphyrin accumulation, driving heme production and erythroid differentiation in committed CD71+ progenitors rather than hematopoietic stem cells. Our results position enasidenib as a promising therapeutic agent for improvement of anemia and provide the basis for a clinical trial using enasidenib to decrease transfusion dependence in a wide array of clinical contexts.

Authors

Ritika Dutta, Tian Yi Zhang, Thomas Köhnke, Daniel Thomas, Miles Linde, Eric Gars, Melissa Stafford, Satinder Kaur, Yusuke Nakauchi, Raymond Yin, Armon Azizi, Anupama Narla, Ravindra Majeti

×

Figure 2

Enasidenib increases erythroid differentiation independently of IDH2.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Enasidenib increases erythroid differentiation independently of IDH2.
(A...
(A) FC of percentage of CD71+GPA+ (DMSO = 1) in CB-CD34+-derived cells on day 8 of EDC with AG-120 (n = 4), AGI-6780 (n = 3), and AG-881 (n = 4). (B) D-2-HG measurement in the parental THP-1 cell line, an inducible IDH2 R140Q mutant THP-1 cell line, and CB-CD34+-derived cells treated with DMSO or enasidenib for 8 days in EDC (n = 3). (C) FC of percentage of CD71+GPA+ (DMSO only = 1) in CB-CD34+-derived cells on day 8 of EDC with the addition of (2R)-octyl-alpha-2HG at the indicated concentrations (n = 3). (D) Schematic of CRISPR-Cas9 knockout strategy, with disruption of IDH2 in exon 3 and integration of AAV donors with BFP or GFP reporters. RHA/LHA – right/left homology arm (E) PCR with a reverse primer in the AAV donor (SFFV) and forward primer in the genome (IDH2) to confirm site-specific integration of the AAV donor. AAVS1-edited cells (safe harbor locus) were used as control. (F) Western blot showing knockout of IDH2 in 3 independent CB samples, with vinculin as the loading control. (G) FC of percentage of CD71+GPA-high IDH2-KO cells at day 8 of EDC compared with AAVS1 control (AAVS1 = 1) (n = 3). (H) FC of percentage of CD71+GPA-high in AAVS1 and IDH2-KO cells treated with DMSO or enasidenib (AAVS1 DMSO = 1, with statistical comparisons made to each respective DMSO condition) (n = 3). Cells were gated on live, singlet, BFP+GFP+ before gating on CD71/GPA. Graphs represent mean ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired 2-tailed t tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts