Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting glutamine metabolism enhances tumor-specific immunity by modulating suppressive myeloid cells
Min-Hee Oh, … , Maureen R. Horton, Jonathan D. Powell
Min-Hee Oh, … , Maureen R. Horton, Jonathan D. Powell
Published April 23, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3865-3884. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI131859.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Targeting glutamine metabolism enhances tumor-specific immunity by modulating suppressive myeloid cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Myeloid cells comprise a major component of the tumor microenvironment (TME) that promotes tumor growth and immune evasion. By employing a small-molecule inhibitor of glutamine metabolism, not only were we able to inhibit tumor growth, but we markedly inhibited the generation and recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Targeting tumor glutamine metabolism led to a decrease in CSF3 and hence recruitment of MDSCs as well as immunogenic cell death, leading to an increase in inflammatory tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Alternatively, inhibiting glutamine metabolism of the MDSCs themselves led to activation-induced cell death and conversion of MDSCs to inflammatory macrophages. Surprisingly, blocking glutamine metabolism also inhibited IDO expression of both the tumor and myeloid-derived cells, leading to a marked decrease in kynurenine levels. This in turn inhibited the development of metastasis and further enhanced antitumor immunity. Indeed, targeting glutamine metabolism rendered checkpoint blockade–resistant tumors susceptible to immunotherapy. Overall, our studies define an intimate interplay between the unique metabolism of tumors and the metabolism of suppressive immune cells.

Authors

Min-Hee Oh, Im-Hong Sun, Liang Zhao, Robert D. Leone, Im-Meng Sun, Wei Xu, Samuel L. Collins, Ada J. Tam, Richard L. Blosser, Chirag H. Patel, Judson M. Englert, Matthew L. Arwood, Jiayu Wen, Yee Chan-Li, Lukáš Tenora, Pavel Majer, Rana Rais, Barbara S. Slusher, Maureen R. Horton, Jonathan D. Powell

×

Figure 2

Glutamine antagonism inhibits infiltration of MDSCs in both primary tumor and lung metastatic sites.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Glutamine antagonism inhibits infiltration of MDSCs in both primary tumo...
4T1 cells (1 × 105) were implanted subcutaneously into the mammary fat pad of BALB/cJ female mice. On days 7, 10, 13, 17, and 24, mice were injected i.p. with 250 μg anti-PD1 and/or 100 μg anti-CTLA4 antibodies. 4T1 tumor–bearing mice were treated with JHU083 (1 mg/kg) starting on day 7 after tumor inoculation. After 7 days of treatment, a lower dose (0.3 mg/kg) of JHU083 was used (n = 5/group). (A) On day 17, percentages of PMN-MDSCs (CD11b+F4/80–Ly6CloLy6Ghi) and Mo-MDSCs (CD11b+F4/80–Ly6ChiLy6G–) of live cells from the blood were analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 5/group). (B) On day 14, tumors were harvested and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) were analyzed by flow cytometry. The populations of PMN-MDSCs and Mo-MDSCs are shown. (C) Cell population numbers were counted and total cell numbers were divided by their respective tumor weights (mg). n = 5–10/group. (D) The number of TAMs (CD11b+F4/80+CD8–Ly6C–Ly6G–) per mg. (E) On day 14, lungs from subcutaneously injected 4T1 tumor–bearing mice were harvested. PMN-MDSCs and Mo-MDSCs among lung-infiltrating immune cells were counted. n = 3/group. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments and are presented as the mean ± SD. NS, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005; ****P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons post hoc test (A, B, and E) or Mann-Whitney test (C and D).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts