Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
γ9δ2T cell diversity and the receptor interface with tumor cells
Anna Vyborova, Dennis X. Beringer, Domenico Fasci, Froso Karaiskaki, Eline van Diest, Lovro Kramer, Aram de Haas, Jasper Sanders, Anke Janssen, Trudy Straetemans, Daniel Olive, Jeanette Leusen, Lola Boutin, Steven Nedellec, Samantha L. Schwartz, Michael J. Wester, Keith A. Lidke, Emmanuel Scotet, Diane S. Lidke, Albert J.R. Heck, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball
Anna Vyborova, Dennis X. Beringer, Domenico Fasci, Froso Karaiskaki, Eline van Diest, Lovro Kramer, Aram de Haas, Jasper Sanders, Anke Janssen, Trudy Straetemans, Daniel Olive, Jeanette Leusen, Lola Boutin, Steven Nedellec, Samantha L. Schwartz, Michael J. Wester, Keith A. Lidke, Emmanuel Scotet, Diane S. Lidke, Albert J.R. Heck, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

γ9δ2T cell diversity and the receptor interface with tumor cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

γ9δ2T cells play a major role in cancer immune surveillance, yet the clinical translation of their in vitro promise remains challenging. To address limitations of previous clinical attempts using expanded γ9δ2T cells, we explored the clonal diversity of γ9δ2T cell repertoires and characterized their target. We demonstrated that only a fraction of expanded γ9δ2T cells was active against cancer cells and that activity of the parental clone, or functional avidity of selected γ9δ2 T cell receptors (γ9δ2TCRs), was not associated with clonal frequency. Furthermore, we analyzed the target-receptor interface and provided a 2-receptor, 3-ligand model. We found that activation was initiated by binding of the γ9δ2TCR to BTN2A1 through the regions between CDR2 and CDR3 of the TCR γ chain and modulated by the affinity of the CDR3 region of the TCRδ chain, which was phosphoantigen independent (pAg independent) and did not depend on CD277. CD277 was secondary, serving as a mandatory coactivating ligand. We found that binding of CD277 to its putative ligand did not depend on the presence of γ9δ2TCR, did depend on usage of the intracellular CD277, created pAg-dependent proximity to BTN2A1, enhanced cell-cell conjugate formation, and stabilized the immunological synapse (IS). This process critically depended on the affinity of the γ9δ2TCR and required membrane flexibility of the γ9δ2TCR and CD277, facilitating their polarization and high-density recruitment during IS formation.

Authors

Anna Vyborova, Dennis X. Beringer, Domenico Fasci, Froso Karaiskaki, Eline van Diest, Lovro Kramer, Aram de Haas, Jasper Sanders, Anke Janssen, Trudy Straetemans, Daniel Olive, Jeanette Leusen, Lola Boutin, Steven Nedellec, Samantha L. Schwartz, Michael J. Wester, Keith A. Lidke, Emmanuel Scotet, Diane S. Lidke, Albert J.R. Heck, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball

×

Figure 3

Staining of target and effector cells with γδTCR and CD277e multimers of increasing valency.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Staining of target and effector cells with γδTCR and CD277e multimers of...
(A and B) Results for staining of Daudi (A) and HEK293T (B) cells using fluorescent TCR tetramers (streptavidin-PE). Dots indicate the MFI values for individual FACS experiments (n = 4). (C and D) Results for staining of Daudi (C) and HEK293T (D) cells using fluorescent TCR beads (streptavidin-coated purple beads). Dots indicate the fold change in MFI values compared with LM1 (no PAM condition) in the same individual FACS experiment (n = 4, for αβTCR and Vγ9Vδ2-H85R-TCRs; n = 8 for all other TCRs). For the 100-μM PAM condition, the cells were incubated for 1 to 2 hours with PAM before staining. (E) Results for staining of Jurkat-76 (untransduced or transduced with Vγ9Vδ2-TCR Cl5) and Daudi cells using fluorescent tetramers containing the αβTCR control, CD277e dimers (both n = 4), or the CD277e-R44E mutant (n = 2). Dots indicate the MFI values for individual FACS experiments. (F) Results for staining of Jurkat-76 and Daudi cells using fluorescent tetramers containing the αβTCR control, CD277e dimers (n = 6 for Jurkat-76, n = 4 for Daudi), or the CD277e-R44E mutant (n = 2 for all cells). Dots indicate the MFI values for individual FACS experiments. For the TCR tetramer and bead staining results shown in A–D, a 1-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test was performed. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. **P < 0.005 and ***P < 0.001. For the CD277e tetramer and bead staining results shown in E and F, a 2 tailed, paired t test was performed. All statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 8.3.0.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts